Architectures for high integrity multi-constellation solution separation
US-2015145724-A1 · May 28, 2015 · US
US9547086B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9547086-B2 |
| Application number | US-201313850341-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Mar 26, 2013 |
| Priority date | Mar 26, 2013 |
| Publication date | Jan 17, 2017 |
| Grant date | Jan 17, 2017 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A method of advanced receiver autonomous integrity monitoring of a navigation system is discussed and two modifications facilitating its implementation in a hybrid navigation system are disclosed. In the first approach, relations describing the effect of unmodeled biases in pseudo-measurement on the Kalman filter state estimate are analytically derived and their incorporation into the integrity monitoring algorithm is described. The method comprises receiving a plurality of signals transmitted from space-based satellites, determining a position full-solution and sub-solutions, specifying a pseudorange bias, computing a transformation matrix for the full-solution and all sub-solutions using a Kalman filter, computing a bias effect on an error of filtered state vectors of all sub-solutions, and adding the effect to computed vertical and horizontal protection levels. In the second approach, a modification for computationally effective calculation of the protection levels of hybrid navigation systems based on both integrity and non-integrity assured pseudorange error descriptions is disclosed.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A navigation system, comprising: one or more inertial sensors that generate inertial measurements; a receiver configured to receive a plurality of signals transmitted from a plurality of space-based satellites; and a processor operatively coupled to the receiver and the inertial sensors, the processor configured to perform a method of integrity monitoring, wherein the integrity monitoring performed by the processor comprises: determining a full position solution for the navigation system based on the plurality of signals; determining one or more position sub-solutions for the navigation system based on the plurality of signals; setting values for unmodeled pseudorange biases; computing a transformation matrix of the unmodeled pseudorange biases for the full solution and all sub-solutions using a Kalman filter; computing a bias effect of the unmodeled pseudorange biases on an error of a filtered state vector component for all sub-solutions; and adding the bias effect of the unmodeled pseudorange biases on the error of the filtered state vector component to computed protection levels for both vertical and horizontal dimensions. 2. A navigation system, comprising: one or more inertial sensors that generate inertial measurements; a receiver configured to receive a plurality of signals transmitted from a plurality of space-based satellites; and a processor operatively coupled to the receiver and the inertial sensors, the processor configured to perform a method of integrity monitoring, wherein the integrity monitoring performed by the processor comprises: determining a full position solution for the navigation system based on the plurality of signals; determining one or more position sub-solutions for the navigation system based on the plurality of signals; computing a variance of a vertical position for the full position solution with a Kalman filter based on an integrity assured error definition; computing a variance of a vertical position for the full position solution with the Kalman filter based on a non-integrity assured error definition; computing a variance of the vertical position for all position sub-solutions with one or more additional Kalman filters based on the integrity assured error definition; computing a multiplying coefficient; and computing an approximate variance of the vertical position for all position sub-solutions based on the non-integrity assured error definition and the multiplying coefficient. 3. The system of claim 2 , wherein the integrity monitoring performed by the processor further comprises: computing a covariance matrix of the horizontal position for a full position solution with the Kalman filter based on the integrity assured error definition; computing a covariance matrix of the horizontal position for the full position solution with the Kalman filter based on the non-integrity assured error definition; computing a covariance matrix of the horizontal position for all position sub-solutions with the one or more additional Kalman filters based on the integrity assured error definition; computing maximum eigenvalues for the horizontal position covariance matrices; computing a multiplying coefficient; and computing approximate maximum eigenvalues for the horizontal position covariance matrices for all position sub-solutions based on the non-integrity assured error definition and the multiplying coefficient. 4. The system of claim 1 , wherein the receiver is configured to receive signals from a global navigation satellite system (GNSS). 5. The system of claim 1 , wherein the receiver is configured to receive signals from a multi-constellation, multi-frequency GNSS. 6. The system of claim 1 , wherein the inertial sensors are implemented in an inertial measurement unit. 7. The system of claim 1 , further comprising one or more additional sensors in operative communication with the processor. 8. The system of claim 1 , wherein the system is onboard an aircraft. 9. The system of claim 1 , wherein the integrity monitoring is implemented as part of an advanced receiver autonomous integrity monitoring (ARAIM) algorithm. 10. The system of claim 2 , wherein the integrity monitoring is implemented as part of an advanced receiver autonomous integrity monitoring (ARAIM) algorithm. 11. The system of claim 2 , wherein the receiver is configured to receive signals from a global navigation satellite system (GNSS). 12. The system of claim 2 , wherein the receiver is configured to receive signals from a multi-constellation, multi-frequency GNSS. 13. The system of claim 2 wherein the inertial sensors are implemented in an inertial measurement unit. 14. The system of claim 2 , further comprising one or more additional sensors in operative communication with the processor. 15. The system of claim 2 , wherein the system is onboard an aircraft.
Integrity monitoring, fault detection or fault isolation of space segment · CPC title
the supplementary measurement being an inertial measurement, e.g. tightly coupled inertial · CPC title
combined with non-inertial navigation instruments · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.