Elevator car assignment strategy that limits a number of stops per passenger

US9505584B2 · US · B2

Patent metadata
FieldValue
Publication numberUS-9505584-B2
Application numberUS-201114232621-A
CountryUS
Kind codeB2
Filing dateJul 15, 2011
Priority dateJul 15, 2011
Publication dateNov 29, 2016
Grant dateNov 29, 2016

How to read this patent

A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.

  1. Title

    What the patent document calls the invention.

  2. Abstract

    A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.

  3. Assignees and inventors

    Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.

  4. Key dates

    Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.

  5. First independent claim

    The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.

  6. CPC / IPC classifications

    Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.

  7. Citations and related patents

    Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.

Abstract

Official abstract text for this publication.

An exemplary method of controlling an elevator system includes determining that a new passenger requests elevator service from a departure floor to a destination floor. Any candidate elevator cars are ranked. A number of stops for each assigned passenger for a ranked candidate elevator car is determined if the new passenger were assigned to that car. A determination is made whether any ranked candidate elevator car is a qualified car that can accept the new passenger and limit a number of stops for each passenger assigned to that car to a desired maximum number of stops. The new passenger is assigned to a qualified car that has a most favorable ranking of any qualified cars.

First claim

Opening claim text (preview).

We claim: 1. A method of controlling an elevator system, comprising the steps of: determining that a new passenger requests elevator service from a departure floor to a destination floor; ranking any candidate elevator cars based on at least one criterion; determining a number of stops for each assigned passenger for a ranked candidate elevator car if the new passenger is assigned to the ranked candidate elevator car; determining whether any ranked candidate elevator car is a qualified car that can accept the new passenger and limit a number of stops for each passenger assigned to the qualified car to a desired maximum number of stops; and assigning the new passenger to a qualified car that has a most favorable ranking of any qualified cars. 2. The method of claim 1 , wherein none of the ranked candidate elevator cars is a qualified car for a current elevator system condition and the method comprises assigning the new passenger to one of the candidate elevator cars based on at least one different criterion. 3. The method of claim 2 , comprising at least temporarily increasing the desired maximum number of stops to a higher maximum for at least one of the passengers; determining whether any ranked candidate elevator car is a qualified car that can accept the new passenger and limit a number of stops for the at least one of the passengers assigned to the qualified car to the higher maximum number; and assigning the new passenger to a qualified car that has a most favorable ranking of any qualified cars. 4. The method of claim 3 , comprising at least one of increasing the desired maximum number of stops for at least one of the passengers differently than at least one other passenger; or increasing the desired maximum number of stops for any passenger assigned to at least one of the elevator cars differently than any passenger assigned to at least one other elevator car. 5. The method of claim 2 , wherein the at least one other criterion comprises at least one of a wait time for a passenger to board an elevator car, an in-car time for a passenger, a number of assigned passengers for an elevator car or a current direction of travel of an elevator car. 6. The method of claim 1 , comprising using a first desired maximum number of stops for at least one passenger that is different than a second desired maximum number of stops for at least one other passenger. 7. The method of claim 1 , comprising selecting the desired maximum number of stops for a selected passenger depending on at least one of a departure floor of the selected passenger, a destination floor of the selected passenger, a time of day when the request is received from the selected passenger, a direction of travel of the selected passenger, or a status or identification of the selected passenger. 8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the at least one criterion comprises at least one of a wait time for a passenger to board an elevator car, an in-car time for a passenger, a number of assigned passengers for a car or a current direction of travel of a car. 9. The method of claim 1 , comprising at least temporarily increasing the desired maximum number of stops to a higher maximum for at least one of the passengers; determining whether any ranked candidate elevator car is a qualified car that can accept the new passenger and limit a number of stops for the at least one of the passengers assigned to the qualified car to the higher maximum number; and assigning the new passenger to a qualified car that has a most favorable ranking of any qualified cars. 10. The method of claim 1 , comprising minimizing the number of stops for each of the assigned passengers for as many of the candidate elevator cars as possible. 11. An elevator system, comprising: a plurality of elevator cars; and a controller that is configured to determine that a new passenger requests elevator service from a departure floor to a destination floor; rank any candidate elevator cars based on at least one criterion; determine a number of stops for each assigned passenger for a ranked candidate elevator car if the new passenger is assigned to the ranked candidate elevator car; determine whether any ranked candidate elevator car is a qualified car that can accept the new passenger and limit a number of stops for each passenger assigned to the qualified car to a desired maximum number of stops; and assign the new passenger to a qualified car that has a most favorable ranking of any qualified cars. 12. The elevator system of claim 11 , wherein none of the ranked elevator cars is a qualified car for a current elevator system condition and the controller is configured to assign the new passenger to one of the candidate elevator cars based on at least one different criterion. 13. The elevator system of claim 12 , wherein the controller is configured to at least temporarily increase the desired maximum number of stops to a higher maximum for at least one of the passengers; determine whether any ranked candidate elevator car is a qualified car that can accept a new passenger and limit a number of stops for the at least one of the passengers assigned to the qualified car to the higher maximum number; and assign the new passenger to a qualified car that has a most favorable ranking of any qualified cars. 14. The elevator system of claim 13 , wherein the controller is configured to increase the desired maximum number of stops for at least one of the passengers differently than at least one other passenger; or increase the desired maximum number of stops for any passenger assigned to at least one of the elevator cars differently than any passenger assigned to at least one other elevator car. 15. The elevator system of claim 12 , wherein the at least one other criterion comprises at least one of a wait time for a passenger to board an elevator car, an in-car time for a passenger, a number of assigned passengers for an elevator car, or a current direction of travel of an elevator car. 16. The elevator system of claim 11 , wherein the controller is configured to use a first desired maximum number of stops for at least one passenger that is different than a second desired maximum number of stops for at least one other passenger. 17. The elevator system of claim 11 , wherein the controller is configured to select the desired maximum number of stops for a selected passenger depending on at least one of a departure floor of the selected passenger, a destination floor of the selected passenger, a time of day when the request is received from the selected passenger, a direction of travel of the selected passenger, or a status of the selected passenger. 18. The elevator system of claim 11 , wherein the at least one criterion comprises at least one of a wait time for a passenger to board an elevator car, an in-car time for a passenger, a number of assigned passengers for a car or a current direction of travel of a car. 19. The elevator system of claim 18 , wherein the controller is configured to at least temporarily increase the desired maximum number of stops to a higher maximum for at least one of the passengers; determine whether any ranked candidate elevator car is a qualified car that can accept the new passenger and limit a number of stops for the at least one of the passengers assigned to the qualified car to the higher maximum number; and assign the new passenger to a qualified car that has a most favorable ranking of any qualified cars.

Assignees

Inventors

Classifications

  • Energy consumption · CPC title

  • where the number of stops is limited · CPC title

  • Travel time · CPC title

  • B66B1/20Primary

    and for varying the manner of operation to suit particular traffic conditions, e.g. "one-way rush-hour traffic" {(B66B1/2466 takes precedence)} · CPC title

  • B66B1/18Primary

    with means for storing pulses controlling the movements of several cars or cages {(B66B1/2458 takes precedence)} · CPC title

Patent family

Related publications grouped by family.

External sources

Frequently asked questions

Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.

What does patent US9505584B2 cover?
An exemplary method of controlling an elevator system includes determining that a new passenger requests elevator service from a departure floor to a destination floor. Any candidate elevator cars are ranked. A number of stops for each assigned passenger for a ranked candidate elevator car is determined if the new passenger were assigned to that car. A determination is made whether any ranked c…
Who is the assignee on this patent?
Faruki Tarique, Stanley Jannah A, Chapman Ashley, and 1 more
What technology area does this patent fall under?
Primary CPC classification B66B1/20. Mapped technology areas include Operations & Transport.
When was this patent published?
Publication date Tue Nov 29 2016 00:00:00 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) (B2). Legal status and post-grant events are not shown on this page.
What related patents are in patentsdb?
We list 2 related publications on this page (citations in our corpus or others sharing the same primary CPC).