Methods and systems for compensating for common failures in fail operational systems
US-9195232-B1 · Nov 24, 2015 · US
US9563523B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9563523-B2 |
| Application number | US-201514688083-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Apr 16, 2015 |
| Priority date | Apr 16, 2015 |
| Publication date | Feb 7, 2017 |
| Grant date | Feb 7, 2017 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
An integrated fail-silence and fail-operational control system includes a primary controller controlling features of devices while operating under non-fault operating conditions. A secondary controller includes a fail detector/decider module monitoring faults in the primary controller. The fail detector/decider module determines whether the fault in the primary controller is associated with a fail-silence requirement or a fail-operational requirement. If the fail detector/decider module determines the fault is a fail-silence requirement, then the fail detector/decider module actuates a shutdown command to the primary controller to shut down a feature affected by the fault where the feature becomes non-operational. If the fail detector/decider module determines that the feature associated with the fault is a fail-operational requirement, then the fail detector/decider module signals the primary controller to relinquish controls of the feature to the secondary controller. The secondary controller functions as a high assurance system for controlling the feature in a fail-operational mode.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. An integrated fail-silence and fail-operational control system comprising: a primary controller controlling features of devices while operating under non-fault operating conditions; a secondary controller including a fail detector/decider module, the fail detector/decider module monitoring faults in the primary controller and the secondary controller, the fail detector/decider module determining whether the fault in the primary controller is associated with a fail-silence requirement or a fail-operational requirement, wherein if the fail detector/decider module determines the fault is a fail-silence requirement, then the fail detector/decider actuates a shutdown command to the primary controller to shut down a feature affected by the fault where the feature becomes non-operational, and wherein if the fail detector/decider module determines that the feature associated with the fault is a fail-operational requirement, then the fail detector/decider module signals the primary controller to relinquish controls of the feature to the secondary controller, wherein secondary controller functions as a high assurance system for controlling the feature in a fail-operational mode. 2. The integrated fail-silence and fail-operational control system of claim 1 wherein each feature of the system is categorized as a fail-silence feature or a fail-operational feature. 3. The integrated fail-silence and fail-operational control system of claim 2 wherein the fail-silence detector/decider monitors and detects faults in the primary controller. 4. The integrated fail-silence and fail-operational control system of claim 3 wherein the fail detector/decider module detects erroneous or unsafe conditions within the primary controller. 5. The integrated fail-silence and fail-operational control system of claim 4 wherein the fail detector/decider module detection of faults in the primary controller is common between fail-silence features and fail-operational features. 6. The integrated fail-silence and fail-operational control system of claim 2 wherein the fail-silence detector/decider determines whether the feature associated with the fault is categorized as a fail-silence feature or a fail-operational feature. 7. The integrated fail-silence and fail-operational control system of claim 1 further comprising a fail-operational control module for controlling features categorized as fail-operational features, the fail-operational control module controlling fail-operational features in response to the fail detection/decider module determining that the fault is a fail-operational fault. 8. The integrated fail-silence and fail-operational control system of claim 7 wherein the primary controller relinquishes control of the feature associated with the fail-operational condition in response to a communication from the fail detector/decider module determining the fault is the fail-operational fault. 9. The integrated fail-silence and fail-operational control system of claim 1 wherein software for controlling only features categorized as fail-operational features are stored in the fail-operational control module of the secondary controller. 10. The integrated fail-silence and fail-operational control system of claim 9 wherein the fail-operational control module includes software for controlling fail-operational features at reduced functionality. 11. A fault control strategy for an integrated fail-silence and fail-operational control system comprising the steps of: providing a primary controller controlling features of devices while operating under non-fault operating condition; providing a secondary controller including a fail detector/decider module, the fail detector/decider module monitoring faults in the primary controller and the secondary controller; determining, by the fail detector/decider module, whether a fault in the primary controller is a fail-silence requirement or a fail-operational requirement; actuating a shutdown command to the primary controller, by the fail detector/decider, to shut down the feature affected by the fault where the feature becomes non-operational in response to the fail detector/decider module determining that the fault is a fail-silence requirement; and relinquishing control of the feature to the secondary controller in response to the fail detector/decider module determining that the feature associated with the fault is a fail-operational requirement, wherein the secondary controller functions as a high assurance system for controlling the feature in a fail-operational mode. 12. The fault control strategy of claim 11 wherein each feature of the system is categorized as a fail-silence feature or a fail-operational feature. 13. The fault control strategy of claim 12 wherein faults in the primary controller are monitored and detected in the fail detector/decider module. 14. The fault control strategy of claim 13 wherein erroneous or unsafe conditions within the primary controller are determined by the fail detector/decider module. 15. The fault control strategy of claim 14 wherein the fail detector/decider module detection of faults in the primary controller is common between fail-silence conditions and fail-operational conditions. 16. The fault control strategy of claim 12 wherein the fail-silence detector/decider determines whether the feature associated with the fault is categorized as a fail-silence feature or a fail-operational feature. 17. The fault control strategy of claim 11 further comprising the step of controlling, by a fail-operational control module, features categorized as fail-operational features, the fail-operational control module controlling fail-operational features in response to fail detection/decider module determining that the fault is a fail-operational fault. 18. The fault control strategy of claim 17 wherein control of the feature associated with the fail-operational condition is relinquished by the primary controller in response to a communication from the fail detector/decider module determining the fault is a fail-operational fault. 19. The fault control strategy of claim 11 wherein software for controlling only features categorized as fail-operational features is stored in the fail-operational control module of the secondary controller. 20. The fault control strategy of claim 19 wherein the fail-operational control module includes software for controlling fail-operational features at reduced functionality.
eliminating a faulty processor or activating a spare · CPC title
Real-time · CPC title
with a single idle spare processing component · CPC title
using additional compare functionality in one or some but not all of the redundant processing components · CPC title
Switching into safety or degraded mode, e.g. protection and supervision after failure · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.