Cased-hole radial profiling of shear parameters from sonic measurements

Patent metadata

Field	Value
Publication number	US-9494705-B2
Application number	US-201213572699-A
Country	US
Kind code	B2
Filing date	Aug 13, 2012
Priority date	Aug 13, 2012
Publication date	Nov 15, 2016
Grant date	Nov 15, 2016

Abstract

Cased-hole radial profiling of shear parameters from sonic measurements is disclosed. Example methods disclosed herein include determining a variation of a first shear modulus at a first radial position from a cased borehole in a formation based on a first weighted average of fractional variations of Stoneley wave velocities for different wavenumbers, the first weighted average based on first weights determined using a perturbation model including parameters to model the borehole casing, and determining variations of second and third shear moduli at respective second and third radial positions from the borehole based on second and third weighted averages of fractional variations of respective first and second flexural wave velocities for different wavenumbers, the first and second flexural wave velocities associated with respective first and second orthogonal borehole axial planes of the formation, the second and third weighted averages based on respective second and third weights determined using the perturbation model.

First claim

What is claimed is:

1. A method to determine a radial profile of shear parameters for a formation including a cased borehole, the method comprising:
measuring Stoneley waveforms and dipole sonic waveforms in the cased borehole by a sonic tool;
determining a fractional variation of a first shear modulus at a first radial position from the borehole based on a first weighted average of fractional variations of Stoneley wave velocities for different wavenumbers, the first weighted average being based on first weights determined using a perturbation model including parameters to model the borehole casing;
determining fractional variations of second and third shear moduli at respective second and third radial positions from the borehole based on second and third weighted averages of fractional variations of respective first and second flexural wave velocities for different wavenumbers, the first and second flexural wave velocities associated with respective first and second orthogonal borehole axial planes of the formation, the second and third weighted averages being based on respective second and third weights determined using the perturbation model;
determining a radial profile of the first shear modulus at a set of radial positions from the borehole in a borehole cross-sectional plane of the formation based on fractional variations of the first shear modulus determined at the respective set of radial positions from the borehole;
determining respective radial profiles of the second and third shear moduli at respective second and third sets of radial positions from the borehole in the respective first and second orthogonal borehole axial planes of the formation based on respective fractional variations of the second and third shear moduli determined at the respective second and third sets of radial positions from the borehole;
determining respective radial profiles of the shear slownesses at the respective second and third sets of radial positions from the borehole in the respective first and second orthogonal borehole axial planes of the formation based on the respective radial profiles of the second and third shear moduli; and
determining the radial profile of the shear parameters for the formation including the cased borehole; wherein the shear parameters comprise the shear moduli and the shear slowness.

2. A method as defined in claim 1 wherein the first shear modulus is associated with a borehole cross-sectional plane of the formation, and the second and third shear moduli are associated respectively with the first and second orthogonal borehole axial planes.

3. A method as defined in claim 2 wherein the first borehole axial plane is associated with a fast flexural shear velocity determinable from the first flexural wave velocities, and the second borehole axial plane is associated with a slow flexural shear velocity determinable from the second flexural wave velocities.

4. A method as defined in claim 1 wherein the fractional variation of the first shear modulus at the first radial position from the borehole comprises a ratio of a difference between an estimated value of the first shear modulus at the first radial position and a reference value of the first shear modulus to the reference value of the first shear modulus, the reference value of the first shear modulus corresponding to a far-field value of the first shear modulus determined from the Stoneley wave velocities assuming the formation is effectively isotropic and radially homogenous, the fractional variations of the Stoneley wave velocities for the different wavenumbers include a first fractional variation of the Stoneley wave velocity for a first wavenumber, the first fractional variation of the Stoneley wave velocity comprises a ratio of a difference between a measured value and a reference value of the Stoneley wave velocity for the first wavenumber to the reference value of the Stoneley wave velocity for the first wavenumber, and the reference value of the Stoneley wave velocity for the first wavenumber is determined assuming the formation is effectively isotropic and radially homogenous.

5. A method as defined in claim 1 wherein the fractional variations of the second and third shear moduli include a fractional variation of the second shear modulus and a fractional variation of the third shear modulus at a first radial position from the borehole, the fractional variation of the second shear modulus comprises a ratio of a difference between an estimated value of the second shear modulus at the first radial position and a reference value of the second shear modulus to the reference value of the second shear modulus, the reference value of the second shear modulus corresponding to a far-field value of the second shear modulus determined from the first flexural wave velocities assuming the formation is effectively isotropic and radially homogenous, the fractional variations of the first flexural wave velocities for the different wavenumbers include a first fractional variation of the first flexural wave velocity for a first wavenumber, the first fractional variation of the first flexural wave velocity comprises a ratio of a difference between a measured value and a reference value of the first flexural wave velocity for the first wavenumber to the reference value of the first flexural wave velocity for the first wavenumber, and the reference value of the first flexural wave velocity for the first wavenumber is determined assuming the formation is effectively isotropic and radially homogenous.

6. A method as defined in claim 5 wherein the fractional variation of the third shear modulus comprises a ratio of a difference between an estimated value of the third shear modulus at the first radial position and a reference value of the third shear modulus to the reference value of the third shear modulus, the reference value of the third shear modulus corresponds to a far-field value of the third shear modulus determined from the second flexural wave velocities assuming the formation is effectively isotropic and radially homogenous, the fractional variations of the second flexural wave velocities for the different wavenumbers include a first fractional variation of the second flexural wave velocity for a first wavenumber, the first fractional variation of the second flexural wave velocity comprises a ratio of a difference between a measured value and a reference value of the second flexural wave velocity for the first wavenumber to the reference value of the second flexural wave velocity for the first wavenumber, and the reference value of the second flexural wave velocity for the first wavenumber is determined assuming the formation is effectively isotropic and radially homogenous.

7. A method as defined in claim 1 further comprising:
determining respective first data kernels for the different wavenumbers using a Stoneley mode solution of the perturbation model;
determining the first weights based on the first data kernels;
determining respective second and third data kernels for the different wavenumbers using respective flexural mode solutions of the perturbation model; and
determining the second and third weights based on the respective second and third data kernels.

8. A method as defined in claim 1 wherein the perturbation model includes parameters to model the borehole casing but not a cement annulus between the borehole casing and the formation.

9. A system to determine a radial profile of shear parameters for a formation including a cased borehole, the system comprising:
a sonic tool to measure Stoneley waveforms and dipole sonic waveforms in the cased borehole; and
a radial profiling processor to:
determine a first radial profile for variations of a first shear modulus at

Assignees

• Sinha Bikash K
• Schlumberger Technology Corp

Inventors

• Sinha Bikash K

Classifications

• G01V1/50 Primary

  Analysing data · CPC title

• G01V1/284

  Application of the shear wave component and/or several components of the seismic signal · CPC title