Systems and methods for disambiguating a voice search query
US-2024005923-A1 · Jan 4, 2024 · US
US9384275B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9384275-B2 |
| Application number | US-201414195816-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Mar 3, 2014 |
| Priority date | Sep 10, 2007 |
| Publication date | Jul 5, 2016 |
| Grant date | Jul 5, 2016 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A computer-implemented system and method for building an implicit music recommendation is presented. Listening habits and selections of a recommender are monitored. A determination that the recommender has repeatedly listened to a particular music selection is made. A recommendation is generated for the repeated music selection. The recommendation is transmitted to one or more recipients on behalf of the recommender.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A computer-implemented system for building an implicit music recommendation, comprising: a recommender to monitor listening habits and selections of the recommender, to determine that the recommender has repeatedly listened to a particular music selection, to generate a recommendation for the repeated music selection, and to transmit the recommendation to one or more recipients; and a digital media player to display the recommendation to the recipient based on a level of trustworthiness of the recommender. 2. A system according to claim 1 , wherein the recipients of the recommendation comprise those recipients to whom similar recommendations have been sent in the past. 3. A system according to claim 1 , wherein the music selection originates from an ambient source that is approved by a user for music logging. 4. A system according to claim 1 , wherein the recommender tracks the recommendation upon transmission to the recipients by assigning a status to the recommendation, wherein the status comprises one or more of “in transit,” “read,” “unread,” “discarded” and “purchased,” and maintaining a list of statuses for the recommendation, and by maintaining a recipient list for the recommendation. 5. A system according to claim 1 , wherein the recommender provides an annotation for the recommendation and associates the annotation with the recommendation. 6. A system according to claim 1 , wherein the digital media player discards the recommendation when the trustworthiness is determined to be untrusted. 7. A system according to claim 1 , wherein the recommendation is matched with an upcoming event via a calendar. 8. A system according to claim 1 , wherein the recommender associates information about the recommender with the recommendation. 9. A system according to claim 1 , wherein the recommendation comprises at least one of a song title, limited excerpt of a song, single song, selection of songs, album, and music compilation. 10. A computer-implemented method for building an implicit music recommendation, comprising: monitoring listening habits and selections of a recommender; determining that the recommender has repeatedly listened to a particular music selection; generating a recommendation for the repeated music selection; and transmitting, on behalf of the recommender, the recommendation to one or more recipients by displaying the recommendation within a display of the recipient based on a level of trustworthiness of the recommender. 11. A method according to claim 10 , wherein the recipients of the recommendation comprise those recipients to whom similar recommendations have been sent in the past. 12. A method according to claim 10 , wherein the music selection originates from an ambient source that is approved by a user for music logging. 13. A method according to claim 10 , further comprising: tracking the recommendation upon transmission to the recipients, comprising at least one of: assigning a status to the recommendation, wherein the status comprises one or more of “in transit,” “read,” “unread,” “discarded” and “purchased,” and maintaining a list of statuses for the recommendation; and maintaining a recipient list for the recommendation. 14. A method according to claim 10 , further comprising: receiving from the recommender, an annotation for the recommendation; and associating the annotation with the recommendation. 15. A method according to claim 10 , further comprising: discarding the recommendation when the trustworthiness is determined to be untrusted. 16. A method according to claim 10 , further comprising: matching the recommendation with an upcoming event via a calendar. 17. A method according to claim 10 , further comprising: associating information about the recommender with the recommendation. 18. A method according to claim 10 , wherein the recommendation comprises at least one of a song title, limited excerpt of a song, single song, selection of songs, album, and music compilation.
Filtering based on additional data, e.g. user or group profiles · CPC title
by investigating goods or services · CPC title
Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising · CPC title
Presentation of query results · CPC title
using playlists · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.