Resilient video encoding control via explicit network indication

Patent metadata

Field	Value
Publication number	US-9313246-B2
Application number	US-201313736159-A
Country	US
Kind code	B2
Filing date	Jan 8, 2013
Priority date	Jun 29, 2012
Publication date	Apr 12, 2016
Grant date	Apr 12, 2016

Abstract

A STUN message is received at a router device in a network from a client device in the network along a network path. The STUN message is evaluated for information that indicates to the router device to modify media that is subsequently sent along the network path. If the evaluating indicates that the router device is to modify the media, the media is modified in accordance with information in the STUN message that indicates attributes of the network.

First claim

What is claimed is:

1. A method comprising:
at a Session Traversal Utilities for Network Address Translators (STUN) enabled router device among multiple router devices in a network:
receiving a STUN request from a source client device that is destined for a destination client device along a network data path that traverses the multiple router devices;
adding to a payload of the STUN request first node information that indicates a node hop-limit that specifies a number of hops that a packet is allowed before being discarded by a router, a hop-count that specifies a number of nodes that a packet has traversed, a direction attribute that specifies whether a packet is a request or a response, and an attribute of one of bandwidth, processing load, and congestion at the router device, to form a modified STUN request;
forwarding the modified STUN request toward the destination client device along the network data path;
receiving from the destination client device a STUN response that includes (i) the first node information that was copied from the STUN request into the STUN response at the destination client device, and (ii) further node information that indicates a node hop-limit, a hop-count, a direction attribute and an attribute of one of bandwidth, processing load, and congestion of a first other router device of the multiple router devices, wherein the further node information was added to the STUN request or the STUN response by the first other router device as the STUN request and STUN response traversed the multiple routers;
forwarding the STUN response to the source client device to enable the source client device to adjust a bit rate of rich media sent thereby to the destination client device along the network data path based on the first node information and the further node information; and
receiving from the source client device the rich media and reducing the bit rate or a quality thereof before forwarding the rich media to the first other router device if the further node information indicates the first other router device has less bandwidth than that of the STUN enabled router device.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:
evaluating the further node information in the STUN response, including the attribute of one of bandwidth, processing load, or congestion added by the first other router device; and
if the evaluating indicates that the first other router device has less bandwidth or a reduced processing capability relative to the router device, performing the reducing the bit rate or the quality of the rich media received from the source client device before forwarding the rich media to the first other router device.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein:
the received STUN request further includes node information that indicates one of bandwidth, processing load, and congestion of a second other router device of the multiple router devices and that was added to the STUN request by the second other router device as the STUN request traveled from the source client device to the router device; and
the adding includes only adding the first node information to the received STUN request if the one of bandwidth, processing load, and congestion at the router device is better or worse than a corresponding one of the bandwidth, processing load, and congestion at the second other router device as indicated in the node information added to the STUN request by the second other router device.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the rich media includes digital interactive media.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the reducing the bit rate or the quality of the rich media includes reducing the bit rate of the rich media.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the reducing the bit rate or the quality of the rich media includes reducing the bit rate or the quality in response to an indication in the STUN request that instructs the router device to adjust real time data in accordance with network conditions.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the STUN request is a Path Discovery request message and the STUN response is a Path Discovery response message.

8. An apparatus comprising:
a plurality of ports of a router device;
a memory unit; and
a processor coupled to the ports and the memory unit and configured to:
receive a Session Traversal Utilities for Network Address Translators (STUN) request from a source client device that is destined for a destination client device along a network data path that traverses multiple router devices;
add to a payload of the STUN request first node information that indicates a node hop-limit that specifies a number of hops that a packet is allowed before being discarded by a router, a hop-count that specifies a number of nodes that a packet has traversed, a direction attribute that specifies whether a packet is a request or a response, and an attribute of one of bandwidth, processing load, and congestion at the router device, to form a modified STUN request;
forward the modified STUN request toward the destination client device along the network data path;
receive from the destination client device a STUN response that includes (i) the first node information that was copied from the STUN request into the STUN response at the destination client device, and (ii) further node information that indicates a node hop-limit, a hop-count, a direction attribute and an attribute of one of bandwidth, processing load, and congestion of a first other router device of the multiple router devices, wherein the further node information was added to the STUN request or the STUN response by the first other router device as the STUN request and STUN response traversed the multiple routers;
forward the STUN response to the source client device to enable the source client device to adjust a bit rate of rich media sent thereby to the destination client device along the network data path based on the first node information and the further node information; and
receive from the source client device the rich media and reduce the bit rate or a quality thereof before forwarding the rich media to the first other router device if the further node information indicates the first other router device has less bandwidth than that of the router device.

9. The apparatus of claim 8 , wherein the processor is further configured to:
evaluate the further node information in the STUN response, including the attribute of one of bandwidth, processing load, or congestion added by the first other router device; and
if the evaluating indicates that the first other router device has less bandwidth or a reduced processing capability relative to the router device, reduce the bit rate or the quality of the rich media received from the source client device before forwarding the rich media to the first other router device.

10. The apparatus of claim 8 , wherein:
the received STUN request further includes node information that indicates one of bandwidth, processing load, and congestion of a second other router device of the multiple router devices added to the STUN request by the second other router device as the STUN request traveled from the source client device to the router device; and
the processor is further configured to only add the information to the received STUN request if the one of bandwidth, processing load, and congestion at the router device is better or worse than a corresponding one of the bandwidth, processing load, and congestion at the second other router device as indicated in the node information added to the STUN request by the second other router device.

11. The apparatus of claim 8 , wherein the rich media includes digital interactive media.

12. The apparatu

Assignees

• Cisco Tech Inc

Inventors

• Wegger Jan
• Sandbakken Geir
• Hakonsen Greg
• Patel Rahul

Classifications

• H04L61/2575 Primary

  using address mapping retrieval, e.g. simple traversal of user datagram protocol through session traversal utilities for NAT [STUN] · CPC title

• H04L65/80

  Responding to QoS · CPC title

• H04L45/74

  Address processing for routing · CPC title

• H04L61/2514

  between local and global IP addresses · CPC title

• H04L65/75

  Media network packet handling · CPC title