Processes and systems for predicting corrosion

US9317635B2 · US · B2

Patent metadata
FieldValue
Publication numberUS-9317635-B2
Application numberUS-201313929037-A
CountryUS
Kind codeB2
Filing dateJun 27, 2013
Priority dateJun 29, 2012
Publication dateApr 19, 2016
Grant dateApr 19, 2016

How to read this patent

A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.

  1. Title

    What the patent document calls the invention.

  2. Abstract

    A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.

  3. Assignees and inventors

    Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.

  4. Key dates

    Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.

  5. First independent claim

    The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.

  6. CPC / IPC classifications

    Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.

  7. Citations and related patents

    Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.

Abstract

Official abstract text for this publication.

Systems and methods for evaluating the corrosion risk in operations with equipment for the handling an acid gas-containing solutes, e.g., an amine unit for the removal of acid gases such as H 2 S, CO 2 , etc., are provided. Input parameter values corresponding to geometrical parameters of at least an equipment (or a portion of an equipment) susceptible to corrosion risk, operating parameters, fluid dynamic properties, and properties of the solute are received by the system. Based on the input values, the systems and methods derive a minimum pressure above which acid gas flashing occurs given the localized pressure drop, causing corrosion in the identified location. In one embodiment, the systems and methods provide an assessment correlating acid gas loadings with the corrosion risk.

First claim

Opening claim text (preview).

The invention claimed is: 1. A method for evaluating corrosion risk in a unit handling an acid gas-containing solute, comprising: identifying at least a location in the unit for conducting the corrosion risk evaluation; receiving information about geometrical parameters of the location; receiving information about operating parameters, fluid dynamic properties, and properties of the solute in the unit; correlating fluid dynamics of the location in the unit with a shear stress value; predicting a corrosion rate for different acid gas loadings expressed as concentration of the acid gas in the solute responsive to the correlated shear stress; evaluating a localized pressure drop in the location due to the geometrical parameters; correlating a relationship between vapor saturation pressure and temperature data for the different acid gas loadings; identifying from the correlated vapor saturation pressure and temperature data a minimum pressure above which acid gas flashing from the solute occurs given the localized pressure drop, causing corrosion in the identified location. 2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: displaying the predicted corrosion rate as a function of the different acid gas loadings as a visual display. 3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the acid gas is H 2 S, the solute is amine, and the acid gas loadings are expressed as moles of H 2 S per mole of amine. 4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising correlating the minimum pressure below which acid gas flashing of acid gas occurs with a maximum acid gas loading for the identified location. 5. The method of claim 4 , further comprising: adjusting the acid gas loading to the unit to keep the acid gas loading below the maximum acid gas loading for the identified location. 6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the relationship between vapor saturation pressure and temperature data for the different acid gas loadings is correlated using a physical property software. 7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the relationship between vapor saturation pressure and temperature data for the different acid gas loadings is correlated using an empirical model. 8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the location is selected from any of a reducer, an elbow, an orifice plate, a negative step, a positive step, a slot, a pressure let down valve, and bottom of an absorber. 9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the location is a tube sheet end of a heat exchanger. 10. The method of claim 1 , wherein predicting a corrosion rate for different acid gas loadings responsive to the correlated shear stress comprises: calculating corrosion rate for different concentrations of acid gas in the solute as acid gas loadings under static conditions using at least an empirical correlation; calculating corrosion rate for different concentrations of acid gas in the solute as acid gas loadings under flowing conditions using at least an empirical correlation; and interpolating the calculated corrosion rate taking into account the correlated shear stress to obtain a corrosion rate for different concentrations of acid gas in the solute as acid gas loadings. 11. The method of claim 1 , wherein predicting a predicted corrosion rate for different acid gas loadings responsive to the correlated shear stress comprises: providing a database containing corrosion rate data for different concentrations of acid gas in the solute under different static and flowing conditions; obtaining from the database a predicted corrosion rate for different concentrations of acid gas in the solute as acid gas loadings; and interpolating the predicted corrosion rate for different concentrations of acid gas in the solute as acid gas loadings taking into account the correlated shear stress. 12. The method of claim 1 , wherein the corrosion risk evaluation is conducted for a plurality of locations in the unit to identify a maximum gas loading rate for each of the plurality locations. 13. The method of claim 12 , where the location having a lowest maximum gas loading rate is identified for corrosion risk monitoring. 14. The method of claim 1 , further comprising carrying out the corrosion risk evaluation for the at least a location under at least one of: varying solute types; varying acid gas concentrations in the solute; varying concentrations of the solute; varying temperatures; and combinations thereof. 15. The method of claim 1 , wherein receiving information about operating parameters, fluid dynamic properties, and properties of the solute in the unit comprises obtaining at least one of operating parameters, fluid dynamic properties, and properties of the solute in the unit from an on-line sensor; and obtaining at least one of operating parameters, fluid dynamic properties, and properties of the solute in the unit from data entry by an operator. 16. The method of claim 1 , for evaluating corrosion risk in any of an amine unit, a Reactor Effluent Air Cooler (REAC), a steam generation unit, and an alkylation unit. 17. A method for evaluating corrosion risk in an amine unit for removing H 2 S acid gas, comprising: identifying a plurality of locations in the amine unit to identify a maximum acid gas loading for each location; receiving information about geometrical parameters of each location; receiving information about operating parameters, fluid dynamic properties, and properties of amine in the amine unit; correlating fluid dynamics of each location in the amine unit with a shear stress value; predicting a corrosion rate for each location at different concentrations of H 2 S in amine as acid gas loadings expressed as concentration of H 2 S in amine responsive to the correlated shear stress for each location; evaluating localized pressure drop in each location due to the geometrical parameters; correlating a relationship between vapor saturation pressure and temperature data for the different acid gas loadings; and identifying from the correlated vapor saturation pressure and temperature data a maximum acid gas loading for each of the identified locations, given the localized pressure drop in each location, above which maximum loading rate flashing of H 2 S occurs. 18. The method of claim 17 , further comprising: identifying a location having the lowest maximum acid gas loading; and monitoring the location having the lowest maximum acid gas loading for corrosion risk. 19. The method of claim 18 , further comprising: adjusting the acid gas loading to the amine unit to below the lowest identified maximum acid gas loading. 20. The method of claim 17 , wherein the relationship between vapor saturation pressure and temperature data for different acid gas loadings is correlated using a physical property software. 21. The method of claim 17 , wherein the location is selected from any of a reducer, an elbow, an orifice plate, a negative step, a positive step, a slot, a pressure let down valve, and bottom of an absorber. 22. The method of claim 17 , wherein the location is a tube sheet end of a heat exchanger. 23. The method of claim 17 , wherein the relationship between vapor saturation pressure and temperature data for different acid gas loadings is correlated using a physical property software. 24. The method of claim 17 , wherein the relationship between vapor saturation pressure and temperature data for different acid gas loadings is correlated using an empirical model. 25. The method of

Assignees

Inventors

Classifications

  • Carbon dioxide · CPC title

  • Numerical modelling · CPC title

  • Controlling the absorption process · CPC title

  • Removing acid components · CPC title

  • Electrochemical measuring systems for weathering, corrosion or corrosion-protection measurement · CPC title

Patent family

Related publications grouped by family.

External sources

Frequently asked questions

Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.

What does patent US9317635B2 cover?
Systems and methods for evaluating the corrosion risk in operations with equipment for the handling an acid gas-containing solutes, e.g., an amine unit for the removal of acid gases such as H 2 S, CO 2 , etc., are provided. Input parameter values corresponding to geometrical parameters of at least an equipment (or a portion of an equipment) susceptible to corrosion risk, operating parameters, f…
Who is the assignee on this patent?
O'Connor Andrew Thomas, El Giheny Kyrolos Paul, Parten Sara Christine, and 6 more
What technology area does this patent fall under?
Primary CPC classification B01D53/1412. Mapped technology areas include Operations & Transport.
When was this patent published?
Publication date Tue Apr 19 2016 00:00:00 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) (B2). Legal status and post-grant events are not shown on this page.
What related patents are in patentsdb?
We list 8 related publications on this page (citations in our corpus or others sharing the same primary CPC).