Simplified Hash Table
US-2024422006-A1 · Dec 19, 2024 · US
US9329892B1 · US · B1
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9329892-B1 |
| Application number | US-201514864130-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B1 |
| Filing date | Sep 24, 2015 |
| Priority date | Jul 13, 2012 |
| Publication date | May 3, 2016 |
| Grant date | May 3, 2016 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Multiple scheduler verticals can allocate tasks to resources that are shared by the scheduler verticals. Information regarding a state of each resource may be stored in memory accessible by the multiple scheduler verticals, and a processor updates the information. The scheduler verticals schedule events to be performed by any of the resources, and submit updates to reflect the scheduled events in the information. In the event of conflicting events, an update corresponding to only one of the conflicting events is committed. Moreover, disruptions may be preplanned and scheduled so as to minimize impact on scheduled tasks.
Opening claim text (preview).
The invention claimed is: 1. A system, comprising: a set of two or more hardware scheduler verticals adapted to receive requests for work to be performed by one or more of a plurality of machines; a memory storing information regarding a state of each of the plurality of machines; and a processor for use in updating the information; wherein the scheduler verticals are adapted to retrieve copies of the information, schedule events other than disruptions to be performed by any of the plurality of machines, and submit updates to reflect the scheduled events in the information; and wherein if multiple scheduler verticals schedule conflicting events for a given machine, an update transaction submitted by one of such scheduler verticals is committed and the remaining scheduled events are rejected. 2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the processor is operable to determine which of the conflicting events to commit to memory based on timing of submission of the updates. 3. The system of claim 1 , wherein the processor is operable to determine which of the conflicting events to commit to memory based on priority of each conflicting event. 4. The system of claim 1 , wherein the memory includes a calendar storing the committed events. 5. A method of concurrently scheduling, using a plurality of scheduler verticals, events to be performed by one or more machines, comprising: receiving requests for work to be performed, the work including one or more events and not including disruptions; receiving information regarding a state of the one or more machines; scheduling, using the plurality of scheduler verticals, the one or more events on the one or more machines; submitting the scheduled events to memory; determining, using a processor, whether conflicting events are submitted to memory; if conflicting events are submitted to memory, committing one of the conflicting events to memory and rejecting the remaining conflicting events. 6. The method of claim 5 , further comprising determining which of the conflicting events to commit to memory, the determining based on a timing associated with the submitting of the scheduled events. 7. The method of claim 5 , further comprising determining which of the conflicting events to commit to memory, the determining based on priority of each conflicting event. 8. The method of claim 5 , wherein submitting the scheduled events to memory is performed incrementally if multiple events are simultaneously scheduled on the machine. 9. The method of claim 8 , wherein each of the incrementally submitted events is committed to memory if it is not a conflicting event. 10. The method of claim 5 , wherein the events are tasks of a job, and if it is determined that any of the tasks will be rejected due to a conflict, none of the tasks are committed to memory.
Scheduling strategies for dispatcher, e.g. round robin, multi-level priority queues · CPC title
Priority circuits therefor · CPC title
the resource being a machine, e.g. CPUs, Servers, Terminals · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.