Semi-rigid partially collapsible bottles

Patent metadata

Field	Value
Publication number	US-9456960-B2
Application number	US-200913140526-A
Country	US
Kind code	B2
Filing date	Dec 7, 2009
Priority date	Dec 19, 2008
Publication date	Oct 4, 2016
Grant date	Oct 4, 2016

Abstract

Partially collapsible bottles ( 10 ) for providing nutritional compositions and other fluids and methods of using the partially collapsible bottles are provided. In a general embodiment, the present disclosure provides a bottle ( 10 ) having a rigid wall ( 20 ), and a semi-rigid wall ( 30 ). The semi-rigid wall ( 30 ) is constructed and arranged to conform to an inner side of the rigid wall ( 20 ) in a collapsed form. The bottle ( 10 ) can be sized to hold any suitable volume such as, for example, from about 100 to 5000 mL.

First claim

The invention is claimed as follows:

1. A bottle comprising:
a rigid wall; and
a semi-rigid wall, the semi-rigid wall being so constructed and arranged to conform to an inner side of the rigid wall in a collapsed form, the rigid and semi-rigid walls having the same shape, and the semi-rigid wall being collapsible upon the application of a pressure of from about 15 mBar to about 80 mBar and comprises a surface area greater than a surface area of the rigid wall;
a neck formed from the rigid wall;
an air tight cap attached to the neck, the air tight cap including a passageway configured to be connected to a feeding assembly or tube, the neck and the air tight cap defining a longitudinal axis, and the semi-rigid wall so constructed and arranged to collapse along a direction substantially perpendicular to the longitudinal axis; and
a base, and the bottle has a volume ranging from about 100 to 5000 mL.

2. The bottle of claim 1 comprising a bottle for an enteral feed.

3. The bottle of claim 1 , wherein the semi-rigid wall is collapsible upon the application of a pressure of from about 40 mBar to about 60 mBar.

4. The bottle of claim 1 , wherein the semi-rigid wall is collapsible upon the application of a pressure of from about 45 mBar to about 55 mBar.

5. The bottle of claim 1 comprising a material selected from the group consisting of at least one active barrier material, at least one passive barrier material, and at least one active barrier material and at least one passive barrier material.

6. The bottle of claim 1 comprising a hanging mechanism.

7. The bottle of claim 1 , wherein the walls are made of at least one material selected from the group consisting of monolayer material, one multi-layer material, and a combination of monolayer and multilayer materials.

8. The bottle of claim 1 comprising an enteral feeding tube extending from the cap.

9. A method of supplying a nutritional composition to a patient for non-oral delivery, the method comprising:
filling a bottle with a nutritional composition, the bottle comprising a rigid wall and a semi-rigid wall, a neck formed from the rigid wall, an air tight cap attached to the neck, and a base, the air tight cap including a passageway configured to be connected to a feeding assembly or tube, the semi-rigid wall so constructed and arranged to conform to an inner side of the rigid wall in a collapsed form, the rigid and semi-rigid walls having the same shape, and the semi-rigid wall being collapsible upon the application of a pressure of from about 15 mBar to about 80 mBar and comprising a surface area greater than a surface area of the rigid wall, the neck and the air tight cap defining a longitudinal axis, and the semi-rigid wall so constructed and arranged to collapse along a direction substantially perpendicular to the longitudinal axis; and
enterally administering to the patient the nutritional composition through an enteral feeding tube extending from the bottle.

10. The method of claim 9 , wherein the patient is a mammal.

11. The method of claim 9 , wherein the patient is a human.

12. The method of claim 9 , wherein the semi-rigid wall collapses as the nutritional composition is administered.

13. A method of reducing healthcare costs, the method comprising:
administering an enteral feeding solution to a patient using a bottle comprising a rigid wall and a semi-rigid wall, a neck formed from the rigid wall, an air tight cap attached to the neck, and a base, the air tight cap including a passageway configured to be connected to a feeding assembly or tube, the semi-rigid wall so constructed and arranged to conform to an inner side of the rigid wall in a collapsed form, the rigid and semi-rigid walls having the same shape, and the semi-rigid wall being collapsible upon the application of a pressure of from about 15 mBar to about 80 mBar and comprising a surface area greater than a surface area of the rigid wall, the neck and the air tight cap defining a longitudinal axis, and the semi-rigid wall so constructed and arranged to collapse along a direction substantially perpendicular to the longitudinal axis, wherein using of the bottle reduces healthcare costs by decreasing contamination of the enteral feeding solution as compared with enteral feeding solutions that use another different bottle.

14. The method of claim 13 , wherein the reduction in healthcare cost is due to a decreased incidence of microbial infection.

15. The method of claim 13 , wherein the reduction in healthcare cost is due to a reduction of antibiotic used to treat a disorder selected from the group consisting of fungal infections (thrush), urinary tract infections, C. difficile associated diarrhea and combinations thereof.

16. The method of claim 15 , wherein the reduction in healthcare cost is due to a reduction of sequellae from antibiotic used to treat a disorder selected from the group consisting of fungal infections (thrush), urinary tract infections, C. difficile associated diarrhea, antibiotic resistant bacteria, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus , and combinations thereof.

17. The method of claim 13 , wherein the reduction in healthcare cost is due to increased hang time of the enteral solution.

18. The method of claim 13 , wherein the reduction in healthcare cost is due to a reduction in clogging of the enteral tubes.

19. The method of claim 13 , wherein the reduction in healthcare cost is due to a saving of nurse's time.

20. The method of claim 13 , wherein the reduction in healthcare cost is due to a reduction in number of alarms from the enteral feeding pump compared with when other bottles are used.

21. The method of claim 13 , wherein the reduction in healthcare cost is due to reducing environmental impact/waste costs the reduction being due to a lower carbon footprint as compared with other bottles due to less material used in the manufacture of the bottle compared to other bottles.

22. The method of claim 13 , wherein the reduction in healthcare cost is due to reducing environmental impact/waste costs the reduction being due to a lower carbon footprint as compared with other bottles due to less disposal volume compared to other bottles.

Assignees

• Ginzburg Jean-Daniel
• Lindberg Bjorn Joakim
• Teresi James Scott
• Rigardo Andrea
• Nestec Sa

Inventors

• Ginzburg Jean-Daniel
• Lindberg Bjorn Joakim
• Teresi James Scott
• Rigardo Andrea

Classifications

• A61J15/00

  Feeding-tubes for therapeutic purposes · CPC title

• A61J1/1487

  with friction fit, e.g. connecting tubes directly to a protruding port · CPC title

• A61J9/005 Primary

  Non-rigid or collapsible feeding-bottles · CPC title

• A61J1/1418

  Threaded type · CPC title

• A61J1/1475

  Inlet or outlet ports · CPC title