Method for operation of a safety arrangement in a vehicle
US-2016129879-A1 · May 12, 2016 · US
US9457750B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9457750-B2 |
| Application number | US-201414282455-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | May 20, 2014 |
| Priority date | May 27, 2013 |
| Publication date | Oct 4, 2016 |
| Grant date | Oct 4, 2016 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A method performed by a retraction control system of a vehicle for controlling refraction of a seat belt of a reversible seat belt refractor arrangement for a vehicle occupant is provided. The control system determines fulfillment of an activation condition based on an initiating input derived from a vehicle situation sensing system, which initiating input indicates that the vehicle, at an initiating time instant, is considered likely to be, or is about to become, involved in a hazardous situation and/or uncomfortable dynamic situation. The control system generates an activation signal utilizable for initiation of retraction of the seat belt. If the control system determines absence of fulfillment of a confirming condition within a predetermined confirming time period, and/or if the control system determines fulfillment of an abort condition within a predetermined abort time period, the control system generates a deactivation signal utilizable for aborting the initiation.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A method performed by a retraction control system of a vehicle for controlling retraction of a seat belt of a reversible seat belt retractor arrangement for a vehicle occupant, the method comprising: determining fulfillment of an activation condition (C-Activate) based on an initiating input derived from a vehicle situation sensing system, the initiating input indicating that the vehicle, at an initiating time instant, is considered likely to be involved in at least one of a hazardous situation or a non-standard dynamic situation; generating, by the retraction control system, an activation signal (S-Activation) utilizable by the reversible seat belt retractor arrangement for initiation of retraction of the seat belt; and upon determining at least one of absence of fulfillment of a confirming condition (C-confirm) within a predetermined confirming time period (ΔC), or fulfillment of an abort condition (C-Abort) within a predetermined abort time period (ΔA), generating, by the retraction control system, a deactivation signal (S-Deactivation) that is utilized by the reversible seat belt retractor arrangement for aborting the initiation of retraction of the seat belt; wherein the confirming time period (ΔC), if utilized. and the abort time period (ΔA), if utilized, respectively fall within a predetermined non-restraining time period (ΔN-R) characterizing the reversible seat belt retractor arrangement, during which non-restraining time period (ΔN-R) no restraining force is applied by the reversible seat belt retractor arrangement by means of the seat belt to the vehicle occupant after generation of the activation signal (S-Activation). 2. The method according to claim 1 wherein the non-restraining time period (ΔN-R) lasts for up to 200 milliseconds, and wherein start of the non-restraining time period (ΔN-R) is counted from start of the initiation of retraction of the seat belt. 3. The method according to claim 1 wherein the non-restraining time period (ΔN-R) lasts for up to 100 milliseconds, and wherein start of the non-restraining time period (ΔN-R) is counted from start of the initiation of retraction of the seat belt. 4. The method according to claim 1 wherein the non-restraining time period (ΔN-R) lasts for up to 50 milliseconds, and wherein start of the non-restraining time period (ΔN-R) is counted from start of the initiation of retraction of the seat belt. 5. The method according to claim 1 wherein the confirming time period (ΔC) or the abort time period (ΔA) is equal to the non-restraining time period (ΔN-R). 6. The method according to claim 1 wherein the hazardous situation and/or non-standard dynamic situation refers to a road departure situation. 7. The method according to claim 1 wherein fulfillment of the confirming condition (C-Confirm) is based on a confirming input derived from the vehicle situation sensing system, the confirming input indicating that the vehicle, at a confirming time instant occurring later than the initiating time instant, still is considered likely to be involved in at least one of a hazardous situation or a non-standard dynamic situation. 8. The method according to claim 1 wherein fulfillment of the abort condition (C-Abort) is based on an aborting input derived from the vehicle situation sensing system, the aborting input indicating that the vehicle, at an aborting time instant occurring later than the initiating time instant, is considered unlikely to be, or about to become, involved in at least one of a hazardous situation or a non-standard dynamic situation. 9. The method according to claim 1 wherein the determining fulfillment of the activation condition (C-Activate) comprises determining fulfillment of an activation condition (C-Activate) based on an initiating input derived from a vehicle situation sensing system comprising one or more collision avoidance sensors. 10. The method according to claim 9 wherein the one or more collision avoidance sensors comprise one or more of radar, IR, ultrasonic, vision based or lidar sensors; vehicle dynamics sensors; or further sensors associated with one or several airbags of the vehicle. 11. The method according to claim 1 further comprising: upon determining fulfillment of a reset condition (C-Reset), generating the deactivation signal (S-Deactivation) utilizable for aborting the initiation of retraction of the seat belt. 12. The method according to claim 11 wherein fulfillment of the reset condition (C-Reset) is based on a reset input derived from the vehicle situation sensing system, the reset condition (C-Reset) indicating that the vehicle, at a reset time instant occurring later than the initiating time instant, no longer is considered to be involved in at least one of a hazardous situation or a non-standard dynamic situation. 13. The method according to claim 1 wherein the activation signal (S-Activation) and the deactivation signal (S-Deactivation) are represented by a common signal (S-Common), which common signal (S-Common) is toggled to indicate respectively the activation signal (S-Activation) and the deactivation signal (S-Deactivation). 14. A retraction control system of a vehicle for controlling retraction of a seat belt of a reversible seat belt retractor arrangement for a vehicle occupant, the retraction control system comprising: a processing unit including a processor that is operable to execute code such that the retraction control system is operable to determine fulfillment of an activation condition (C-Activate) based on an initiating input derived from a vehicle situation sensing system, the initiating input indicating that the vehicle, at an initiating time instant, is considered likely to be involved in at least one of a hazardous situation or a non-standard dynamic situation; generate an activation signal (S-Activation) utilizable by the reversible seat belt retractor arrangement for initiation of retraction of the seat belt; and generate a deactivation signal (S-Deactivation) that is utilized by the reversible seat belt retractor arrangement for aborting the initiation of retraction of the seat belt if at least one of absence of fulfillment of a confirming condition (C-Confirm) within a predetermined confirming time period (ΔC) fulfillment of an abort condition (C-Abort) within a predetermined abort time period (ΔA) is determined, and wherein the confirming time period (ΔC), if utilized, and the abort time period (ΔA), if utilized, respectively fall within a predetermined non-restraining time period (ΔN-R) characterizing the reversible seat belt retractor arrangement, during which non-restraining time period (ΔN-R) no restraining force is applied b the reversible seat belt retractor arrangement by means of the seat belt to the vehicle occupant after generation of the activation signal (S-Activation). 15. A reversible seat belt retractor system of a vehicle for a vehicle occupant, the reversible seat belt retractor system comprising: a reversible seat belt retractor arrangement; and the retraction control system according to claim 14 configured to control retraction of a seat belt of the reversible seat belt retractor arrangement for the vehicle occupant. 16. A vehicle comprising: the reversible seat belt retractor system according to claim 15 ; a vehicle situation sensing system adapted to provide input to the reversible seat belt retractor system; and a vehicle seat for a vehicle occupant, at which vehicle seat the reversible seat belt retractor arrangement of the reversible seat belt retractor system is arranged.
Inflatable occupant restraints or confinements designed to inflate upon impact or impending impact, e.g. air bags ({protective garments with automatically inflatable shock-absorbing means A41D13/018; } connection of valves to inflatable elastic bodies B60C29/00) · CPC title
Roll-over · CPC title
Belt retractors, e.g. reels (anchoring devices {, e.g. guide loops} , with means to tension the belt in an emergency B60R22/195) · CPC title
Belt tensioners · CPC title
responsive to imminent contact with an obstacle {, e.g. using radar systems} · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.