Information provision device, information provision system, server, information provision method and program
US-2015070349-A1 · Mar 12, 2015 · US
US9486386B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9486386-B2 |
| Application number | US-201514973315-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Dec 17, 2015 |
| Priority date | Jan 16, 2013 |
| Publication date | Nov 8, 2016 |
| Grant date | Nov 8, 2016 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A method for treating a weak viewer-eye includes the steps of receiving eye-strength data indicative of an eye-strength of the weak viewer-eye and causing a 3D display system to vary, in accordance with the eye-strength of the weak viewer-eye, display characteristics of a perspective that the 3D display system displays.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A 3D display system comprising: a 3D display screen configured to display a plurality of perspectives of an image to a plurality of viewer-eyes; an eye-monitoring system configured to generate eye-strength data, wherein generating the eye-strength data comprises using gaze-tracking data to determine the eye-strength of the weak viewer-eye by tracking the focus of (i) the weak viewer-eye and (ii) a corresponding strong viewer-eye, and determining the relative eye-strength of the weak viewer-eye, with respect to the strong viewer-eye, based at least in part on the tracked focus; a processor; a computer-readable medium; and program instructions stored on the computer-readable medium and executable by the processor to cause the 3D display system to: (i) receive eye-strength data representative of at least the relative eye-strength of the weak viewer-eye with respect to the strong viewer-eye; and (ii) vary, in accordance with the eye-strength of the weak viewer-eye, display characteristics of the perspective of the image to conserve resources without reducing the quality of the displayed 3D image. 2. The 3D display system of claim 1 , wherein the eye-monitoring system is an externally connected eye-monitoring system. 3. The 3D display system of claim 2 , wherein the program instructions are further executable to cause the 3D display system to transmit instructions to the eye-monitoring system, wherein the transmitted instructions cause the eye-monitoring system to (i) detect characteristics of the weak viewer-eye and (ii) generate the eye-strength data, based at least in part on the detected characteristics of the weak viewer-eye. 4. The 3D display system of claim 1 , wherein generating the eye-strength data comprises monitoring the dilation of the weak viewer-eye to determine the eye-strength of the weak viewer-eye. 5. The 3D display system of claim 1 , wherein generating the eye-strength data comprises: using the 3D display system to perform an eye-strength test; and as part of the eye-strength test, receiving user-input indicative of the eye-strength of the weak viewer-eye. 6. The 3D display system of claim 1 , wherein generating the eye-strength data comprises: displaying a first perspective of an image to the weak viewer-eye and a second perspective of the image to a dominant viewer-eye; receiving an indication regarding a quality of a viewer's perceived 3D effect from the images; determining, in accordance with the received indication, data associated with the eye-strength of the weak viewer-eye. 7. The 3D display system of claim 1 , wherein varying, in accordance with the eye-strength of the weak viewer-eye, the display characteristics comprises: evaluating a difference in eye-strength between the weak viewer-eye and a second viewer-eye; determining whether the evaluated difference in eye-strength is larger than a predefined threshold difference in eye-strength; in response to determining that the evaluated difference is larger than the threshold difference, causing the 3D display system to vary the display characteristics. 8. The 3D display system of claim 7 , wherein the program instructions are further executable to cause the 3D display system to: determine whether the evaluated difference in eye-strength is larger than any of a plurality of predefined threshold differences in eye-strength; and in response to determining that the evaluated difference is larger than a particular set of threshold differences of the plurality of threshold differences, cause the 3D display system to vary the display characteristics in accordance with the particular set of threshold differences. 9. The 3D display system of claim 8 , wherein the plurality of threshold differences constitute a substantially continuous set of threshold differences in eye-strength, whereby the display characteristics are varied in accordance with incremental changes in the eye-strength of the weak viewer-eye. 10. A method of training a first viewer-eye, comprising: causing a 3D display system to display a first perspective of an image and a second perspective of the image; generating eye-strength data using an eye-monitoring system, wherein generating the eye-strength data comprises using gaze-tracking data to determine the eye-strength of the first viewer-eye by tracking the focus of (i) the first viewer-eye and (ii) a corresponding second viewer-eye; determining an eye-strength of the first viewer-eye with respect to an eye-strength of the second viewer-eye based at least in part on the tracked focus, wherein the first perspective is intended for display to the first viewer-eye, and wherein the second perspective is intended for display to the second viewer-eye; and varying, based at least in part on the determined eye-strength of the first viewer-eye, display characteristics of at least one of the first perspective and the second perspective to conserve resources without reducing the quality of the displayed image. 11. The method of claim 10 , wherein determining the eye-strength of the first viewer-eye comprises: using the 3D display screen to perform an eye-strength test; and as part of the eye-strength test, receiving user-input indicative of the eye-strength of the first viewer-eye. 12. The method of claim 10 , wherein determining the eye-strength of the first viewer-eye comprises receiving an indication regarding a quality of a viewer's perceived 3D effect from the images, wherein the data associated with the eye-strength of the first viewer-eye is determined in accordance with the received indication. 13. The method of claim 10 , determining the eye-strength of the first viewer-eye comprises receiving user-input indicating at least the eye-strength of the first viewer-eye. 14. The method of claim 10 , further comprising: updating the determined eye-strength of the first viewer-eye; and based at least in part on the updated eye-strength, varying the characteristics of at least one of (i) the first perspective and the (ii) second perspective. 15. The method of claim 10 , wherein the 3D display system comprises a lenticular display screen. 16. The method of claim 10 , wherein the 3D display system comprises a parallax-barrier 3D display screen. 17. The method of claim 10 , wherein the 3D display system comprises a holographic display screen. 18. The method of claim 10 , wherein the 3D display system comprises a directed-beam 3D display screen. 19. The method of claim 10 , wherein the plurality of perspectives is overlaid into a single composite image that is filterable to obtain each of the plurality of perspectives. 20. The method of claim 10 , wherein the varied display characteristics comprise one or more of (a) brightness, (b) spatial resolution, (c) sharpness, (d) complexity, (e) image size, (f) image position, (g) peripheral content, (h) spectral content, (i) color saturation, and (j) temporal resolution. 21. The method of claim 10 , further comprising: determining an eye-strength for each viewer-eye of a first set of additional viewer-eyes with respect to an eye-strength of a corresponding viewer-eye from a second set of additional viewer-eyes, wherein the first perspective is intended for display to each of the first set of viewer-eyes, and wherein the second perspective is intended for display to each of the second set of viewer-eyes; and varying, based at least in part on one of the determined eye-strengths, the display characteristics of at least one of the fir
characterised by user input arrangements · CPC title
with means for monitoring data relating to the user, e.g. head-tracking, eye-tracking · CPC title
Acceleration sensors · CPC title
characterised by electronic signal processing, e.g. eye models · CPC title
wireless · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.