Using mock tokens to protect against malicious activity

US9516059B1 · US · B1

Patent metadata
FieldValue
Publication numberUS-9516059-B1
Application numberUS-201113170732-A
CountryUS
Kind codeB1
Filing dateJun 28, 2011
Priority dateJun 28, 2011
Publication dateDec 6, 2016
Grant dateDec 6, 2016

How to read this patent

A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.

  1. Title

    What the patent document calls the invention.

  2. Abstract

    A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.

  3. Assignees and inventors

    Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.

  4. Key dates

    Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.

  5. First independent claim

    The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.

  6. CPC / IPC classifications

    Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.

  7. Citations and related patents

    Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.

Abstract

Official abstract text for this publication.

A technique provides protection against malicious activity. The technique involves providing a mock token to fraudster equipment. The mock token appears to be a legitimate user token that identifies a legitimate user (e.g., an actual user token, a token seed, etc.). The technique further involves receiving, from the fraudster equipment, an authentication request which uses the mock token and, in response to receiving the authentication request which uses the mock token from the fraudster equipment, performing a set of authentication server operations to protect against future activity by the fraudster equipment (e.g., deny access to the fraudster equipment, acquire specific information about the fraudster equipment, output a message to subscribers of an eFraud network, and so on).

First claim

Opening claim text (preview).

What is claimed is: 1. A method of fraud protection, the method comprising: providing a first mock token to first suspected fraudster equipment in response to a first phishing attempt, the mock token appearing to be a legitimate user token that identifies a legitimate user, wherein no legitimate token is provided to the first suspected fraudster equipment in response to the first phishing attempt, and storing the first mock token in a first database entry associated with the legitimate user and the first suspected fraudster; providing a second mock token to a second suspected fraudster equipment in response to a second phishing attempt, the mock token appearing to be a legitimate user token that identifies a legitimate user, wherein no legitimate token is provided to the second suspected fraudster equipment in response to the second phishing attempt, and storing the second mock token in a second database entry associated with the legitimate user and the second suspected fraudster; subsequent to providing the first and second mock tokens, receiving, from suspected fraudster equipment, an authentication request which includes one of the first and second mock tokens stored in the database, thereby identifying the suspected fraudster equipment as a true fraudster; and in response to receiving the authentication request which uses the mock token from the true fraudster, performing a set of authentication server operations to protect against future activity by the true fraudster; wherein each legitimate token is derived from a secret seed uniquely associated with a corresponding legitimate user account; wherein providing the first mock token to the first suspected fraudster equipment in response to the first phishing attempt includes providing log-in information falsely appearing to allow access to a legitimate user account; and wherein the method further includes performing an authentication operation which detects an attempt to use of one of the first and second mock tokens to prove authorization to access the legitimate user account; and wherein performing the set of authentication server operations further includes performing a remedial operation in response to detected use of the mock token, wherein performing the remedial operation in response to detected use of one of the first and second mock tokens includes: outputting a message to a set of authentication servers, the message identifying the fraudster equipment as a source of malicious activity, wherein the set of authentication servers includes a plurality of authentication servers which each control access to protected resources. 2. A method as in claim 1 wherein a mock token list includes a set of mock token entries corresponding to a set of mock tokens; and wherein performing the authentication operation which detects use of one of the first and second mock tokens includes: during the authentication operation, matching the mock token to a particular mock token entry of the mock token list. 3. A method as in claim 1 wherein performing the remedial operation in response to detected use of one of the first and second mock tokens includes: preventing the fraudster equipment from accessing a protected resource. 4. A method as in claim 1 wherein performing the remedial operation in response to detected use of one of the first and second mock tokens includes: communicating with the fraudster to obtain device-specific information. 5. A method as in claim 1 wherein performing the remedial operation in response to detected use of one of the first and second mock tokens includes: preventing the fraudster equipment from accessing a protected resource; and communicating with the fraudster equipment to obtain device-specific information. 6. A method as in claim 1 wherein providing the mock token to the fraudster equipment includes placing the mock token in a database that is accessible by the fraudster equipment in an unauthorized manner prior to receiving an attack. 7. A method as in claim 1 wherein: providing the first mock token includes generating the first mock token to be fake and detectable, and distributing the first mock token at locations that are susceptible to theft of sensitive data; and wherein the first mock token provides the fraudster equipment with a code that appears to allow access via a login operation to a protected resource, the code, in actuality, not providing access to the protected resource. 8. A method as in claim 1 wherein providing the first mock token to fraudster equipment includes using the first mock token in a login attempt on the first suspected phishing fraudster equipment prior to receiving an attack. 9. A method as in claim 1 wherein providing the first mock token to suspected fraudster equipment includes attempting to log onto the first suspected fraudster equipment in response to receiving a phishing attempt message including a link to the first suspected fraudster equipment. 10. A method as in claim 1 wherein in response to receiving the authentication request which uses the mock token from the true fraudster, the method further includes performing adaptive risk-based authentication. 11. A method as in claim 1 wherein: the authentication servers of the set of authentication servers are eFraud network (EFN) subscriber authentication servers, each EFN subscriber authentication server being remote from its respective protected resources; and outputting the message includes sending the message from an EFN controller over a network connection to the EFN subscriber authentication servers of the set of authentication servers. 12. A computer program product having a non-transitory computer readable medium which stores a set of instructions that, when performed by a computerized device, cause the computerized device to: provide a first mock token to a first suspected fraudster equipment in response to a first phishing attempt, the first mock token appearing to be a legitimate user token that identifies a legitimate user, wherein no legitimate user token is provided to the first suspected fraudster equipment in response to a first phishing attempt, and storing the first mock token in a first database entry associated with the legitimate user and the first suspected fraudster; provide a second mock token to a second suspected fraudster equipment in response to a second phishing attempt, the mock token appearing to be a legitimate user token that identifies a legitimate user, wherein no legitimate token is provided to the second suspected fraudster equipment in response to a second phishing attempt, and store the second mock token in a second database entry associated with the legitimate user and the second suspected fraudster; subsequent to providing the first and second mock tokens, receive, from suspected fraudster equipment, an authentication request which includes the first mock token stored in the database, thereby identifying the suspected fraudster equipment as a true fraudster; and in response to receiving the authentication request which uses the mock token from the true fraudster, perform a set of authentication server operations to protect against future activity by the true fraudster; wherein each legitimate token is derived from a secret seed uniquely associated with a corresponding legitimate user account; wherein the first mock token includes log-in information falsely appearing to provide access to a legitimate user account; wherein performing the set of authentication server operations includes: performing an authentication operation which detects an attempt to use of one of the first and second mock tokens to prove authorization to access the legiti

Assignees

Inventors

Classifications

  • service impersonation, e.g. phishing, pharming or web spoofing (detection of rogue wireless access points H04W12/12) · CPC title

  • using deception as countermeasure, e.g. honeypots, honeynets, decoys or entrapment · CPC title

  • using tickets, e.g. Kerberos (cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for entity authentication using tickets or tokens H04L9/3213) · CPC title

Patent family

Related publications grouped by family.

External sources

Frequently asked questions

Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.

What does patent US9516059B1 cover?
A technique provides protection against malicious activity. The technique involves providing a mock token to fraudster equipment. The mock token appears to be a legitimate user token that identifies a legitimate user (e.g., an actual user token, a token seed, etc.). The technique further involves receiving, from the fraudster equipment, an authentication request which uses the mock token and, i…
Who is the assignee on this patent?
Dotan Yedidya, Friedman Lawrence N, Monovich Amit, and 2 more
What technology area does this patent fall under?
Primary CPC classification H04L63/1491. Mapped technology areas include Electricity.
When was this patent published?
Publication date Tue Dec 06 2016 00:00:00 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) (B1). Legal status and post-grant events are not shown on this page.
What related patents are in patentsdb?
We list 8 related publications on this page (citations in our corpus or others sharing the same primary CPC).