Systems and methods for intelligent phishing threat detection and phishing threat remediation in a cyber security threat detection and mitigation platform
US-2024414198-A1 · Dec 12, 2024 · US
US9424423B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9424423-B2 |
| Application number | US-201213611201-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Sep 12, 2012 |
| Priority date | Sep 12, 2012 |
| Publication date | Aug 23, 2016 |
| Grant date | Aug 23, 2016 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Methods for creating a hybrid string representations include receiving string information as input; parsing the string information to produce one or more string components; determining string components that may be represented concretely by comparing the one or more components to a set of known concretizations; abstracting all string components that could not be represented concretely; and creating a hybrid string representation that includes at least one concrete string component and at least one abstracted string component.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A method for creating a hybrid string representation, comprising: receiving string information as input; parsing the string information to produce one or more string components using a processor; determining string components that may be represented concretely by comparing the one or more components to a set of known concretizations, wherein the set of known concretizations includes string configurations that cannot be interfered with by an attacker; abstracting all string components that could not be represented concretely; and creating a hybrid string representation that includes at least one concrete string component and at least one abstracted string component. 2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the set of known concretizations includes strings that refer to a page's uniform resource location. 3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the set of known concretizations includes strings that include the JavaScript® object “document.location”. 4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising binding between an external configuration file and string variables to automatically concretize a string component. 5. The method of claim 4 , wherein said binding comprises monitoring framework interfaces used to retrieve string values from the configuration files. 6. The method of claim 1 , wherein abstracting string components comprises replacing a string component with one or more regular expressions. 7. The method of claim 1 , wherein creating a hybrid string representation comprises concatenating said at least one concrete string component and said at least one abstracted string component. 8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the string information comprises a combination of program code and markup code. 9. A method for static analysis, comprising: receiving string information comprising program code as input; parsing the string information to produce one or more string components using a processor; determining string components that may be represented concretely by comparing the one or more components to a set of known concretizations, wherein the set of known concretizations includes string configurations that cannot be interfered with by an attacker; abstracting all string components that could not be represented concretely; creating a hybrid string representation that includes at least one concrete string component and at least one abstracted string component; and performing a taint analysis on the hybrid string representation to locate potential vulnerabilities. 10. The method of claim 9 , wherein the set of known concretizations includes strings that refer to a page's uniform resource location. 11. The method of claim 10 , wherein the set of known concretizations includes strings that include the JavaScript® object “document.location”. 12. The method of claim 9 , further comprising binding between an external configuration file and string variables to automatically concretize a string component. 13. The method of claim 12 , wherein said binding comprises monitoring framework interfaces used to retrieve string values from the configuration files. 14. The method of claim 9 , wherein abstracting string components comprises replacing a string component with one or more regular expressions. 15. The method of claim 9 , wherein creating a hybrid string representation comprises concatenating said at least one concrete string component and said at least one abstracted string component. 16. The method of claim 9 , wherein the string information comprises a combination of program code and markup code. 17. A non-transitory computer readable storage medium comprising a computer readable program for creating a hybrid string representation, wherein the computer readable program when executed on a computer causes the computer to perform the steps of: receiving string information as input; parsing the string information to produce one or more string components using a processor; determining string components that may be represented concretely by comparing the one or more components to a set of known concretizations, wherein the set of known concretizations includes string configurations that cannot be interfered with by an attacker; abstracting all string components that could not be represented concretely; creating a hybrid string representation that includes at least one concrete string component and at least one abstracted string component. 18. A non-transitory computer readable storage medium comprising a computer readable program for static analysis, wherein the computer readable program when executed on a computer causes the computer to perform the steps of: receiving string information comprising program code as input; parsing the string information to produce one or more string components using a processor; determining string components that may be represented concretely by comparing the one or more components to a set of known concretizations, wherein the set of known concretizations includes string configurations that cannot be interfered with by an attacker; abstracting all string components that could not be represented concretely; creating a hybrid string representation that includes at least one concrete string component and at least one abstracted string component; performing a taint analysis on the hybrid string representation to locate potential vulnerabilities.
by monitoring network traffic (monitoring network traffic per se H04L43/00) · CPC title
Formatting, i.e. changing of presentation of documents (automatic justification G06F40/189; automatic line break hyphenation G06F40/191) · CPC title
Calculation of difference between files · CPC title
by source code analysis · CPC title
Parsing markup language streams (streaming G06F40/149) · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.