Equidistant-temporal aggregation for moving object segmentation
US-2024425042-A1 · Dec 26, 2024 · US
US9430847B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9430847-B2 |
| Application number | US-201414302623-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Jun 12, 2014 |
| Priority date | Jun 12, 2014 |
| Publication date | Aug 30, 2016 |
| Grant date | Aug 30, 2016 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A method determines a motion between a first and second coordinate system, by first extracting a first set of primitives from a 3D image acquired in the first coordinate system from an environment, and extracting a second set of primitives from a 3D image acquired in the second coordinate system from the environment. Motion hypotheses are generated for different combinations of the first and second sets of primitives using a RANdom SAmple Consensus procedure. Each motion hypothesis is scored using a scoring function learned using parameter learning techniques. Then, a best motion hypothesis is selected as the motion between the first and second coordinate system.
Opening claim text (preview).
We claim: 1. A method for determining a motion between a first and second coordinate system, comprising the steps of: extracting a first set of primitives from a 3D image acquired in the first coordinate system from an environment; extracting a second set of primitives from a 3D image acquired in the second coordinate system from the environment; generating motion hypotheses for the first and second sets of primitives using a RANdom SAmple Consensus procedure; determining a score for each motion hypothesis using a scoring function learned using parameter learning techniques, wherein parameters of the scoring function are determined using training data in a structured learning procedure; and selecting, based on the score, a best motion hypothesis as the motion between the first and second coordinate system. 2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the set of primitives corresponds to points, lines and planes. 3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the points and lines are in two dimensional or three dimensional space, and the planes are in three dimensional space. 4. The method of claim 1 , wherein a subset of the primitives selected in the first coordinate system is same as the subset of the primitives selected in the second coordinate system. 5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the subset of the primitives selected in the first coordinate system is different from the subset of primitives selected in the second coordinate system. 6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the motion hypotheses are generated using combinations of the primitives as shown in Table 1. 7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the motion hypotheses are generated using 3 points in 2D space and 1 point in 3D space from the first coordinate system, and 3 points in 2D space and 1 point in 3D space from the second coordinate system. 8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the motion hypotheses are generated using 1 point in 2D space and 2 points in 3D space from the first coordinate system, and 1 point in 2D space and 2 points in 3D space from the second coordinate system. 9. The method of claim 1 , wherein a ground truth motion for the training data is obtained using a global positioning system. 10. The method of claim 1 , wherein a ground truth motion for the training data is obtained using inertial measurement units. 11. The method of claim 1 , wherein the parameters learned using the structured learning procedure are different for points, lines and planes. 12. The method of claim 1 , wherein the parameters learned using the structured learning procedure are different for different locations of the image. 13. The method of claim 1 , wherein the parameters are learned for the motion. 14. The method of claim 1 , wherein the 3D image is obtained using a stereo or trinocular stereo camera. 15. The method of claim 1 , wherein the 3D image is obtained using a red, green, blue and depth sensor.
using feature-based methods, e.g. the tracking of corners or segments · CPC title
Analysis of motion (motion estimation for coding, decoding, compressing or decompressing digital video signals H04N19/43, H04N19/51) · CPC title
Generating training patterns; Bootstrap methods, e.g. bagging or boosting · CPC title
Physics · mapped topic
Physics · mapped topic
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.