Method and device for controlling the reference speed of a down-hill speed controller
US-2015191170-A1 · Jul 9, 2015 · US
US9511668B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9511668-B2 |
| Application number | US-201114365361-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Dec 22, 2011 |
| Priority date | Dec 22, 2011 |
| Publication date | Dec 6, 2016 |
| Grant date | Dec 6, 2016 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A method for controlling a vehicle's speed, including: acquiring a set speed; determining, using using map and location data, a horizon made of route segments, each with a route characteristic; performing simulation cycles, each including: predicting the speed according to a conventional cruise control, which first prediction depends on the route characteristic; comparing the first predicted speed with lower and upper limit values, which define an engine torque for use in the next simulation cycle; making a second prediction of the speed when the engine torque depends on the comparison in the immediately preceding simulation cycle; comparing, as a second comparison, the second predicted speed with second lower and upper limit values, which delineate a speed range within which the speed is maintained; determining, based on the second comparison and/or the second predicted speed in this simulation cycle, a reference value for use by a vehicle control system.
Opening claim text (preview).
The invention claimed is: 1. A method for controlling a speed of a vehicle based on at least one reference value, the method comprising: acquiring a set speed for the vehicle; determining a horizon for an itinerary of the vehicle by reference to map data and location data, which horizon comprises one or more route segments, each route segment having at least one route characteristic; performing, by a module comprising an automated processor, a number of simulation cycles s j , each simulation cycle comprising a number of simulation steps conducted at a predetermined rate, the simulation steps comprising: making a first prediction of the speed of the vehicle according to a conventional cruise control when the set speed is imparted as the reference speed wherein the first prediction depends on the at least one route characteristic of said route segment; comparing, as a first comparison, the first predicted speed with at least one of first lower and upper limit values and, wherein the first lower and upper limit values define an engine torque for use in an immediately following simulation cycle s j+1 ; making a second prediction of the speed of the vehicle, wherein an engine torque is a value which depends on a result of said first comparison in the immediately preceding simulation cycle s j−1 ; comparing, as a second comparison, the second predicted speed of the vehicle with at least one of second lower and upper limit values, wherein the second lower and upper limit values delineate a speed range within which the speed of the vehicle is maintained; determining the at least one reference value based on said second comparison and/or the second predicted vehicle speed in this simulation cycle s j ; and outputting to a control system of the vehicle said at least one reference value, and regulating a speed of the vehicle accordingly. 2. A method according to claim 1 , wherein each of said simulation steps has a step length which depends on the speed of the vehicle. 3. A method according to claim 1 , wherein said at least one reference value is at least one of the following: a reference vehicle speed v ref , a reference torque T ref , and a reference engine speed ω ref . 4. A method according to claim 1 , wherein the engine torque in the second prediction is a torque required to retard the vehicle below the first predicted vehicle speed in this simulation cycle s j when this first predicted speed is determined to be above the first upper limit value in an immediately preceding simulation cycle s j+1 . 5. A method according to claim 4 , wherein said at least one reference value is at least one reference value determined during a previous simulation cycle s j−n when the second predicted vehicle speed is below the second lower limit value in said second comparison. 6. A method according to claim 4 , wherein a highest first predicted vehicle speed and a lowest first predicted vehicle speed are determined during the first prediction of the speed of the vehicle according to a conventional cruise control, which highest and lowest first predicted speeds are then used in the first comparison with the respective first lower and upper limit values to determine the engine torque T in the second prediction. 7. A method according to claim 1 , wherein the engine torque in the second prediction is a torque required to accelerate the vehicle above the first predicted vehicle speed in this simulation cycle s j when this first predicted speed is determined to be below the first lower limit value in the immediately preceding simulation cycle s j−1 . 8. A method according to claim 7 , wherein said at least one reference value is the at least one reference value determined during a previous simulation cycle s j−n when the second predicted vehicle speed is above the second upper limit value in said second comparison. 9. A method according to claim 1 , wherein the method further comprises applying a hysteresis to said at least one reference value. 10. A method according to claim 1 , wherein the method further comprises applying rules to determine the at least one reference value. 11. A method according to claim 10 , wherein a rule is that the at least one reference value is the set speed when the second predicted vehicle speed in the second comparison is above the second upper limit value or below the second lower limit value. 12. A method according to claim 10 , wherein the at least one reference value is the second predicted speed when both following conditions are true: (a) a minimum value for this second predicted speed is equal to or above the second lower limit value, and (b) a maximum value for the second predicted speed is equal to or above a further upper limit value, wherein the further upper limit value corresponds to the set speed plus a constant. 13. A method according to claim 10 , wherein the at least one reference value is the second predicted vehicle speed when both following conditions are true: (a) a maximum value for this second predicted speed is equal to or below the upper limit value, and (b) a minimum value for the second predicted speed is equal to or below a further lower limit value, wherein the further lower limit value corresponds to a set speed minus a constant. 14. A method according to claim 1 , wherein at least one further prediction of the speed of the vehicle is made in each simulation cycle s j , each such further prediction of the speed of the vehicle being based on a torque which is required to raise the speed of the vehicle above the first predicted vehicle speed, or on a torque which is required to lower the speed of the vehicle below the first predicted speed, and the torque on which the at least one further prediction is based depends on said first comparison in the immediately preceding simulation cycle s j−1 . 15. A method according to claim 14 , wherein a total of three different predictions v pred _ cc , v pred _ Tnew and v pred _ Tk+new of the speed are made. 16. A method according to claim 1 , wherein a speed profile v, energy consumption E N and journey time t N of the vehicle are calculated during each prediction. 17. A method according to claim 16 , wherein the simulations are evaluated by calculating a cost for the second predicted vehicle speed and/or a third predicted vehicle speed. 18. A method according to claim 17 , wherein the cost is calculated by employing cost functions J Tnew and J Tk+new for the second predicted vehicle speed and a third predicted vehicle speed, wherein the cost functions J Tnew and J Tk+new , respectively, use weighting with a weighting parameter β, of energy reductions and journey time reductions relative to the first predicted speed. 19. A method according to claim 18 , wherein the method further comprises: comparing, as a fourth comparison, the cost functions J Tnew and J Tk+new for the second predicted vehicle speed and for a third predicted vehicle speed; and determining based on the fourth comparison the reference value. 20. A method according to claim 16 , further comprising: adding a penalty to at least one of the cost functions J Tnew , J Tk+new for the second predicted vehicle speed, and for a third predicted vehicle speed, when the second and third predicted speeds reach different final speeds. 21. The method of claim 1 , wherein the method is performed according to instructions incorporated on a non-transitory computer-readable medium product when the instructions are run on a processor.
Road profile, i.e. the change in elevation or curvature of a plurality of continuous road segments · CPC title
Vehicle fittings, acting on a single sub-unit only, for automatically controlling vehicle speed, i.e. preventing speed from exceeding an arbitrarily established velocity or maintaining speed at a particular velocity, as selected by the vehicle operator · CPC title
Speed control (B60W30/16 takes precedence) · CPC title
{Adaptive} cruise control · CPC title
Speed · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.