Non-intrusive exhaust gas sensor monitoring
US-9074513-B2 · Jul 7, 2015 · US
US9500151B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9500151-B2 |
| Application number | US-201414174806-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Feb 6, 2014 |
| Priority date | Feb 6, 2014 |
| Publication date | Nov 22, 2016 |
| Grant date | Nov 22, 2016 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A method for monitoring an exhaust gas sensor coupled in an engine exhaust is provided. In one embodiment, the method comprises indicating exhaust gas sensor degradation based on shape of a distribution of extreme values of a plurality of sets of lambda differentials collected during selected operating conditions. In this way, the exhaust gas sensor may be monitored in a non-intrusive manner.
Opening claim text (preview).
The invention claimed is: 1. A method of monitoring an exhaust gas sensor coupled in an engine exhaust, comprising: indicating, via a controller coupled to the exhaust gas sensor, a type of exhaust gas sensor degradation based on a shape of a distribution of extreme values of a plurality of sets of lambda differentials collected by the controller based on readings from the exhaust gas sensor during selected operating conditions, the shape identified via the controller based on an iterative search that successively narrows a range of values inside which the shape exists. 2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the distribution is a generalized extreme value (GEV) distribution, and wherein the degradation is further based on a central peak of the GEV distribution. 3. The method of claim 2 , wherein if a magnitude of the central peak is greater than a threshold, indicating an asymmetric delay sensor degradation. 4. The method of claim 3 , wherein if an expected mean air/fuel ratio is greater than a determined mean air/fuel ratio at idle, indicating a rich to lean delay sensor degradation, and if the expected mean air/fuel ratio is less than the determined mean air/fuel ratio at idle, indicating a lean to rich delay sensor degradation. 5. The method of claim 3 , wherein if the magnitude of the central peak is less than the threshold and the shape is outside a symmetric range, indicating an asymmetric response sensor degradation. 6. The method of claim 5 , wherein if the shape is less than the symmetric range, indicating a rich to lean response sensor degradation, and if the shape is greater than the symmetric range, indicating a lean to rich response sensor degradation. 7. The method of claim 5 , wherein if the shape is in the symmetric range, indicating no degradation or a symmetric sensor degradation. 8. The method of claim 7 , further comprising indicating a symmetric delay sensor degradation if a determined time delay is greater than a nominal time delay, and indicating a symmetric slow response sensor degradation if a determined time constant is greater than a nominal time constant. 9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the selected operating conditions further comprise steady state operating conditions. 10. The method of claim 1 , further comprising adjusting, via the controller, a fuel injection amount and/or timing based on the indicated type of exhaust gas sensor degradation, wherein the shape is based on a golden section search of data sorted in an ascending or descending order. 11. A system for a vehicle, comprising: an engine including a fuel injection system; an exhaust gas sensor coupled in an exhaust system of the engine; and a controller including instructions executable to: indicate exhaust gas sensor degradation based on an iteratively identified shape of a distribution of extreme values of a plurality of sets of lambda differentials collected during steady-state engine operation; and adjust an amount and/or timing of fuel injection based on the indicated sensor degradation. 12. The system of claim 11 , wherein the instructions are further executable to notify an operator of the vehicle if the indicated sensor degradation exceeds a threshold. 13. The system of claim 11 , wherein the shape is determined from a golden section search. 14. A method of monitoring an oxygen sensor coupled in an engine exhaust, comprising: indicating, via a controller coupled to the oxygen sensor, an asymmetric delay sensor degradation if a shape of a distribution of extreme values of a plurality of sets of lambda differentials exceeds a first threshold; and indicating, via the controller, an asymmetric slow response sensor degradation if the shape is below the first threshold and a second characteristic of the distribution is outside a second threshold range, the shape based on successively narrowing a range of values in which the shape is located. 15. The method of claim 14 , wherein the indications are further based on a magnitude of a central peak of the distribution. 16. The method of claim 15 , wherein the shape is based on a golden section search. 17. The method of claim 16 , wherein a larger shape value indicates lean-to-rich sensor degradation asymmetry, and a smaller shape value indicates rich-to-lean degradation asymmetry. 18. The method of claim 14 , further comprising adjusting, via the controller, a fuel injection amount based on the indicated sensor degradation. 19. The method of claim 14 , wherein the lambda differentials are collected during steadystate operating conditions.
comprising means for signal processing · CPC title
Warning displays · CPC title
relating to the failure of sensors or parameter detection devices · CPC title
the characteristics being an oxygen content or concentration or the air-fuel ratio · CPC title
for idling (F02D41/06, F02D41/16 take precedence) · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.