Resolving merged touch contacts
US-9122341-B2 · Sep 1, 2015 · US
US9395845B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9395845-B2 |
| Application number | US-201514662512-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Mar 19, 2015 |
| Priority date | Jan 24, 2011 |
| Publication date | Jul 19, 2016 |
| Grant date | Jul 19, 2016 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Touchscreen testing techniques are described. In one or more implementations, a piece of conductor (e.g., metal) is positioned as proximal to a touchscreen device and the touchscreen device is tested by simulating a touch of a user. This technique may be utilized to perform a variety of different testing of a touchscreen device, such as to test latency and probabilistic latency. Additional techniques are also described including contact geometry testing techniques.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A method comprising: displaying a moving item by a touchscreen device; receiving data that describes one or more touch inputs that are to follow the display of the moving item; and calculating end-to-end latency of the computing device based on the data corresponding to the one or more touch inputs and data describing the display of the moving item by at least computing a distance between a position at which the item is displayed and a position at which the touch input is received at a particular point in time, wherein the calculating involves the following expression to model the end-to-end latency: end-to-end latency=d/v, where d is distance and v is average velocity. 2. A method as described in claim 1 , wherein the data describes one or more touch inputs received through detecting a part of a user's body by the touchscreen device. 3. A method as described in claim 1 , wherein the touchscreen device uses capacitive sensors. 4. A method as described in claim 1 , wherein the calculating compares velocity of the display of the moving item with velocity of the one or more touch inputs. 5. A method as described in claim 1 , wherein the calculating compares variance of the one or more touch inputs with the display of the moving item. 6. A method as described in claim 1 , wherein the calculating includes computing the distance between the position at which the item is displayed and the position at which the touch input is received at a plurality of different times. 7. A method as described in claim 1 , wherein the calculating includes analyzing the data to find a model that represents the data. 8. A computing device comprising: a touchscreen; and one or more modules implemented at least partially in hardware, the one or more modules configured to perform operations comprising: displaying a moving item on the touchscreen; receiving data that describes one or more touch inputs that are to follow the display of the moving item; and calculating end-to-end latency of the computing device based on the data corresponding to the one or more touch inputs and data describing the display of the moving item by at least computing a distance between a position at which the item is displayed and a position at which the touch input is received at a particular point in time, wherein the calculating involves the following expression to model the end-to-end latency: end-to-end latency=d/v, where d is distance and v is average velocity. 9. A computing device as described in claim 8 , wherein the data describes one or more touch inputs received through detecting a part of a user's body by the touchscreen device. 10. A computing device as described in claim 8 , wherein the touchscreen uses capacitive sensors. 11. A computing device as described in claim 8 , wherein the calculating compares velocity of the display of the moving item with velocity of the one or more touch inputs. 12. A computing device as described in claim 8 , wherein the calculating compares variance of the one or more touch inputs with the display of the moving item. 13. A computing device as described in claim 8 , wherein the calculating includes computing the distance between the position at which the item is displayed and the position at which the touch input is received at a plurality of different times. 14. A computing device as described in claim 8 , wherein the calculating includes analyzing the data to find a model that represents the data. 15. A method comprising: displaying an item by a touchscreen device; recording data that describes the displaying; receiving one or more touch inputs on the touchscreen device; recording data that describes the one or more touch inputs; and calculating end-to-end latency of the touchscreen device based on the data that describes the displaying and the data that describes the one or more touch inputs by at least computing a distance between a position at which the item is displayed and a position at which the touch input is received at a particular point in time, wherein the calculating involves the following expression to model the end-to-end latency: end-to-end latency=d/v, where d is distance and v is average velocity. 16. A method as described in claim 15 , wherein the touchscreen device uses capacitive sensors. 17. A method as described in claim 15 , wherein the item is a moving item and the calculating compares velocity of the display of the moving item with velocity of the one or more touch inputs. 18. A method as described in claim 15 , wherein the calculating compares variance of the one or more touch inputs with the display of the item at a plurality of different times.
for error correction or compensation, e.g. based on parallax, calibration or alignment · CPC title
by capacitive means · CPC title
using a grid-like structure of electrodes in at least two directions, e.g. using row and column electrodes · CPC title
to test input/output devices or peripheral units · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.