Failure determination method for motor system

Patent metadata

Field	Value
Publication number	US-9372236-B2
Application number	US-201414550944-A
Country	US
Kind code	B2
Filing date	Nov 22, 2014
Priority date	Jun 13, 2014
Publication date	Jun 21, 2016
Grant date	Jun 21, 2016

Abstract

A failure determination method for a motor system includes setting a current value required to initially drive a motor to a first current command value, increasing a rotational speed of a rotating magnetic field of the motor up to a preset reference speed, comparing an intensity of a back electromotive force, generated when a rotor of the motor is rotated at the preset reference speed, to a magnitude of a voltage applied to apply current in accordance with the set first current command value, and determining a cause of a failure of the motor based on the comparison.

First claim

What is claimed is:

1. A failure determination method for a motor system, comprising:
setting a current value required to initially drive a motor to a first current command value;
increasing a rotational speed of a rotating magnetic field of the motor to a preset reference speed;
comparing an intensity of a back electromotive force, generated when a rotor of the motor is rotated at the preset reference speed, to a magnitude of a voltage applied to apply current in accordance with the set first current command value; and
determining a cause of a failure of the motor based on the comparison.

2. The failure determination method of claim 1 , further comprising determining whether an error between the first current command value and a sensed value of current flowing through the motor is less than a preset error,
wherein the error represents a difference between the first current command value and the sensed value of current flowing through the motor.

3. The failure determination method of claim 2 , wherein the comparing of the intensity of the back electromotive force to the magnitude of the applied voltage is performed when it is determined that the error is less than the preset error.

4. The failure determination method of claim 2 , further comprising, when it is determined that the error is equal to or greater than the preset error, determining that a switching element of an inverter for supplying a 3-phase current to the motor has failed.

5. The failure determination method of claim 1 , wherein the determining of the cause of the failure of the motor comprises determining that a position sensor of the motor has failed, when, based on the comparison, the intensity of the back electromotive force is less than the magnitude of the applied voltage.

6. The failure determination method of claim 1 , further comprising determining whether, based on the comparison, the intensity of the back electromotive force is greater than the magnitude of the applied voltage for a preset time.

7. The failure determination method of claim 6 , wherein the determining of the cause of the failure of the motor comprises determining the cause of the failure to be constraint of the rotor of the motor, when the intensity of the back electromotive force is greater than the magnitude of the applied voltage for the preset time.

8. The failure determination method of claim 1 , further comprising, when, based on the comparison, the intensity of the back electromotive force is greater than the magnitude of the applied voltage, initializing the set current command value to zero.

9. The failure determination method of claim 8 , further comprising, after the initialization, repeating for a preset number of times: i) increasing the rotational speed of the rotating magnetic field to the preset reference speed, ii) comparing the intensity of the back electromotive force to the magnitude of the applied voltage, and iii) initializing the set current command value based on the comparison.

10. The failure determination method of claim 9 , wherein, when a number of the repetitions exceeds the preset number of times, the cause of the failure is determined to be constraint of the rotor of the motor.

11. The failure determination method of claim 1 , wherein the determining of the cause of the failure of the motor comprises determining the cause of the failure to be constraint of the rotor of the motor, when, based on the comparison, the intensity of the back electromotive force is greater than the magnitude of the applied voltage.

12. The failure determination method of claim 1 , further comprising, when a second current command value of the motor, which is determined based on a speed command value, is greater than a minimum current value required to rotate the motor, and when a phase voltage value applied to the motor is greater than a minimum phase voltage value required to rotate the motor, determining whether a value sensed by a position sensor of the motor is varied.

13. The failure determination method of claim 12 , wherein, when the value sensed by the position sensor of the motor is not varied, the current value required to initially drive the motor is set to the first current command value, and the rotational speed of the rotating magnetic field of the motor is increased to the preset reference speed.

14. A failure determination method for a motor system, comprising:
increasing a phase voltage applied to a motor to a phase voltage required to initially drive the motor;
increasing a rotational speed of a rotating magnetic field of the motor to a preset reference speed;
measuring a magnitude of current generated by the applied phase voltage;
comparing the magnitude of the generated current to a magnitude of a preset reference current; and
determining a cause of a failure of the motor based on the comparison.

15. The failure determination method of claim 14 , wherein the determining of the cause of the failure comprises determining that a position sensor of the motor has failed, when, based on the comparison, an error between the magnitude of the preset reference current and the magnitude of the current generated by the applied phase voltage is equal to or greater than a preset error,
wherein the error represents a difference between the first current command value and the sensed value of current flowing through the motor.

16. The failure determination method of claim 15 , wherein the determining of the cause of the failure comprises determining the cause of the failure to be constraint of a rotor of the motor, when, based on the comparison, the error between the magnitude of the preset reference current and the magnitude of the current generated by the applied phase voltage is less than the preset error.

17. The failure determination method of claim 15 , further comprising, when, based on the comparison, the error between the magnitude of the preset reference current and the magnitude of the current generated by the applied phase voltage is less than the preset error, initializing the phase voltage applied to the motor.

18. The failure determination method of claim 17 , further comprising, when a time for which the error is less than the preset error exceeds a preset time, repeating: i) increasing the rotational speed of the rotating magnetic field of the motor to the preset reference speed, ii) comparing the magnitude of the generated current to the magnitude of the preset reference current, and iii) initializing the phase voltage.

19. The failure determination method of claim 18 , wherein, when a number of the repetitions is greater than a preset number of times, the cause of the failure is determined to be constraint of a rotor of the motor.

20. The failure determination method of claim 14 , further comprising, when a sensed value of current flowing through the motor is greater than a minimum current value required to rotate the motor, determining an error between a current command value of the motor based on a speed command value and the sensed value of the current, wherein the error represents a difference between the current command value of the motor and the sensed value of the current.

21. The failure determination method of claim 20 , further comprising, when the error between the current command value of the motor and the sensed value of the current is less than a preset error, determining whether a value sensed by a position sensor of the motor is varied.

22. The failure determination method of claim 21 , wher

Assignees

• Hyundai Motor Co Ltd

Inventors

• Lee Dong Hun
• Kwon Soon Woo
• Lee Joon Yong
• Ryu Chang Seok

Classifications

• G01R31/343 Primary

  in operation · CPC title