Selective display of comprehension guides

US9524298B2 · US · B2

Patent metadata
FieldValue
Publication numberUS-9524298-B2
Application numberUS-201414262690-A
CountryUS
Kind codeB2
Filing dateApr 25, 2014
Priority dateApr 25, 2014
Publication dateDec 20, 2016
Grant dateDec 20, 2016

How to read this patent

A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.

  1. Title

    What the patent document calls the invention.

  2. Abstract

    A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.

  3. Assignees and inventors

    Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.

  4. Key dates

    Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.

  5. First independent claim

    The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.

  6. CPC / IPC classifications

    Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.

  7. Citations and related patents

    Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.

Abstract

Official abstract text for this publication.

Techniques are provided for selectively and dynamically determining one or more words of an electronic book to present with comprehension guides. For instance, an electronic device rendering an electronic book may determine whether to display some, all, or no words of the book with comprehension guides for words within the electronic book based on word difficulty, contextual importance or aspects of the user. Techniques are also provided for determining the content of comprehension guides to be presented with the words.

First claim

Opening claim text (preview).

What is claimed is: 1. A system comprising: one or more processors; and memory, storing instructions that, when executed on the one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to perform acts comprising: determining a score for a word of a plurality of words included in an electronic book, the score indicative of how difficult the word is for a particular user, wherein the determining the score is based at least in part on: a frequency of occurrence of the word in a general corpus of writings of a first language, wherein the score is higher the lower the frequency of occurrence; a contextual importance of the word within at least one of the electronic book or a subject matter area associated with the electronic book, wherein the score is higher the lower the contextual importance; user information about the particular user that includes the particular user's lookup history of definitions of words, wherein the score is lower if the word is included in the lookup history of the particular user; and feedback from the particular user indicative of a level of familiarity of the user with a meaning of the word, wherein the score is lower when the feedback is indicative of familiarity with the meaning of the word; ranking the word among the plurality of words based at least in part on the score; and based at least in part on the ranking, determining a comprehension guide to be presented with the word. 2. A system as recited in claim 1 , wherein the contextual importance of the word is based at least in part on the frequency of occurrence of the word in a corpus of writings in the subject matter area associated with the electronic book, the contextual importance of the word being higher for a higher frequency of occurrence of the word in the corpus of writings in the subject matter area associated with the electronic book. 3. A system as recited in claim 1 , wherein: the word is a compound word or an idiom comprising a plurality of terms, the compound word or the idiom having a meaning that is different from the literal meaning of the plurality of terms; and the determining the score for the word comprises determining a score for the compound word or the idiom based at least in part on a frequency of occurrence of the compound word or the idiom in a corpus of writings. 4. A system as recited in claim 1 , wherein the word is of a first language and the determining the score is further based at least in part on a relation of the first language to a second language that is the native language of the particular user, the relation of the first language to the second language indicating whether there is a similarity of the word in the first language to a translation of the word in the second language, the determining the score determining a higher score if there is the similarity between the word in the first language to the translation of the word in the second language. 5. A method comprising: under control of an electronic device that is configured with executable instructions, determining a difficulty value of a word of a plurality of words based at least in part on a frequency of occurrence of the word in a corpus of writings; determining a contextual importance of the word based at least in part on a subject matter area; receiving information from or derived for one or more users, including at least a particular user's lookup history of definitions of words; calculating a score for the word of the plurality of words indicative of how difficult the word is for the particular user at least from the determined difficulty value, the determined contextual importance, and the information from or derived for one or more users; and based at least in part on the score, determining a comprehension guide to be presented with the word. 6. A method as recited in claim 5 , further comprising: calculating a score for each of the plurality of words; and ranking each of the plurality of words based at least in part on the calculated score for each of the plurality of words. 7. A method as recited in claim 5 , wherein the determined contextual importance of the word is based at least in part on a frequency with which the word occurs in a corpus of writings related to the subject matter area. 8. A method as recited in claim 5 , wherein the calculating is further based at least in part on whether the word has multiple meanings in a first language. 9. A method as recited in claim 5 , wherein the information received from or derived for the one or more users also includes receiving feedback from a user of the one or more users indicative of the user being unfamiliar with a meaning of the word. 10. A method as recited in claim 9 , wherein the calculating further comprises determining that the one or more users are users that are similar to the particular user. 11. A method as recited in claim 5 , wherein the information received from or derived for the one or more users further includes at least feedback from a user of the one or more users indicative of a prior score of the word being inaccurate. 12. A method as recited in claim 5 , wherein the information received from or derived for the one or more users further includes at least one or more lookup requests for a definition of the word from the one or more users. 13. One or more computer-readable media storing computer-executable instructions that, when executed on one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to perform acts comprising: determining a score for a word of a plurality of words of an electronic book, wherein the determining is based at least in part on: a difficulty value of the word based at least in part on a frequency of occurrence of the word in a corpus of writings; a contextual importance of the word within the electronic book; and the word having two or more meanings in a first language that are present in the electronic book; and based at least in part on the score, determining a comprehension guide to be presented with the word. 14. One or more computer-readable media as recited in claim 13 , the acts further comprising: determining a score for each of the plurality of words; and ranking each of the plurality of words based at least in part on respective scores. 15. One or more computer-readable media as recited in claim 13 , wherein the contextual importance of the word is based at least in part on a frequency with which the word occurs in the electronic book. 16. One or more computer-readable media as recited in claim 13 , the determining is further based at least in part on information received from or derived for one or more users comprising feedback from a user indicative of the user being unfamiliar with a meaning of the word and one or more lookup requests for a definition of the word from the one or more users. 17. One or more computer-readable media as recited in claim 13 , wherein the determining the score for the word is further based at least in part on a relationship of a first language to a second language that is the native language of a reader, the word being a word of the first language. 18. One or more computer-readable media as recited in claim 13 , the acts further comprising determining a measure of occurrences of the word in books previously read by a user and wherein the determining the score is further based on the measure of occurrences of the word. 19. One or more computer-readable media storing computer-executable instructions that, when executed on one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to perform

Assignees

Inventors

Classifications

  • Semantic analysis · CPC title

  • Annotation, e.g. comment data or footnotes · CPC title

  • Dictionaries · CPC title

  • Teaching not covered by other main groups of this subclass (teaching or practice apparatus for gun-aiming or gun-laying F41G3/26) · CPC title

  • with visual presentation of the material to be studied, e.g. using film strip · CPC title

Patent family

Related publications grouped by family.

External sources

Frequently asked questions

Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.

What does patent US9524298B2 cover?
Techniques are provided for selectively and dynamically determining one or more words of an electronic book to present with comprehension guides. For instance, an electronic device rendering an electronic book may determine whether to display some, all, or no words of the book with comprehension guides for words within the electronic book based on word difficulty, contextual importance or aspec…
Who is the assignee on this patent?
Amazon Tech Inc
What technology area does this patent fall under?
Primary CPC classification G06F17/30011. Mapped technology areas include Physics.
When was this patent published?
Publication date Tue Dec 20 2016 00:00:00 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) (B2). Legal status and post-grant events are not shown on this page.
What related patents are in patentsdb?
We list 8 related publications on this page (citations in our corpus or others sharing the same primary CPC).