User interface methods for alternate tool modes for robotic surgical tools

Patent metadata

Field	Value
Publication number	US-9339343-B2
Application number	US-201213533277-A
Country	US
Kind code	B2
Filing date	Jun 26, 2012
Priority date	Sep 30, 2007
Publication date	May 17, 2016
Grant date	May 17, 2016

Abstract

In one implementation, a method is disclosed in which a lock sensing mode is entered for a robotic surgical instrument. In the lock sensing mode, the degrees of freedom of movement in the robotic surgical instrument are switchably reduced. Further in the lock sensing mode, one or more end effectors of the robotic surgical instrument are switchably clamped together in the robotic surgical instrument. An increased level of torque may also be applied to the end effectors to increase a gripping force applied by the one or more end effectors in response to the reduced degrees of freedom of movement in the robotic surgical instrument.

First claim

What is claimed is:

1. A method for a robotic surgical system including a master control console and one or more robotic surgical tools, the method comprising:
sensing for a first mode selection signal of the master control console to enter a lock sensing mode;
in the lock sensing mode, sensing for a first hard stop in a first squeezing together of a pair of master grips of a touch sensitive handle, to enter a lock mode for a robotic surgical tool;
in the lock mode, sensing for a second hard stop in a second squeezing together of the pair of master grips of the touch sensitive handle, to exit the lock mode for the robotic surgical tool; and
in the lock sensing mode, sensing for a second mode selection signal of the master control console to exit the lock sensing mode.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein a control input mechanism controls entry into and exit from the lock sensing mode.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein
the control input mechanism is a mode selection switch,
the sensing for the first mode selection signal is a sensing for a first activation of the mode selection switch, and
the sensing for the second mode selection signal is a sensing for a second activation of the mode selection switch.

4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:
locking a wrist of the robotic surgical tool in response to the lock mode.

5. The method of claim 4 , further comprising:
ratcheting end effectors of the robotic surgical tool in response to the lock mode.

6. The method of claim 4 , further comprising:
clamping end effectors of the robotic surgical tool together and increasing the torque applied to the end effectors in response to the lock mode.

7. The method of claim 4 , further comprising:
releasing end effectors of the robotic surgical tool in response to sensing the second hard stop.

8. The method of claim 7 , further comprising:
unlocking the wrist of the robotic surgical tool in response to sensing the second hard stop.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein
at least one or more elements of the method are controlled by instructions stored on a computer readable medium and performed by a processor.

10. A method for a robotic surgical system including a master control console and one or more robotic surgical tools, the method comprising:
sensing for a first alternate user input signal from a user controlled input mechanism of the master control console to enter an alternate sensing mode;
in the alternate sensing mode, sensing for a second alternate user input signal from a first squeezing together of a pair of master grips of a touch sensitive handle to enter an alternate tool mode differing from a normal tool mode;
alternatively controlling a robotic surgical tool in response to the alternative tool mode being sensed for the first time; and
in the alternate tool mode, further sensing for the second alternate user input signal from a second squeezing together of the pair of master grips of the touch sensitive handle to exit the alternate tool mode.

11. The method of claim 10 , further comprising
in response to exiting the alternative tool mode, sensing for the first alternate user input signal from the user controlled input mechanism to exit the alternate sensing mode.

12. The method of claim 10 , wherein
the user controlled input mechanism is a mode selection switch.

13. The method of claim 10 , wherein
the user controlled input mechanism is near the pair of master grips of the touch sensitive handle.

14. The method of claim 10 , wherein
at least one sensing is controlled by instructions stored on a computer readable medium and performed by a processor.

15. The method of claim 10 , wherein the alternate tool mode is a lock mode for a robotic surgical tool and the method further comprises:
locking a wrist of the robotic surgical tool.

16. The method of claim 15 , further comprising:
ratcheting end effectors of the robotic surgical tool in response to the lock mode.

17. The method of claim 15 , further comprising:
clamping end effectors of the robotic surgical tool together and increasing the torque applied to the end effectors in response to the lock mode.

18. The method of claim 15 , wherein the second alternate user input signal was sensed a second time and the method further comprises:
releasing end effectors of the robotic surgical tool.

19. The method of claim 18 , further comprising:
unlocking the wrist of the robotic surgical tool in response to sensing the second alternate user input signal for the second time.

20. The method of claim 10 , wherein
the alternate controlling is performed by a processor in response to execution of instructions stored in a computer readable medium.

Assignees

• Swarup Nitish
• Manzo Scott E
• Intuitive Surgical Operations

Inventors

• Swarup Nitish
• Manzo Scott E

Classifications

• A61B19/5212

  Human Necessities · mapped topic

• A61B2017/00477

  Coupling (A61B2017/0046 takes precedence) · CPC title

• A61B2019/2223

  Human Necessities · mapped topic

• A61B2019/2246

  Human Necessities · mapped topic

• A61B2019/2234

  Human Necessities · mapped topic