Multiprocessor Programming Toolkit for Design Reuse
US-2024394048-A1 · Nov 28, 2024 · US
US9454351B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9454351-B2 |
| Application number | US-201414196875-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Mar 4, 2014 |
| Priority date | Sep 26, 2011 |
| Publication date | Sep 27, 2016 |
| Grant date | Sep 27, 2016 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Examples of a continuous deployment system are provided that manage and track releases of software code, where some or all of the steps between check-in and deployment to production can be automated. Such systems can reduce the amount of developer effort needed to deploy a package, as developers may not have to be responsible for scheduling package builds, clicking deployment buttons, or manually running tests. The system can take care of all or some of that work.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A method for deploying software, the method comprising: under control of a continuous deployment system comprising computing hardware: receiving first source code modifications to a source code package; automatically building a first software package of the source code package having the first source code modifications, the first software package comprising executable program instructions; receiving second source code modifications to the source code package; automatically building a second software package of the source code package having the second source code modifications, the second software package comprising executable program instructions; selecting the first software package for promotion from a source stage to a destination stage, wherein the first software package and the second software package are included on the source stage and approved for promotion to the destination stage, and wherein the first software package is compatible with a third software package included on the destination stage; automatically initiating one or more software tests against the first software package to determine whether to deploy the first software package, wherein automatically initiating one or more software tests comprises locking a testing environment on which the first software package operating to prevent additional deployments to the testing environment during testing; approving the first software package for promotion to a deployment environment when the one or more software tests are passed by the first software package, wherein the deployment environment comprises computer hardware and wherein the first software package is promoted through a plurality of stages prior to the promotion to the deployment environment; and in response to approving the first software package, causing the first software package to be deployed to the deployment environment. 2. The method of claim 1 , wherein causing the first software package to be deployed comprises: determining a time window operative on the first software package; and deploying the first software package during a time when the time window is open. 3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising automatically rolling back to a previously deployed version of the first software package when the one or more software tests are failed by the first software package. 4. The method of claim 1 , the method further comprising: approving the second software package for promotion to the deployment environment when the one or more software tests are passed by the second software package, where in the second software package is promoted through the plurality of stages prior to the promotion to the deployment environment. 5. The method of claim 4 , wherein the first software package and the second software package are built into a first application and a second application. 6. The method of claim 4 , further comprising approving the first software package and the second software package for promotion in response to receiving from an input device an indication of a manual approval from a user. 7. The method of claim 6 , wherein a user-selectable approve feature is presented on a presentation device associated with the continuous deployment system. 8. The method of claim 4 , further comprising approving the second software package for promotion by automatically determining that the second software packages is associated with a later revision number than the first software package. 9. The method of claim 4 , further comprising approving the second software package for promotion by automatically determining the second software packages has passed more software tests included in the one or more software tests than the first software package. 10. The method of claim 1 , further comprising determining compatibility between the first software package and the third software package based at least partly on a revision number associated with the first software package and a revision number associated with the third software package. 11. A system for deploying software, the system comprising: a computer interface configured to receive first source code modifications and second source code modifications for a source code package; and a software deployment manager comprising computer hardware processor, the deployment manager configured to: automatically build a first software package of the source code package having the first source code modifications and a second software package of the source code package having the second source code modifications; select the first software package for promotion from a source stage to a destination stage, wherein the first software package and the second software package are included on the source stage and approved for promotion to the destination stage, and wherein the first software package is compatible with a third software package included on the destination stage; automatically initiate one or more software tests against the first software package to determine whether to promote a modified software package, wherein to automatically initiate the one or more software tests the deployment manager is configured to lock a testing environment on which the first software package is operating to prevent additional deployments to the testing environment during testing; approve the first software package for promotion to a deployment environment when the one or more software tests are passed by the first software package, wherein the first software package is promoted through a plurality of stages prior to the promotion to the deployment environment; and cause the first software package to be deployed to the deployment environment. 12. The system of claim 11 , wherein the deployment manager is further configured to: approve the second software package for promotion to the deployment environment when the one or more software tests are passed by the second software package, where in the second software package is promoted through the plurality of stages prior to the promotion to the deployment environment. 13. The system of claim 11 , wherein the system further comprises storage nodes configured to store source code related data, the source code related data comprises one or more of code changes, code versions, versioning data, change history, code backups, code metadata, developer identifications, and continuous deployment system events. 14. The system of claim 11 , wherein the computer interface comprises a pipeline interface configured to report progress of deployment of the software. 15. The system of claim 14 , wherein the pipeline interface is further configured to rollback to a previously deployed version of the first software package when the one or more software tests are failed by the first software package. 16. The system of claim 11 , wherein the deployment environment is determined based at least partly on promotion configurations provided by a user. 17. The system of claim 11 , wherein the deployment manager is further configured to determine compatibility between the first software package and the third software package based at least partly on associated revision numbers. 18. The system of claim 11 , wherein each of the plurality of stages is involved with at least one software test that is different from software tests in other stages. 19. Non-transitory computer storage having stored thereon instructions that, when executed by a computer system, cause the computer system to: in response to receipt of first source code modifications to
Configuring for operating with peripheral devices; Loading of device drivers · CPC title
Plug-ins; Add-ons · CPC title
Version control (security arrangements therefor G06F21/57); Configuration management · CPC title
Testing of software · CPC title
Software deployment · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.