Data processing method, data processing apparatus, and non-transitory computer-readable storage medium
US-2024320235-A1 · Sep 26, 2024 · US
US9529876B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9529876-B2 |
| Application number | US-201414296938-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Jun 5, 2014 |
| Priority date | Dec 19, 2013 |
| Publication date | Dec 27, 2016 |
| Grant date | Dec 27, 2016 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A computer manages methods for determining accurate document transformation by rendering the source document into a non-rasterized format, where the non-rasterized format is a rendered source document. The computer rendering the target document into a non-rasterized format, where the non-rasterized format is a rendered target document. The computer comparing one or more aspects of the rendered source document to corresponding one or more aspects of the rendered target document. The computer determining, based, at least in part, on the compared one or more aspects, whether or not the source document was accurately transformed to the target document.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A method for determining accurate document transformation, the method comprising: receiving, by one or more processors, a source document for transformation to a target document during an Extract Transform Load (ETL) process, wherein the source document is in a first format and the target document is in a second format; queuing, by one or more processors, the source document according to an assigned priority for the target document, wherein the assigned priority is based on a descending order of file sizes for target documents of queued source documents; responsive to determining the source document is next in the queue, transforming, by one or more processors, content of the source document into the target document, wherein transforming the content of the source document includes transforming the content from the first format to the second format; responsive to determining an increased likelihood the source document was not accurately transformed to the target document based on a file size for the target document, rendering, by one or more processors, the source document into a non-rasterized graphical format, wherein a rendered source document represents the source document in the non-rasterized graphical format; rendering, by one or more processors, the target document into a non-rasterized graphical format, wherein a rendered target document represents the target document in the non-rasterized graphical format; comparing, by one or more processors, one or more aspects of the rendered source document to corresponding one or more aspects of the rendered target document; and determining, by one or more processors, based at least in part on the compared one or more aspects, the source document was accurately transformed to the target document. 2. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the source document was accurately transformed to the target document, comprises: identifying, by one or more processors, a similarity threshold level, where the similarity threshold level represents whether the source document was accurately transformed to the target document; and determining, by one or more processors, whether or not the rendered target document has met the similarity threshold level with relation to the rendered source document. 3. The method of claim 2 , further comprising: displaying, by one or more processors, a notification on a user interface, wherein the notification includes a list including the source document, the target document, and the similarity threshold level. 4. The method of claim 3 , wherein the list further includes the rendered source document and the rendered target document. 5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more aspects include text content of a document, a layout of a document, an embedded object, or an overall visual appearance of a document. 6. The method of claim 1 , wherein rendering the source document into a non-rasterized graphical format, comprises: identifying, by one or more processors, one or more attachments associated with the source document; and rendering, by one or more processors, each of the one or more attachments associated with the source document into a non-rasterized format. 7. The method of claim 1 , wherein rendering the target document into a non-rasterized graphical format, comprises: identifying, by one or more processors, one or more attachments associated with the target document; and rendering, by one or more processors, each of the one or more attachments associated with the target document into a non-rasterized format.
Extract, transform and load [ETL] procedures, e.g. ETL data flows in data warehouses · CPC title
Document management systems · CPC title
Ensuring data consistency and integrity · CPC title
Physics · mapped topic
Physics · mapped topic
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.