Efficient combinatorial optimization by quantum-inspired parallel annealing in analogue memristor crossbar
US-2024419761-A1 · Dec 19, 2024 · US
US9355070B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9355070-B2 |
| Application number | US-201213678218-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Nov 15, 2012 |
| Priority date | Nov 15, 2011 |
| Publication date | May 31, 2016 |
| Grant date | May 31, 2016 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A system and method, implemented on a computer, for determining the uncertainty of soft-data debiasing of property distributions of spatially correlated reservoir data are provided. The method includes inputting, into the computer, soft-data at a plurality of spatial locations on a grid and hard-data at a plurality of location along well paths that intersect the grid. Each location of the hard-data is collocated with soft-data values of one or more types. The method further includes calculating, using the computer, a variogram of the hard-data and creating subsets of independent hard-data using the variogram and the soft-data values that are collocated with each of the hard-data location; applying, using the computer, a bootstrap process on each of the plurality of subsets of independent hard-data to obtain a plurality of bootstrap data sets from each of the plurality of subsets of independent hard-data; calculating soft-data debiased histograms for each of the obtained plurality of bootstrap data sets using a binary decision tree and the collocated soft-data; and characterizing the uncertainty of the soft-data debiased histograms.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A method, implemented on a computer, for determining the uncertainty of soft-data debiasing of property distributions of spatially correlated reservoir data, comprising: inputting, into the computer, soft-data at a plurality of spatial locations on a grid and hard-data at a plurality of location along well paths that intersect the grid, wherein each location of the hard-data is collocated with soft-data values of one or more types; calculating, using the computer, a variogram of the hard-data and creating subsets of independent hard-data using the variogram and the soft-data values that are collocated with each of the hard-data location; applying, using the computer, a bootstrap process on each of the plurality of subsets of independent hard-data to obtain a plurality of bootstrap data sets from each of the plurality of subsets of independent hard-data; calculating soft-data debiased histograms for each of the obtained plurality of bootstrap data sets using a binary decision tree and the collocated soft-data; characterizing the uncertainty of the soft-data debiased histograms; and using the soft-data debiased histograms and the uncertainty for a quantitative oil in place assessment. 2. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the soft data comprises seismic data, seismic attributes, or seismic inversion products, or any combination thereof, and the hard data comprises down-hole well logs of petrophysical properties. 3. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the soft-data, the hard-data, or both are weighted using weight factors to form a linear combination of soft-data or linear combination of hard-data or both. 4. The method according to claim 3 , wherein the weight factors are adjusted so that the correlation between the weighted hard-data and the collocated weighted soft-data is maximized so as to achieve a more linear relationship between the weighted hard-data and the weighted soft-data. 5. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising verifying that seismic impedance in the soft-data correlates with collocated well log impedance in the hard-data. 6. The method according to claim 1 , wherein calculating the soft-data debiased histograms comprises: inputting, into the computer, minimum and maximum confidence levels; selecting randomly, using the computer, a confidence level between the minimum and maximum confidence levels; sorting, using the computer, all data by soft-data value and putting all the data in one bin; determining, using the computer, a first split soft-data value that maximizes a difference in hard-data property values in the bin above the first soft-data split value and below the first soft-data split value; if the difference in hard-data property values is statistically significant at the selected confidence level accept the first split soft-data value; determining a second split soft-data value for a first sub-bin above the first split soft-data value that maximizes a difference in hard-data property values in a sub-bin within the first sub-bin above the second split soft-data value and below the second split soft-data value; and determining a third split soft-data value for a second sub-bin below the first split soft-data value that maximizes a difference in hard-data property values in a sub-bin within the second sub-bin above the third split soft-data value and below the third split soft-data value; and repeating the determining recursively until reaching the selected confidence level to form a binary tree decision tree of classification of bins. 7. The method according to claim 6 , further comprising: applying the binary decision tree classification of bins to each cell in a plurality of cells on the grid to predict a probability distribution of hard-data in each cell to obtain probability distributions of hard-data associated with the plurality of cells; and calculating the debiased soft-data histogram by a cell volume-weighted average of the probability distributions in each cell. 8. The method according to claim 1 , wherein applying the variogram comprises selecting a gamma value of the variogram according to the sample petrophysical data. 9. The method according to claim 8 , wherein selecting the gamma value comprises selecting a gamma value in a range between 0.3 and 1. 10. The method according to claim 9 , wherein selecting the gamma value comprises selecting a gamma value greater than 0.5. 11. The method according to claim 1 , wherein applying the bootstrap process comprises applying a resampling bootstrap process on each of the plurality of subsets of data. 12. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising: selecting a statistical parameter for ranking statistical distributions; ranking the histograms by using a selected statistical parameter to obtain ranked soft-data debiased histograms; and characterizing the uncertainty of the soft-data debiased histograms based on the ranked soft-data debiased histograms. 13. The method according to claim 12 , wherein ranking the data distributions by using the selected statistical parameter comprises applying a vector-scalar transform to the soft-data histograms to obtain scalar values, each scalar value being associated with a histogram, and ranking the soft-data histograms according to the obtained scalar values. 14. The method according to claim 13 , wherein applying the vector-scalar transform comprises applying a mean function or a standard deviation function. 15. The method according to claim 14 , further comprising applying an ensemble averaging to a portion of the histograms that are ranked within a desired ranking ensemble averaging percentage. 16. A computer program product comprising a computer readable medium having instructions stored thereon when executed by a computer performs the method recited in claim 1 . 17. A computer system for determining the uncertainty of soft-data debiasing of property distributions of spatially correlated reservoir data, the system comprising: a storage device configured to store soft-data at a plurality of spatial locations on a grid and hard-data along well paths that intersect the grid; a processor configured to output a graphical user interface, the graphical user interface comprising a plurality of fields for inputting parameters, wherein the processor is configured to: calculate a variogram of the hard-data and creating subsets of independent hard-data using a variogram; apply a bootstrap process on each of the plurality of subsets of independent hard-data to obtain a plurality of bootstrap data sets from each of the plurality of subsets of independent hard-data; calculate soft-data debiased histograms for each of the obtained plurality of bootstrap data sets using a binary decision tree; characterize the uncertainty of the soft-data debiased histograms; and use the soft-data debiased histograms and the uncertainty for a quantitative oil in place assessment. 18. The system according to claim 17 , wherein the soft data comprises seismic data, seismic attributes, or seismic inversion products, or any combination thereof, and the hard data comprises down-hole well logs of petrophysical properties. 19. The system according to claim 17 , wherein the soft-data, the hard-data, or both are weighted using weight factors to form a linear combination of soft-data or linear combination of hard-data or both. 20. The system according to claim 19 , wherein the weight factors are adjusted so that the correlation between the weighted hard-data
using geostatistical modeling · CPC title
for evaluating statistical data {, e.g. average values, frequency distributions, probability functions, regression analysis (forecasting specially adapted for a specific administrative, business or logistic context G06Q10/04)} · CPC title
Determining confidence or uncertainty in parameters · CPC title
Prospecting or detecting by methods combining techniques covered by two or more of main groups G01V1/00 - G01V9/00 · CPC title
Porosity · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.