Channel Mapping for an Aggregated Touchless Wireless Fronthaul
US-2016128085-A1 · May 5, 2016 · US
US9560531B1 · US · B1
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9560531-B1 |
| Application number | US-201514872877-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B1 |
| Filing date | Oct 1, 2015 |
| Priority date | Oct 1, 2015 |
| Publication date | Jan 31, 2017 |
| Grant date | Jan 31, 2017 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A method and system for joint wireless and fixed network optimization for heterogeneous cellular networks includes performing a feasibility evaluation for an x-haul network comprising at least one of a fronthaul network and a backhaul network, after determining base station locations and radio frequency (RF) parameters. The feasibility evaluation may determine, based on a network graph, which small cell locations are accessible according to actual network demand and based on cost metrics for different types of network links.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A computer system for evaluating cellular networks, comprising: a processor enabled to access a memory media storing instructions executable by the processor to: receive network topology information and base station parameters for a service area of a cellular network, wherein the network topology information includes locations of base stations associated with the base station parameters and a user density for the service area, and wherein the base stations include large cells; determine performance criteria for additional small cells to be added to the service area, wherein the performance criteria specify network performance attributes of an x-haul network for the service area, the x-haul network including at least one of a fronthaul network and a backhaul network; determine physical cell constraints associated with the additional small cells; based on the performance criteria and the physical cell constraints, generating a plurality of candidate designs for the x-haul network, wherein the candidate designs utilize different types of network links for at least some of the x-haul network; combine the candidate designs in an x-haul network graph, wherein the x-haul network graph is a logical data structure that specifies: nodes in the x-haul network including the large cells and the additional small cells; the different types of network links in the x-haul network connecting to the nodes; auxiliary links representing site costs associated with the nodes; and a cost metric for each of the network links; and based on the x-haul network graph, when the performance criteria and the physical cell constraints are satisfied for each of the base stations by at least one of the candidate designs, output the candidate designs satisfying the performance criteria and the physical cell constraints. 2. The computer system of claim 1 , wherein the instructions to output the candidate designs further comprise instructions to: based on the cost metrics and the site costs, accept a candidate design output having a lowest cost for the x-haul network. 3. The computer system of claim 1 , wherein the site costs include cost of equipment associated with the network links. 4. The computer system of claim 1 , wherein the memory media further comprises instructions to: when the candidate designs output exceed a minimal cost, based on the cost metrics and the site costs, output an indication that the location for at least some of the additional small cells is rejected. 5. The computer system of claim 1 , wherein the network topology information and the base station parameters satisfy a utility criteria for the service area. 6. The computer system of claim 5 , wherein the utility criteria is a maximum proportional fair utility indicating that a given throughput is provided to all end users in the service area. 7. The computer system of claim 1 , wherein the instructions to determine the performance criteria for the additional small cells further comprise instructions to: determine a transmit power for at least one of a large cell and a small cell. 8. The computer system of claim 1 , wherein the physical cell constraints include a line-of-sight constraint for a small cell, and wherein the locations of the additional small cells are specified in 3 dimensions. 9. The computer system of claim 1 , wherein the different types of network links include at least one of: a wavelength division multiplexed fiber optic link; a passive fiber optical network link; and a wireless link. 10. The computer system of claim 1 , wherein the instructions to determine the performance criteria for the additional small cells further comprise instructions to: initially simulate the additional small cells in a powered off state; simulate powering on successively more of the additional small cells, beginning with most desirable locations of the additional small cells; simulate interference resulting among the additional small cells simulated as powered on; and based on the interference, determine an optimal number of the additional small cells in the service area.
Monitoring or testing based on specific metrics, e.g. QoS, energy consumption or environmental parameters · CPC title
Hierarchical cell structures · CPC title
Network planning tools · CPC title
for predicting network behaviour · CPC title
Discovery or management of network topologies · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.