Active featuring in computer-human interactive learning

US9430460B2 · US · B2

Patent metadata
FieldValue
Publication numberUS-9430460-B2
Application numberUS-201314075708-A
CountryUS
Kind codeB2
Filing dateNov 8, 2013
Priority dateJul 12, 2013
Publication dateAug 30, 2016
Grant dateAug 30, 2016

How to read this patent

A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.

  1. Title

    What the patent document calls the invention.

  2. Abstract

    A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.

  3. Assignees and inventors

    Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.

  4. Key dates

    Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.

  5. First independent claim

    The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.

  6. CPC / IPC classifications

    Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.

  7. Citations and related patents

    Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.

Abstract

Official abstract text for this publication.

A collection of data that is extremely large can be difficult to search and/or analyze. Relevance may be dramatically improved by automatically classifying queries and web pages in useful categories, and using these classification scores as relevance features. A thorough approach may require building a large number of classifiers, corresponding to the various types of information, activities, and products. Creation of classifiers and schematizers is provided on large data sets. Exercising the classifiers and schematizers on hundreds of millions of items may expose value that is inherent to the data by adding usable meta-data. Some aspects include active labeling exploration, automatic regularization and cold start, scaling with the number of items and the number of classifiers, active featuring, and segmentation and schematization.

First claim

Opening claim text (preview).

The invention claimed is: 1. A system for facilitating interactive feature selection for machine learning, the method comprising: one or more memory devices; and one or more processors configured to: provide a first training set of data items, wherein one or more of the data items have been previously labeled with example labels of a particular class of data item; provide a classifier to be trained to determine labels for data items; utilize the classifier to determine predicted labels for one or more of the data items that have been previously labeled with example labels; identify one or more data items from the first training set having a discrepancy between a respective example label and a predicted label that was determined by the classifier; present via a user interface an indication of the one or more data items from the first training set having the discrepancy between the respective example label and the predicted label, wherein the user interface includes a feature-selection interface configured to receive a user selection of one or more features that are utilized as input features to train the classifier and improve the accuracy of the predicted labels; receive, via the user interface, the user selection of one or more features; and train the classifier with the one or more user-selected features as input features; wherein the one or more processors are further configured to iteratively repeat the steps of utilize, identify, present, receive, and train, with the first training set until a user input is received which indicates that feature selection is complete. 2. The system of claim 1 , the one or more processors further configured to: store user-selectable features; and present to the user an option to select one or more of the user-selectable features; wherein the one or more user-selected features include one or more features selected from among the user-selectable features. 3. The system of claim 2 , wherein the user-selectable features include one or more of a built-in feature, a user-generated feature, a trained classifier, a trained segment extractor, or a dictionary. 4. The system of claim 2 , wherein the user-selectable features include features generated by a plurality of users. 5. The system of claim 4 , wherein the user-selectable features are stored on a commonly accessible system shared by multiple users. 6. The system of claim 1 , the one or more processors further configured to: upon receiving the user input that indicates the feature selection is complete, designate the classifier as a feature that is usable as an input feature to train classifiers or schematizers, wherein the classifier is frozen such that the classifier is not allowed to be retrained. 7. One or more hardware computer-readable media having embodied thereon computer-usable instructions that, when executed, facilitate a method of interactive feature selection for machine learning, the method comprising: providing a first set of data items, wherein one or more of the data items include tokens that have been previously labeled as portions of a particular schema; for the one or more data items, utilizing a schematizer to determine predicted labels for one or more of the tokens that have been previously labeled; identifying one or more tokens having a discrepancy between a previous label and a predicted label; presenting via a user interface an indication of the one or more tokens having the discrepancy between the previous label and the predicted label, wherein the user interface includes a feature-selection interface configured to receive a user selection of one or more features that are usable as input features to train the schematizer; receiving, via the user interface, the user selection of one or more features; and training the schematizer with the one or more user-selected features as input features. 8. The media of claim 7 , the method further comprising: storing user-selectable features; and presenting to the user an option to select one or more of the user-selectable features; wherein the one or more user-selected features include one or more features selected from among the user-selectable features. 9. The media of claim 8 , wherein the user-selectable features include one or more of a built-in feature, a user-generated feature, a trained classifier, a trained segment extractor, or a dictionary. 10. The media of claim 8 , wherein the user-selectable features include features generated by a plurality of users. 11. The media of claim 10 , wherein the user-selectable features are stored on a commonly accessible system shared by multiple users. 12. The media of claim 7 , the method further comprising repeating the scoring, identifying, presenting, receiving, and training. 13. The media of claim 12 , the method further comprising: upon receiving a user input that indicates the feature selection is complete, designating the schematizer as a feature that is usable as an input feature to train classifiers or schematizers, wherein the schematizer is frozen such that the schematizer is not allowed to be retrained. 14. A method of interactive feature selection for machine learning, comprising: providing a first set of data items, wherein one or more of the data items have been previously labeled as examples of a particular class of data item; utilizing a classifier to determine predicted labels for one or more of the data items; identifying one or more data items having a discrepancy between a previous label and a predicted label; presenting via a user interface an indication of the one or more data items having the discrepancy between the previous label and the predicted label, wherein the user interface includes a feature-selection interface configured to receive a user selection of one or more features that are usable as input features to train the classifier; receiving a search query via the search interface; executing the search query on the first set of data items, wherein search results are generated; presenting the search results to the user; receiving a user input that selects the search query as a first feature for training the classifier; receiving, via the user interface, a user input that selects a dictionary as a second feature for training the classifier, wherein the dictionary includes words that define a concept that corresponds to the second feature; training the classifier with the search query and the dictionary as input features; utilizing the classifier to determine new predicted labels for one or more of the data items; identifying one or more data items having a discrepancy between a previous label and a new predicted label; presenting via the user interface an indication of the one or more data items having the discrepancy between the previous label and the new predicted label; receiving, via the user interface, a user selection of one or more features; and training the classifier with the one or more user-selected features as input features. 15. The method of claim 14 , wherein the dictionary is designated from among one or more dictionaries generated by the user. 16. The method of claim 14 , wherein the interface includes an interface for selecting a dictionary from among a group of dictionaries generated by a plurality of users. 17. The method of claim 15 , the method further comprising: receiving a user input that designates a second dictionary generated by another user; and utilizing the second dictionary as an input feature to train the classifier. 18. The method of claim 14 ,

Assignees

Inventors

Classifications

  • Probabilistic graphical models, e.g. probabilistic networks · CPC title

  • G06F40/242Primary

    Dictionaries · CPC title

  • G06N20/00Primary

    Machine learning · CPC title

  • Formats for control data (H04L1/16 takes precedence; training sequences H04L25/00 and H04L27/00) · CPC title

  • Indexing; Web crawling techniques · CPC title

Patent family

Related publications grouped by family.

External sources

Frequently asked questions

Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.

What does patent US9430460B2 cover?
A collection of data that is extremely large can be difficult to search and/or analyze. Relevance may be dramatically improved by automatically classifying queries and web pages in useful categories, and using these classification scores as relevance features. A thorough approach may require building a large number of classifiers, corresponding to the various types of information, activities, a…
Who is the assignee on this patent?
Microsoft Technology Licensing Llc
What technology area does this patent fall under?
Primary CPC classification G06F40/242. Mapped technology areas include Physics.
When was this patent published?
Publication date Tue Aug 30 2016 00:00:00 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) (B2). Legal status and post-grant events are not shown on this page.
What related patents are in patentsdb?
We list 8 related publications on this page (citations in our corpus or others sharing the same primary CPC).