Football sensing
US-10821329-B2 · Nov 3, 2020 · US
US9452322B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9452322-B2 |
| Application number | US-201313827067-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Jun 11, 2013 |
| Priority date | Aug 2, 2006 |
| Publication date | Sep 27, 2016 |
| Grant date | Sep 27, 2016 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A football having a prolate spheroidal shape including longitudinally spaced apart first and second ends. The football is capable of being analyzed under computational fluid dynamics analysis, and includes upper and lower central regions. Each positioned between first and second upper and lower end regions, respectively. The football further includes a bladder, a cover, a plurality of boundary layer trip mechanisms coupled to the upper and/or lower central regions, and a lacing coupled to the upper central region. The analysis includes first and second configurations. The first configuration is conducted on the football with the trip mechanisms, and the second configuration is conducted on the football without the trip mechanisms. The first and second configurations provide first and second drag coefficients, respectively. The first coefficient is at least 3 percent lower than the second coefficient. The length of the upper and lower central regions is defined by the lacing.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A football having a generally prolate spheroidal shape including a major dimension about a longitudinal axis, and longitudinally spaced apart first and second ends, the football capable of being analyzed under computational fluid dynamics analysis conducted at a Reynolds Number of approximately 270,000 having input parameters of a thrown speed of 60 mph, a rifle spin of 10 revolutions per second and a 0 degree angle of attack to airflow, the football comprising: a bladder; a cover positioned over the bladder and including at least four cover panels, the football including an upper central region positioned between first and second upper end regions, and a lower central region positioned between first and second lower end regions, at least four longitudinally extending seams being formed between the four cover panels, the cover including a plurality of boundary layer trip mechanisms coupled to at least one of the upper and lower central regions, the plurality of trip mechanisms being spaced apart from the longitudinally extending seams, the computational fluid dynamics analysis including first and second analysis configurations, the first analysis configuration conducted on the football with the plurality of boundary layer trip mechanisms, and the second analysis configuration conducted on the football wherein the plurality of boundary layer trip mechanisms are removed, the first and second analysis configurations provide first and second airflow separation lengths, respectively, the first and second airflow separation lengths being measured from the leading one of the first and second ends to first and second airflow separation planes, respectively, each of the first and second airflow separation planes orthogonally extending with respect to the longitudinal dimension, the first and second separation planes positioned at the locations where the airflow in the computational fluid dynamics begins to separate from an outer surface of the cover, the first airflow separation length being at least 2 percent greater than the second airflow separation length; and a lacing coupled to the upper central region of the football, the length of the upper and lower central regions being defined by the length of the lacing with respect to the longitudinal axis. 2. The football of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of trip mechanism are arranged such that a central football plane extends through the trip mechanisms, and wherein the central football plane is positioned orthogonal to the longitudinal axis and divides the football into two halves of substantially equal length. 3. The football of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of trip mechanisms are symmetrically spaced apart from a central football plane, and wherein the central football is positioned orthogonal to the longitudinal axis and divides the football into two halves of substantially equal length. 4. The football of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of trip mechanism are arranged such that a central football plane extends through at least one of the trip mechanisms, wherein at least two of the plurality of trip mechanisms are symmetrically spaced apart from the central football plane, and wherein the central football is positioned orthogonal to the longitudinal axis and divides the football into two halves of substantially equal length. 5. The football of claim 1 , wherein the shape of the plurality of trip mechanisms with respect to the outer surface of the cover is selected from the group consisting of circular, semi-circular, hemi-spherical, semi-hemispherical, concave, convex, ovular, elliptical, triangular, rectangular, diamond-like, other polygonal shapes, C-shaped, U-shaped, S-shaped, chevron shaped, other curved shapes, and combinations thereof. 6. The football of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of trip mechanisms are spaced apart from the lacing. 7. The football of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of trip mechanisms are a plurality of projections, and wherein at least two of the projections have a height with respect to the outer surface of the cover within the range of 0.6 to 10.0 mm. 8. The football of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of trip mechanisms are defined by the cover, and wherein at least two of the trip mechanisms are depressions in the outer surface of the cover having a depth within the range of 0.6 to 10.0 mm. 9. The football of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of trip mechanisms are a plurality of inserts defining depressions, and wherein at least two of the depressions have a depth with respect to the outer surface of the cover within the range of 0.6 to 10.0 mm. 10. The football of claim 1 , wherein the outer surface of the cover includes a pebbled texture including a plurality of pebble-like projections, and wherein the pebble-like projections have a height within the range of 0.05 mm to 0.6 mm. 11. The football of claim 1 , further comprising at least two strips coupled to first and second upper end regions of the cover. 12. A football having a generally prolate spheroidal shape including a major dimension about a longitudinal axis, and longitudinally spaced apart first and second ends, the football capable of being analyzed under computational fluid dynamics analysis conducted at a Reynolds Number of approximately 270,000 having input parameters of a thrown speed of 60 mph, a rifle spin of 10 revolutions per second and a 0 degree angle of attack to airflow, the football comprising: a bladder; a cover positioned over the bladder and including at least four cover panels, the football including an upper central region positioned between first and second upper end regions, and a lower central region positioned between first and second lower end regions, at least four longitudinally extending seams being formed between the four cover panels, the cover including a plurality of boundary layer trip mechanisms coupled to at least one of the upper and lower central regions, the plurality of trip mechanisms being spaced apart from the longitudinally extending seams, the computational fluid dynamics analysis including first and second analysis configurations, the first analysis configuration conducted on the football with the plurality of boundary layer trip mechanisms, and the second analysis configuration conducted on the football wherein the plurality of boundary layer trip mechanisms are removed, the first and second analysis configurations providing first and second drag coefficients, respectively, the first drag coefficient being at least 3 percent lower than the second drag coefficient; and a lacing coupled to the upper central region of the football, the length of the upper and lower central regions being defined by the length of the lacing with respect to the longitudinal axis. 13. The football of claim 12 , wherein the first and second analysis configurations provide first and second airflow separation lengths, wherein the first and second airflow separation lengths are measured from the leading one of the first and second ends to first and second airflow separation planes, respectively, wherein each of the first and second airflow separation planes orthogonally extending with respect to the longitudinal dimension, wherein the first and second separation planes are positioned at the locations where the airflow in the computational fluid dynamics begins to separate from an outer surface of the cover, and wherein the first airflow separation length is at least 2 percent greater than the second airflow separation length. 14. The football of claim 12 , wherein the plurality of trip mechanism are arranged such that a central football plane extends through the trip mechanisms
Hollow inflatable balls · CPC title
Ball covers; Closures therefor · CPC title
with special configuration, e.g. non-spherical (discs for throwing A63B65/10) · CPC title
American football · CPC title
Special aerodynamic features, e.g. airfoil shapes, wings or air passages · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.