Non-intrusive automated storage tiering using information of front end storage activities

US9323682B1 · US · B1

Patent metadata
FieldValue
Publication numberUS-9323682-B1
Application numberUS-201313857548-A
CountryUS
Kind codeB1
Filing dateApr 5, 2013
Priority dateApr 5, 2013
Publication dateApr 26, 2016
Grant dateApr 26, 2016

How to read this patent

A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.

  1. Title

    What the patent document calls the invention.

  2. Abstract

    A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.

  3. Assignees and inventors

    Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.

  4. Key dates

    Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.

  5. First independent claim

    The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.

  6. CPC / IPC classifications

    Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.

  7. Citations and related patents

    Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.

Abstract

Official abstract text for this publication.

A system and techniques are provided for evaluating front end activity of a storage device in connection with storage tiering and management operations at the back end without the need to collect new sub-LUN metrics/statistics on the front end or querying the front end. The system avoids demotions of extents that are hot on the front end even when seemingly cool on the back end. The result is improved system performance since data that is hot on the front end will not be demoted to a lower storage tier. The system provides that there is little to no additional performance impact on the front end because there is no requirement to collect any new front end statistics or query the front end, and there is no increase in the meta data collected by the automated tiering system as there is no new sub-LUN metrics collected on the front end.

First claim

Opening claim text (preview).

What is claimed is: 1. A method for managing data in a storage device having a front end and a back end, comprising: determining an extent of data stored on storage of the back end of the storage device as an extent demotion candidate subject to demotion at the back end; searching a cache memory of the front end of the storage device for at least some of the data of the demotion candidate; performing an evaluation algorithm based on result of the searching of the cache memory, wherein the evaluation algorithm includes determining whether any data of the demotion candidate stored in the cache memory has been accessed within a threshold amount of time; and based on the evaluation algorithm, determining whether demotion of the demotion candidate is to be delayed at the back end, wherein if it is determined by the evaluation algorithm that any data of the demotion candidate stored in the cache has been accessed within the threshold amount of time, demotion of the demotion candidate at the back end is delayed. 2. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the demotion includes moving data from a first storage tier to a second storage tier of the storage device. 3. The method according to claim 2 , wherein the second storage tier has a lower access speed than the first storage tier. 4. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the evaluation algorithm includes determining an amount of the data of the demotion candidate that is present in the cache. 5. The method of claim 4 , wherein the evaluation algorithm includes performing a weighted decision algorithm in accordance with weighting criteria including the amount of data of the demotion candidate that is present in cache. 6. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the evaluation algorithm includes determining a length of time in which the data of the demotion candidate has been present in the cache. 7. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the evaluation algorithm determines demotion of the demotion candidate is to be delayed at the back end by a specified time. 8. The method according to claim 1 , wherein determining extent demotion candidates at the back end includes determining an access characteristic of the data stored at the back end. 9. A non-transitory computer-readable medium storing software for managing data in a storage device having a front end and a back end, the software comprising: executable code that determines an extent of data stored on storage of the back end of the storage device as an extent demotion candidate subject to demotion at the back end; executable code that searches a cache memory of the front end of the storage device for at least some of the data of the demotion candidate; executable code that performs an evaluation algorithm based on result of the searching of the cache memory, wherein the evaluation algorithm includes determining whether any data of the demotion candidate stored in the cache memory has been accessed within a threshold amount of time; and executable code that, based on the evaluation algorithm, determines whether demotion of the demotion candidate is to be delayed at the back end, wherein if it is determined by the evaluation algorithm that any data of the demotion candidate stored in the cache has been accessed within the threshold amount of time, demotion of the demotion candidate at the back end is delayed. 10. The non-transitory computer-readable medium according to claim 9 , wherein the demotion includes moving data from a first storage tier to a second storage tier of the storage device. 11. The non-transitory computer-readable medium according to claim 10 , wherein the second storage tier has a lower access speed than the first storage tier. 12. The non-transitory computer-readable medium according to claim 9 , wherein the evaluation algorithm includes determining an amount of the data of the demotion candidate that is present in the cache. 13. The non-transitory computer-readable medium according to claim 9 , wherein the evaluation algorithm includes determining a length of time in which the data of the demotion candidate has been present in the cache. 14. The non-transitory computer-readable medium according to claim 9 , wherein the evaluation algorithm determines demotion of the demotion candidate is to be delayed at the back end by a specified time. 15. The non-transitory computer-readable medium according to claim 9 , wherein the executable code that determines extent demotion candidates at the back end includes executable code that determines an access characteristic of the data stored at the back end. 16. A storage device system, comprising: a front end having a cache; a back end having a physical storage area; a controller, wherein the controller includes at least one processor that executes software for managing data of the storage device, the software including: executable code that determines an extent of data stored on storage of the back end of the storage device as an extent demotion candidate subject to demotion at the back end; executable code that searches a cache memory of the front end of the storage device for at least some of the data of the demotion candidate; executable code that performs an evaluation algorithm based on result of the searching of the cache memory, wherein the evaluation algorithm includes determining whether any data of the demotion candidate stored in the cache memory has been accessed within a threshold amount of time; and executable code that, based on the evaluation algorithm, determines whether demotion of the demotion candidate is to be delayed at the back end, wherein if it is determined by the evaluation algorithm that any data of the demotion candidate stored in the cache has been accessed within the threshold amount of time, demotion of the demotion candidate at the back end is delayed. 17. The system according to claim 16 , wherein the demotion includes moving data from a first storage tier to a second storage tier of the storage device, wherein the second storage tier has a lower access speed than the first storage tier. 18. The system according to claim 16 , wherein the evaluation algorithm includes determining an amount of the data of the demotion candidate that is present in the cache. 19. The system according to claim 16 , wherein the evaluation algorithm includes determining a length of time in which the data of the demotion candidate has been present in the cache. 20. The system according to claim 16 , wherein the evaluation algorithm determines demotion of the demotion candidate is to be delayed at the back end by a specified time. 21. The system according to claim 16 , wherein the executable code that determines extent demotion candidates at the back end includes executable code that determines an access characteristic of the data stored at the back end.

Assignees

Inventors

Classifications

  • G06F12/121Primary

    using replacement algorithms · CPC title

  • Allocation or management of cache space · CPC title

  • for peripheral storage systems, e.g. disk cache · CPC title

  • Performance improvement · CPC title

  • Reconfiguration of cache memory · CPC title

Patent family

Related publications grouped by family.

External sources

Frequently asked questions

Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.

What does patent US9323682B1 cover?
A system and techniques are provided for evaluating front end activity of a storage device in connection with storage tiering and management operations at the back end without the need to collect new sub-LUN metrics/statistics on the front end or querying the front end. The system avoids demotions of extents that are hot on the front end even when seemingly cool on the back end. The result is i…
Who is the assignee on this patent?
Emc Corp
What technology area does this patent fall under?
Primary CPC classification G06F12/121. Mapped technology areas include Physics.
When was this patent published?
Publication date Tue Apr 26 2016 00:00:00 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) (B1). Legal status and post-grant events are not shown on this page.
What related patents are in patentsdb?
We list 8 related publications on this page (citations in our corpus or others sharing the same primary CPC).