Module and method pertaining to mode choice when determining reference values

Patent metadata

Field	Value
Publication number	US-9352750-B2
Application number	US-201114367571-A
Country	US
Kind code	B2
Filing date	Dec 22, 2011
Priority date	Dec 22, 2011
Publication date	May 31, 2016
Grant date	May 31, 2016

Abstract

A reference value for controlling a vehicle's speed is obtained by: receiving a choice from two selectable driving modes, each driving mode having a unique set of settings that influence the calculation of the reference value; making a first prediction, based on an engine torque T ret that retards the vehicle as compared with conventional cruise control, and a second prediction based on an engine torque T acc that accelerates the vehicle as compared with conventional cruise control; comparing the first and second predictions with a lower limit value and/or an upper limit value, which delineate a speed range within which the speed should be; and determining the reference value based on the mode choice and on at least one of the comparisons and said first prediction and second prediction of the speed along the horizon, such that the reference value is within the speed range.

First claim

The invention claimed is:

1. A vehicle speed regulator module configured to control a speed of a vehicle based on at least one reference value, such that such the at least one reference value differs from a value corresponding to the speed indicated by a driver of the vehicle, the module comprising:
a mode selection input unit configured to receive a mode choice from at least two selectable driving modes, each driving mode comprising a setting that influences a calculation of the at least one reference value;
a reference value calculation unit configured:
to make a first prediction and a second prediction of the speed along an itinerary, said first prediction based on an engine torque which retards the vehicle as compared with the speed regulator in which the reference value equals the speed indicated by the driver, and said second prediction based on an engine torque which accelerates the vehicle as compared with the speed regulator in which the reference value equals the speed indicated by the driver;
to compare said first prediction and the second prediction, respectively, with a lower limit value and/or an upper limit value, wherein the lower and upper limit values delineate a speed range within which the speed is maintained; and
to determine the at least one reference value based on the mode choice received and based on at least one of said comparisons and said first prediction and second prediction so that the at least one reference value is within the speed range bounded by the lower and upper limit values; and
the vehicle speed regulator module configured to regulate the speed of the vehicle based on the at least one reference value determined.

2. The module according to claim 1 , wherein the lower and upper limit values and are defined based on the mode choice.

3. The module according to claim 1 , wherein a further lower limit value and a further upper limit value are defined based on the mode choice and are related to the speed indicated by the driver.

4. The module according to claim 1 , wherein the mode choice decides how said at least one reference value is determined.

5. The module according to claim 1 , wherein when said at least one reference value is a reference speed, the mode choice defines a permissible acceleration and/or retardation of the vehicle.

6. The module according to claim 1 , wherein the mode choice defines a weighting parameter β which is used in evaluation of one or more cost functions when determining said at least one reference value.

7. The module according to claim 6 , wherein the calculation unit is configured to evaluate a cost for at least one of said first prediction, said second prediction and a further first prediction v pred _ Tk+new _ ret , and a further second prediction v pred _ Tk+new _ acc of the speed by using at least one cost function J Tnew _ ret , J Tnew _ acc , J Tk+new _ ret , J Tk+new _ acc .

8. The module according to claim 7 , wherein the calculation unit is configured to determine the respective cost functions J Tnew _ ret , J Tnew _ acc , J Tk+new _ ret and J Tk+new _ acc for said first prediction, said second prediction, said further first prediction and said further second prediction by weighting with a weighting parameter β their respective energy reductions and journey time reductions relative to a conventional prediction v pred _ cc of the speed.

9. The module according to claim 8 , wherein the calculation unit is configured to compare the cost functions J Tnew _ ret , J Tnew _ acc , J Tk+new _ ret and J Tk+new _ acc for said first prediction, said second prediction, said further first prediction and said further second prediction,
wherein said at least one reference value is determined based on the comparison to arrive at lowest cost.

10. A vehicle comprising the module of claim 1 .

11. A method of determining at least one reference value for a speed regulator that controls a speed of a vehicle such that said reference value that differs from a value corresponding to the speed indicated by a driver of the vehicle, the method comprising:
receiving a mode choice from at least two selectable driving modes, each mode choice comprising a setting that influences calculation of the at least one reference value;
making a first prediction and a second prediction of the speed along an itinerary, said first prediction based on an engine torque which retards the vehicle as compared with speed regulator in which the reference value equals the speed indicated by the driver, and said second prediction based on an engine torque which accelerates the vehicle as compared with the speed regulator in which the reference value equals the speed indicated by the driver;
comparing said first prediction and second prediction, respectively, with a lower limit value and/or an upper limit value, wherein the lower limit value and the upper limit value delineate a speed range within which the speed of the vehicle is maintained;
determining, by an automated digital processor circuit, the at least one reference value based on said mode choice and on at least one of said comparisons and said first prediction and second prediction so that the at least one reference value is within the speed range bounded by the lower and upper limit values; and
outputting the at least one reference value determined to a vehicle control system for controlling the speed of the vehicle.

12. The method according to claim 11 , wherein the lower and upper limit values are defined based on the mode choice.

13. The method according to claim 11 , wherein a further lower limit value and a further upper limit value are defined based on the mode choice and are related to the speed indicated by the driver.

14. The method according to claim 11 , wherein the mode choice decides how said at least one reference value is determined.

15. The method according to claim 11 , wherein when said at least one reference value is a reference speed, and the mode choice defines a permissible acceleration and/or retardation of the vehicle.

16. The method according to claim 11 , wherein the method further comprises:
using at least one cost function for the determining of the at least one reference value; and
evaluating the at least one cost function based on a weighting parameter β defined according to the mode choice.

17. The method according to claim 16 , wherein the method further comprises:
using a cost function for the determining of said at least one reference value, the cost function evaluating a cost for at least one of said first prediction, said second prediction and a further first prediction v pred _ Tk+new _ ret , and a further second prediction v pred _ Tk+new _ acc of the speed,
wherein the cost function is at least one cost function of the cost functions J Tnew _ ret , J Tnew _ acc , J Tk+new _ ret , J Tk+new _ acc .

18. The method according to claim 17 , wherein the cost functions J Tnew _ ret , J Tnew _ acc , J Tk+new _ ret and J Tk+new _ acc for said first prediction, said second prediction, said further first prediction and said further second prediction are determined by weighting with a weighting parameter β their respective energy reductions and journey time reductions relative to a conventional prediction v pred _ cc of the speed.

19. The method according to claim 18 , wherein the method further comprises:
comparing the cost functions J Tnew _ ret , J Tnew _ acc , J Tk+new _ ret

Assignees

• Johansson Oskar
• Södergren Maria
• Roos Fredrik
• Scania Cv Ab

Inventors

• Johansson Oskar
• Södergren Maria
• Roos Fredrik

Classifications

• B60W30/143

  Speed control (B60W30/16 takes precedence) · CPC title

• B60W50/082

  Selecting or switching between different modes of propelling · CPC title

• B60K31/00 Primary

  Vehicle fittings, acting on a single sub-unit only, for automatically controlling vehicle speed, i.e. preventing speed from exceeding an arbitrarily established velocity or maintaining speed at a particular velocity, as selected by the vehicle operator · CPC title

• G05B13/04

  involving the use of models or simulators · CPC title

• B60W2552/15

  Road slope, i.e. the inclination of a road segment in the longitudinal direction · CPC title