Method for improving the driving stability

US9409554B2 · US · B2

Patent metadata
FieldValue
Publication numberUS-9409554-B2
Application numberUS-201214232672-A
CountryUS
Kind codeB2
Filing dateJul 18, 2012
Priority dateJul 19, 2011
Publication dateAug 9, 2016
Grant dateAug 9, 2016

How to read this patent

A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.

  1. Title

    What the patent document calls the invention.

  2. Abstract

    A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.

  3. Assignees and inventors

    Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.

  4. Key dates

    Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.

  5. First independent claim

    The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.

  6. CPC / IPC classifications

    Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.

  7. Citations and related patents

    Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.

Abstract

Official abstract text for this publication.

The invention relates to a method for improving the driving stability of a motor vehicle in which driver-independent braking interventions are triggered if a critical driving situation is to be expected on the basis of route information and instantaneous position data of the motor vehicle, and to a corresponding system. According to the invention, the driver predefines, via a human/machine interface, information about the maximum coefficient of friction to be utilized, which is used as the basis for the prediction of a critical driving situation.

First claim

Opening claim text (preview).

The invention claimed is: 1. A method for improving the driving stability of a motor vehicle comprising: enabling a driver to predefine, via a human/machine interface, information about a maximum coefficient of friction; determining an expected coefficient of friction on the basis of route information and instantaneous position data of the motor vehicle; comparing the expected coefficient of friction with the maximum coefficient of friction predetermined by the driver; predicting whether a critical driving situation is to be expected on the basis of a result of the comparison of the expected coefficient of friction with the maximum coefficient of friction predetermined by the driver; and triggering a driver-independent braking intervention if the critical driving situation is to be expected. 2. The method as claimed in claim 1 , further comprising determining a coefficient of friction which is required for safely driving along a predetermined route for a predefined distance on the basis of one or more instantaneous driving state variables, including instantaneous velocity, the route information and the instantaneous position data of the motor vehicle, taking into account a minimum bend radius which occurs in the predefined distance and the instantaneous velocity, wherein the predefined distance over which the coefficient of friction which is required for safely driving along the predetermined route is selected as a function of the instantaneous velocity. 3. The method as claimed in claim 2 , further comprising informing the driver about the coefficient of friction which is required to safely drive along the predetermined route, in particular by a visual display, which additionally makes available information about a weather situation in which a corresponding coefficient of friction is to be expected. 4. The method as claimed in claim 2 , further comprising determining a limiting speed for safely driving along the predetermined route for the predefined distance on the basis of the information relating to the maximum coefficient of friction to be utilized, the route information and the instantaneous position data of the motor vehicle, taking into account the minimum bend radius occurring in the predefined distance, wherein the predefined distance over which the coefficient of friction which is required to safely drive along the predetermined route is determined is selected as a function of the instantaneous velocity. 5. The method as claimed in claim 4 , further comprising adding the instantaneous velocity to the limiting speed such that at least one of braking interventions take place at two or more wheels of the motor vehicle and the drive torque is reduced. 6. The method as claimed in claim 5 , further comprising selecting the applied braking forces as a function of at least one of the difference between the instantaneous velocity and the limiting speed and the distance from the point on the route with the minimum bend radius. 7. The method as claimed in claim 5 , further comprising limiting at least one of the applied braking forces and the change in the drive torque with respect to the accelerator position, in such a way that the longitudinal deceleration of the vehicle does not exceed a predetermined deceleration threshold value. 8. The method as claimed in claim 1 , further comprising informing the driver at least one of haptically and visually, by an accelerator pedal having active restoring forces, if a reduction in the velocity should take place in order to avoid critical driving situations, in order to ensure reliable driving along the predetermined route. 9. The method as claimed in claim 1 , further comprising modifying the information which is predefined by the driver and which relates to the maximum coefficient of friction to be utilized on the basis of one or more further independent variables such as at least one of data of a rain sensor and current weather information, and checking the plausibility of said information, wherein, a minimum is formed between two independent values. 10. The method as claimed in claim 1 , further comprising triggering a braking intervention when the presence of a bend has been confirmed by at least one of a steering movement of the driver, the setting of a flashing indicator light, and information of a surroundings sensor system, comprising one or more cameras. 11. The method as claimed in claim 1 , further comprising at least one of controlling the distance from a vehicle traveling ahead and triggering an emergency braking operation when obstacles are detected on the roadway, wherein the controlling or the triggering is performed by an electronic control unit which is connected to the surroundings sensor system, and the setpoint value of the distance controlling device or the minimum distance, the undershooting of which triggers emergency braking, are/is selected or modified as a function of the information which is predefined by the driver and relates to the maximum coefficient of friction to be utilized. 12. A system for regulating the driving stability of a motor vehicle, having an electronic control device configured to control the driver-independent building up of braking forces at one or more wheels of the motor vehicle, one or more sensors for sensing information about the instantaneous driving state, including at least one of a yaw rate sensor, a steering angle sensor, a lateral acceleration sensor, and wheel rotational speed sensors, a GPS receiver for determining the current vehicle position, and a navigation system with digital map data for making available route information, wherein a human/machine interface for inputting information on the maximum coefficient of friction to be utilized, in particular a switch and wherein the electronic control device carries out a method as claimed in claim 1 . 13. The system as claimed in claim 12 , wherein the control device is further configured to at least one of haptically and visually inform the driver about the critical situation to be expected, including an accelerator pedal having active restoring forces, and estimate a coefficient of friction which is required to safely drive along a predefined route. 14. The system as claimed in claim 12 , wherein the control device is further configured to regulate at least one of the distance from vehicles traveling ahead and the vehicle speed, wherein the control device is connected to a surroundings sensor system including one or more cameras. 15. The system as claimed in claim 12 , further comprising at least one of active shock absorbers, active roll stabilizers, a superimposition steering system at the front axle, and a rear-axle steering system. 16. Use of a system according to at least claim 12 , in a motor vehicle which is at least temporarily driven by one or more electric motors.

Assignees

Inventors

Classifications

  • including means for detecting potential obstacles in vehicle path · CPC title

  • Friction · CPC title

  • B60T8/1755Primary

    Brake regulation specially adapted to control the stability of the vehicle, e.g. taking into account yaw rate or transverse acceleration in a curve (road vehicle drive control systems for control of driving stability otherwise than by controlling a particular sub-unit B60W30/02) · CPC title

  • B60T7/12Primary

    for automatic initiation; for initiation not subject to will of driver or passenger {(limiting speed of vehicles other than rail vehicles B60K31/00)} · CPC title

  • Curve braking control, e.g. turn control within ABS control algorithm · CPC title

Patent family

Related publications grouped by family.

External sources

Frequently asked questions

Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.

What does patent US9409554B2 cover?
The invention relates to a method for improving the driving stability of a motor vehicle in which driver-independent braking interventions are triggered if a critical driving situation is to be expected on the basis of route information and instantaneous position data of the motor vehicle, and to a corresponding system. According to the invention, the driver predefines, via a human/machine inte…
Who is the assignee on this patent?
Raste Thomas, Lauer Peter, Rieth Peter E, and 1 more
What technology area does this patent fall under?
Primary CPC classification B60T8/1755. Mapped technology areas include Operations & Transport.
When was this patent published?
Publication date Tue Aug 09 2016 00:00:00 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) (B2). Legal status and post-grant events are not shown on this page.
What related patents are in patentsdb?
We list 8 related publications on this page (citations in our corpus or others sharing the same primary CPC).