Fast face image capture system
US-11995914-B2 · May 28, 2024 · US
US9384386B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9384386-B2 |
| Application number | US-201414472981-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Aug 29, 2014 |
| Priority date | Aug 29, 2014 |
| Publication date | Jul 5, 2016 |
| Grant date | Jul 5, 2016 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Disclosed herein are methods and systems for increasing facial-recognition working range through adaptive super-resolution. One embodiment takes the form of a process that includes calculating one or more video metrics with respect to an input set of video frames. The process also includes obtaining a metric-specific weighting factor for each of the calculated video metrics. The process also includes calculating a weighted sum based on the obtained metric-specific weighting factors and the corresponding calculated video metrics. The process also includes selecting, based at least in part on the calculated weighted sum, a super-resolution technique from among a plurality of super-resolution techniques. The process also includes outputting an indication of the selected super-resolution technique.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A method for selecting a super-resolution technique for improved face recognition performance, the method including: calculating one or more video metrics with respect to an input set of video frames; obtaining a metric-specific weighting factor for each of the calculated video metrics; calculating a weighted sum based on the obtained metric-specific weighting factors and the corresponding calculated video metrics; selecting, based on the calculated weighted sum, a particular super-resolution technique from among a plurality of pre-determined super-resolution techniques by referencing correlation data that maps ranges of weighted sums to corresponding super-resolution techniques; and using the selected super-resolution technique to generate a super-resolved set of video frames by applying the selected super-resolution technique to the input set of video frames. 2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising selecting one or more configuration parameters for the selected particular super-resolution technique based on one or more of the calculated video metrics. 3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more calculated video metrics includes a temporal-motion metric. 4. The method of claim 3 , further comprising selecting a super-resolution regularization configuration parameter based on the temporal-motion metric. 5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more calculated video metrics includes an illumination-changes metric. 6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more calculated video metrics includes a blockiness metric. 7. The method of claim 1 , wherein calculating the weighted sum based on the obtained metric-specific weighting factors and the corresponding calculated video metrics includes: calculating respective products of the obtained metric-specific weighting factors and the corresponding calculated video metrics; and calculating the weighted sum as the sum of the calculated products. 8. The method of claim 1 , further including: obtaining training-metric data at least in part by calculating one or more of the video metrics with respect to one or more training sets of video frames; obtaining training-technique-result data at least in part by applying one or more of the super-resolution techniques in the plurality of super-resolution techniques to one or more of the training sets of video frames; and calibrating the correlation data based at least in part on the obtained training-metric data and at least in part on the obtained training-technique-result data. 9. The method of claim 8 , wherein calibrating the correlation data includes calibrating one or more of the metric-specific weighting factors. 10. The method of claim 8 , wherein the ranges of weighted sums are defined by respective range boundaries, and wherein calibrating the correlation data includes calibrating one or more of the range boundaries. 11. The method of claim 8 , wherein the obtained training-technique-result data includes one or more face-recognition-system confidence scores. 12. The method of claim 8 , wherein the obtained training-technique-result data includes received user-feedback data. 13. The method of claim 1 , further including performing face recognition on the super-resolved set of video frames. 14. The method of claim 1 , further including: obtaining a first face-recognition identification and a first face-recognition confidence score for the super-resolved set of video frames; obtaining a second face-recognition identification and a second face-recognition confidence score for the input set of video frames; outputting an indication of the first face-recognition identification when the first face-recognition confidence score exceeds the second face-recognition confidence score; and outputting an indication of the second face-recognition identification when the second face-recognition confidence score exceeds the first face-recognition confidence score. 15. The method of claim 1 , the method further including: obtaining operational-results data at least in part by performing face recognition on the super-resolved input set of video frames; and calibrating the correlation data based on one or more of the calculated video metrics and at least in part on the obtained operational-results data. 16. The method of claim 15 , wherein the obtained operational-results data includes one or more face-recognition-system confidence scores. 17. The method of claim 15 , wherein the obtained operational-results data includes received user-feedback data. 18. A system for selecting a super-resolution technique for improved face recognition performance, the system including: a communication interface; a processor; and data storage containing instructions executable by the processor for causing the system to carry out a set of functions, the set of functions including: calculating one or more video metrics with respect to an input set of video frames; obtaining a metric-specific weighting factor for each of the calculated video metrics; calculating a weighted sum based on the obtained metric-specific weighting factors and the corresponding calculated video metrics; selecting, based on the calculated weighted sum, a particular super-resolution technique from among a plurality of pre-determined super-resolution techniques by referencing correlation data that maps ranges of weighted sums to corresponding super-resolution techniques; and using the selected super-resolution technique to generate a super-resolved set of video frames by applying the selected super-resolution technique to the input set of video frames.
face re-identification, e.g. recognising unknown faces across different face tracks · CPC title
using comparisons between temporally consecutive images · CPC title
Evaluation of the quality of the acquired pattern · CPC title
Physics · mapped topic
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.