Asynchronous bridge
US-9183170-B2 · Nov 10, 2015 · US
US9489307B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9489307-B2 |
| Application number | US-201314031390-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Sep 19, 2013 |
| Priority date | Oct 24, 2012 |
| Publication date | Nov 8, 2016 |
| Grant date | Nov 8, 2016 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
An asynchronous dual domain bridge is implemented between the cache coherent master and the coherent system interconnect. The bridge has 2 halves, one in each clock/powerdown domain—master and interconnect. The powerdown mechanism is isolated to just the asynchronous bridge implemented between the master and the interconnect with a basic request/acknowledge handshake between the master subsystem and the asynchronous bridge.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. An asynchronous bridge operable to connect a plurality of clock and powerdown domains, consisting of: a slave interface operable within a slave clock and powerdown domain; a master interface operable within a master clock and powerdown domain; an asynchronous crossing connected to said slave interface and said master interface; wherein upon detecting a powerdown request from a master device connected to said master interface said asynchronous bridge is operable to stop accepting snoop transactions from a slave device connected to said slave interface, automatically responding to in-flight snoop transactions by internally score boarding said in-flight snoop transactions, following automatically responding to all said in-flight snoop transactions, transmitting a powerdown acknowledge signal to the connected master device and powering down said master interface, and following transmitting said powerdown acknowledge signal, automatically responding to snoop requests with a “normal—no data” snoop response while said master interface is in a powerdown mode. 2. The asynchronous bridge of claim 1 wherein: the slave interface is operable to remain active while the master interface is powered down. 3. The asynchronous bridge of claim 1 wherein: the automatically responding to snoop requests with a “normal—no data” snoop response terminates upon detection by the asynchronous bridge that the master interface has powered up and came out of the reset state. 4. The asynchronous bridge of claim 1 wherein: the asynchronous bridge automatically responding to snoop requests with a “normal—no data” snoop response upon system power up with the master held in reset.
Allocation of cache space to multiple users or processors · CPC title
using bus bridges (G06F13/4022 takes precedence) · CPC title
using a bus scheme, e.g. with bus monitoring or watching means · CPC title
Coherency control relating to peripheral accessing, e.g. from DMA or I/O device · CPC title
with data re-ordering, e.g. Endian conversion · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.