Parallel feeders for continued operation
US-2024310424-A1 · Sep 19, 2024 · US
US9442152B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9442152-B2 |
| Application number | US-201414458350-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Aug 13, 2014 |
| Priority date | Aug 15, 2013 |
| Publication date | Sep 13, 2016 |
| Grant date | Sep 13, 2016 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A fault location system for a distribution network is disclosed. The fault location system includes at least one sensor and a fault location evaluation apparatus. The at least one sensor is located on the distribution network, for sensing current and dividing the distribution network into at least two regions. The fault location evaluation apparatus includes a fault region determination unit for determining which one of the at least two regions is a fault region where a fault occurs therein by calculating the sensed current from the at least one sensor.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A fault location system for a distribution network, the fault location system comprising: at least one sensor located on the distribution network, for sensing current and voltage; and a fault location evaluation apparatus comprising: a possible power flow path (PPFP) selecting unit for selecting PPFPs one by one in the distribution network; a line section selecting unit for selecting line sections one by one in each of the selected PPFPs; a line section classification unit for classifying each of the selected line sections into a corresponding equivalent fault model based on the selected PPFP; a fault location parameter calculation unit for calculating a fault distance ‘D’ and a fault resistance ‘R F ’ of an assumed fault point of each of the selected line sections based on the corresponding equivalent fault model; a fault location candidate record unit for recording the assumed fault points as fault location candidates if R F ≧0 and 0≦D≦D T , wherein ‘DT’ is the total length of the corresponding line section. 2. The fault location system of claim 1 wherein the fault distance ‘D’ is an average value of at least two calculated fault distances ‘D’ if the corresponding line section belongs to at least two PPFPs. 3. The fault location system of claim 1 , wherein the equivalent fault model comprises at least one sensor point, a fault point, a fault resistance, and line impedances corresponding to different line sections. 4. The fault location system of claim 3 , wherein the fault distance ‘D’ and the fault resistance ‘R F ’ are calculated based on an Ohm's law equation, the sensed current and voltage from the at least one sensor, and predetermined parameters in the corresponding equivalent fault model. 5. The fault location system of claim 1 , wherein the at least one sensor evenly divides the distribution network into the at least two regions. 6. A fault location method for a distribution network, the fault location method comprising: sensing current and voltage on at least one position of the distribution network using at least one sensor; selecting possible current power flow paths (PPFPs) one by one in the distribution network; selecting line selections one by one in each of the selected PPFPs; classifying each of the selected line sections into a corresponding equivalent fault model based on the selected PPFP; calculating a fault distance ‘D’ and a fault resistance ‘R F ’ of an assumed fault point of each of the selected line sections based on the corresponding equivalent fault model; and recording the assumed fault points as fault location candidates if fault location candidates if R F ≧0 and 0≦D≦D T , wherein ‘D T ’ is the total length of the corresponding line section. 7. The fault location method of claim 6 , wherein the fault distance ‘D’ is an average value of at least two calculated fault distances ‘D’ if the corresponding line section belongs to at least two PPFPs. 8. The fault location method of claim 6 , wherein the equivalent fault model comprises at least one sensor point, a fault point, a fault resistance, and line impedances corresponding to different line sections. 9. The fault location method of claim 8 , wherein the fault distance ‘D’ and the fault resistance ‘RF’ are calculated based on an Ohm's law equation, the sensed current and voltage, and predetermined parameters in the corresponding equivalent fault model. 10. The fault location method of claim 6 , wherein the at least one position evenly divides the distribution network into the at least two regions.
in power transmission or distribution networks, i.e. with interconnected conductors · CPC title
Cross-Sectional Technologies · mapped topic
Outage or fault management, e.g. fault detection or location · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.