Cast refiner plate segment with blunt edges and corners for safe handling
US-10501888-B2 · Dec 10, 2019 · US
US9498809B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9498809-B2 |
| Application number | US-201414523196-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Oct 24, 2014 |
| Priority date | Nov 6, 2013 |
| Publication date | Nov 22, 2016 |
| Grant date | Nov 22, 2016 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A metallic matrix shaping method is provided. A flatness of a plurality of points of the metallic matrix is measured by a shape test device, and a flatness margin of error H between a reference level and the flatness of the metallic matrix is calibrated using the least square method. A controller determines whether the points of the metallic matrix need to be shaped by comparing the flatness margin of error H and a permissive error range K. The controller calibrates a descending distance P by a mathematical formula of P=M+[(H−K)/D]/N+L. A shaping device shapes the metallic matrix according to the descending distance P and a shaping time. The above steps are repeated until the flatness of the metal is within the permissive error range K.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A shaping method for a metallic matrix comprising: measuring a flatness of a plurality of points of the metallic matrix by a shape test device, and calibrating a flatness margin of error H between a reference level and the flatness of the metallic matrix using a least square method; providing a controller electrically connected to the shape test device, and presetting a permissive error range K in the controller, the controller comparing the flatness margin of error H with the permissive error range K, if the flatness margin of error H being within the permissive error range K, the metallic matrix does not need to be shaped, if the flatness margin of error H is out of the permissive error range K, the metallic matrix needs to be shaped; presetting a shaping base level in the controller, the controller determining a first position and a second position by comparing the shaping base level with the reference level, and the first position being coplanar with the shaping base level and the reference level, the second position being non-coplanar with the shaping base level and the reference level; the controller calibrating a descending distance P by a mathematical formula of P=M+[(H−T)/D]/N+L according to material characteristics of the metallic matrix, with P being a descending distance, H being a flatness error, T being a maximum of the permissive error range K, N being a shaping time, L being a compensation of the descending distance P, M being a deformation threshold of the metallic matrix, and D being an each distance increase in an adjusted shaping value for every 1 mm increase in the descending distance P; providing a shaping device electrically connected to the controller, the shaping device having a pivot shaft and a descending shaft, the pivot shaft abutting the first position, and the descending shaft abutting the second position, the descending shaft pressing the second position according to the descending distance P to realize the shaping; and repeating until the flatness margin of error H of the metallic matrix is within the permissive error range K. 2. The shaping method for the metallic matrix as claimed in claim 1 , wherein a plurality of predetermined shaping times relative to the flatness margin of error H are preset in the controller, and the controller calibrates the shaping time N of the second position by the flatness margin of error H and the predetermined shaping times. 3. The shaping method for the metallic matrix as claimed in claim 2 , wherein when the flatness margin of error H is greater than 0.4 mm and is less than or equal to 0.6 mm, the predetermined shaping time is one; when the flatness margin of error H is greater than 0.6 mm and is less than or equal to 0.8 mm, the predetermined shaping time is two; and when the flatness margin of error H is greater than 0.8 mm and is less than or equal to 1.0 mm, the predetermined shaping time is three. 4. The shaping method for the metallic matrix as claimed in claim 1 , wherein a maximal error is preset in the controller, the controller determines whether the metallic matrix needs to be shaped by comparing the flatness margin of error H with the permissive error range K and the maximal error; and if the flatness margin of error H is out of the permissive error range K and is smaller than the maximal error, the controller determines the metallic matrix needs to be shaped, and if the flatness margin of error H is greater than the maximal error, the controller determines the metallic matrix needs to be reshaped. 5. The shaping method for the metallic matrix as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the plurality of points of the metallic matrix is measured by the shape test device, a least square level of the measured metallic matrix is the reference level; the least square level is a level that allows a sum of squared distances between the plurality of points of the metallic matrix and the least square level to be minimal; and a distance between two levels parallel with the least square level is a flatness margin of error H. 6. The shaping method for the metallic matrix as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the deformation threshold M, the compensation L, and the adjusted shaping value D are preset in the controller according to material characteristics of the metallic matrix. 7. The shaping method for the metallic matrix as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the metallic matrix is an aluminum substrate. 8. The shaping method for the metallic matrix as claimed in claim 7 , wherein each 0.05 mm increases in the adjusted shaping value D for every 1 mm increasing in the descending distance P. 9. The shaping method for the metallic matrix as claimed in claim 7 , wherein the permissive error range K is less than or equal to 0.4 mm. 10. The shaping method for the metallic matrix as claimed in claim 1 , wherein a maximum of the descending distance P is preset in the controller, and the descending distance P is smaller than the maximum.
by rollers · CPC title
Straightening, restoring form or removing local distortions of sheet metal or specific articles made therefrom (B21D3/00 takes precedence); Stretching sheet metal combined with rolling (working sheet metal of limited length by stretching B21D25/00; by localised hammering B21D31/06) · CPC title
Removing local distortions · CPC title
for measuring roughness or irregularity of surfaces · CPC title
Measuring, gauging, indicating, counting, or marking devices specially adapted for use in the production or manipulation of material in accordance with subclasses B21B - B21F · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.