Document transcription system training
US-9286896-B2 · Mar 15, 2016 · US
US9552809B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9552809-B2 |
| Application number | US-201615066677-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Mar 10, 2016 |
| Priority date | Aug 20, 2004 |
| Publication date | Jan 24, 2017 |
| Grant date | Jan 24, 2017 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A system is provided for training an acoustic model for use in speech recognition. In particular, such a system may be used to perform training based on a spoken audio stream and a non-literal transcript of the spoken audio stream. Such a system may identify text in the non-literal transcript which represents concepts having multiple spoken forms. The system may attempt to identify the actual spoken form in the audio stream which produced the corresponding text in the non-literal transcript, and thereby produce a revised transcript which more accurately represents the spoken audio stream. The revised, and more accurate, transcript may be used to train the acoustic model, thereby producing a better acoustic model than that which would be produced using conventional techniques, which perform training based directly on the original non-literal transcript.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. In a system including a first document containing at least some information in common with a spoken audio stream, a method comprising steps of: (A) determining that text in the first document represents an instance of a concept, comprising determining that the text has a format associated with the concept; (B) replacing the identified text with a context-free grammar specifying the plurality of spoken forms of the concept to produce a second document; (C) generating a document-specific language model based on the second document, comprising generating at least some of the document-specific language model based on the context-free grammar; (D) using the first language model in a speech recognition process to recognize the spoken audio stream and thereby to produce a third document. 2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: (E) using the third document and the spoken audio stream to train an acoustic model. 3. The method of claim 2 , wherein (E) comprises: (E) (1) filtering text from the third document by reference to the second document to produce a filtered document in which text filtered from the third document is marked as unreliable; and (E) (2) using the filtered document and the spoken audio stream to train the acoustic model. 4. A non-transitory computer-readable medium comprising computer program instructions executable by at least one computer processor to perform a method for use with a system, the system including a first document containing at least some information in common with a spoken audio stream, the method comprising: (E) determining that text in the first document represents an instance of a concept, comprising determining that the text has a format associated with the concept; (F) replacing the identified text with a context-free grammar specifying the plurality of spoken forms of the concept to produce a second document; (G) generating a document-specific language model based on the second document, comprising generating at least some of the document-specific language model based on the context-free grammar; (H) using the first language model in a speech recognition process to recognize the spoken audio stream and thereby to produce a third document. 5. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 4 , wherein the method further comprises: (E) using the third document and the spoken audio stream to train an acoustic model. 6. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 5 , wherein (E) comprises: (E) (1) filtering text from the third document by reference to the second document to produce a filtered document in which text filtered from the third document is marked as unreliable; and (E) (2) using the filtered document and the spoken audio stream to train the acoustic model.
Training · CPC title
Formal grammars, e.g. finite state automata, context free grammars or word networks · CPC title
Speech to text systems (G10L15/08 takes precedence) · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.