Power management using relative energy break-even time

US9292073B2 · US · B2

Patent metadata
FieldValue
Publication numberUS-9292073-B2
Application numberUS-201213688941-A
CountryUS
Kind codeB2
Filing dateNov 29, 2012
Priority dateDec 31, 2008
Publication dateMar 22, 2016
Grant dateMar 22, 2016

How to read this patent

A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.

  1. Title

    What the patent document calls the invention.

  2. Abstract

    A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.

  3. Assignees and inventors

    Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.

  4. Key dates

    Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.

  5. First independent claim

    The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.

  6. CPC / IPC classifications

    Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.

  7. Citations and related patents

    Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.

Abstract

Official abstract text for this publication.

Systems and methods may provide for determining an absolute energy break-even time for a first low power state with respect to a current state of a system. A relative energy break-even time may also be determined for the first low power state with respect to a second low power state based on at least in part the absolute energy break-even time. In addition, an operating state may be selected for the system based on at least in part the relative energy break-even time.

First claim

Opening claim text (preview).

We claim: 1. A computer implemented method comprising: determining an absolute energy break-even time for a first low power state with respect to a current state of a system; determining a relative energy break-even time for the first low power state with respect to a second low power state based on at least in part the absolute energy break-even time; and selecting an operating state for the system based on at least in part the relative energy break-even time. 2. The method of claim 1 , further including using a power consumption associated with the first low power state and a power consumption associated with the second low power state to determine the relative energy break-even time. 3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the second low power state is shallower and has a shorter exit latency than the first low power state. 4. The method of claim 3 , further including selecting the second low power state as the operating state if a projected idleness duration is less than the relative energy break-even time for the first low power state. 5. The method of claim 4 , wherein the projected idleness duration is greater than the absolute energy break-even time for the first low power state. 6. The method of claim 1 , further including: detecting a first break event from a first event source; detecting a second break event from a second event source; and coordinating issuance of the first and second break events to the system based on at least in part the relative energy break-even time. 7. The method of claim 6 , wherein coordination of the issuance of the first and second break events includes a determination of a holding time based on at least in part the relative energy break-even time, and a deference of at least one of the first and second break events based on at least in part the holding time. 8. A non-transitory computer readable storage medium comprising a set of instructions which, if executed by a processor, cause a computer to: determine an absolute energy break-even time for a first low power state with respect to a current state of a system; determine a relative energy break-even time for the first low power state with respect to a second low power state based on at least in part the absolute energy break-even time; and select an operating state for the system based on at least in part the relative energy break-even time. 9. The medium of claim 8 , wherein the instructions, if executed, cause a computer to further use a power consumption associated with the first low power state and a power consumption associated with the second low power state to determine the relative energy break-even time. 10. The medium of claim 8 , wherein the second low power state is to be shallower and is to have a shorter exit latency than the first low power state. 11. The medium of claim 10 , wherein the instructions, if executed, cause a computer to select the second low power state as the operating state if a projected idleness duration is less than the relative energy break-even time for the first low power state. 12. The medium of claim 11 , wherein the projected idleness duration is to be greater than the absolute energy break-even time for the first low power state. 13. The medium of claim 8 , wherein the instructions, if executed, cause a computer to: detect a first break event from a first event source; detect a second break event from a second event source; and coordinate issuance of the first and second break events to the system based on at least in part the relative energy break-even time. 14. The medium of claim 13 , wherein coordination of the issuance of the first and second break events is to include a determination of a holding time based on at least in part the relative energy break-even time, and a deference of at least one of the first and second break events based on at least in part the holding time. 15. An apparatus comprising: logic to, determine an absolute energy break-even time for a first low power state with respect to a current state of a system, determine a relative energy break-even time for the first low power state with respect to a second low power state based on at least in part the absolute energy break-even time, and select an operating state for the system based on at least in part the relative energy break-even time. 16. The apparatus of claim 15 , wherein the logic is to further use a power consumption associated with the first low power state and a power consumption associated with the second low power state to determine the relative energy break-even time. 17. The apparatus of claim 15 , wherein the second low power state is to be shallower and is to have a shorter exit latency than the first low power state. 18. The apparatus of claim 17 , wherein the logic is to select the second low power state as the operating state if a projected idleness duration is less than the relative energy break-even time for the first low power state. 19. The apparatus of claim 18 , wherein the projected idleness duration is to be greater than the absolute energy break-even time for the first low power state. 20. The apparatus of claim 15 , wherein the logic is to, detect a first break event from a first event source, detect a second break event from a second event source, and coordinate issuance of the first and second break events to the system based on at least in part the relative energy break-even time. 21. The apparatus of claim 20 , wherein coordination of the issuance of the first and second break events is to include a determination of a holding time based on at least in part the relative energy break-even time, and a deference of at least one of the first and second break events based on at least in part the holding time. 22. The apparatus of claim 15 , wherein the first and second low power states are to include at least one of a platform state, a processor state and a device state. 23. A platform comprising: a processor; and logic to, determine an absolute energy break-even time for a first low power state with respect to a current state of the processor, determine a relative energy break-even time for the first low power state with respect to a second low power state based on at least in part the absolute energy break-even time, and select an operating state for the processor based on at least in part the relative energy break-even time. 24. The platform of claim 23 , wherein the logic is to further use a power consumption associated with the first low power state and a power consumption associated with the second low power state to determine the relative energy break-even time. 25. The platform of claim 23 , wherein the second low power state is to be shallower and is to have a shorter exit latency than the first low power state. 26. The platform of claim 25 , wherein the logic is to select the second low power state as the operating state if a projected idleness duration is less than the relative energy break-even time for the first low power state. 27. The platform of claim 26 , wherein the projected idleness duration is to be greater than the absolute energy break-even time for the first low power state. 28. The platform of claim 23 , wherein the logic is to, detect a first break event from a first event source, detect a second break event from a second event source, and coordinate issuance of the

Assignees

Inventors

Classifications

  • Monitoring task completion, e.g. by use of idle timers, stop commands or wait commands · CPC title

  • Power management, i.e. event-based initiation of a power-saving mode · CPC title

  • Means for saving power · CPC title

  • G06F1/3206Primary

    Monitoring of events, devices or parameters that trigger a change in power modality · CPC title

  • Monitoring remote activity, e.g. over telephone lines or network connections · CPC title

Patent family

Related publications grouped by family.

External sources

Frequently asked questions

Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.

What does patent US9292073B2 cover?
Systems and methods may provide for determining an absolute energy break-even time for a first low power state with respect to a current state of a system. A relative energy break-even time may also be determined for the first low power state with respect to a second low power state based on at least in part the absolute energy break-even time. In addition, an operating state may be selected fo…
Who is the assignee on this patent?
Wang Ren, Maciocco Christian, Tsai Jr-Shian, and 6 more
What technology area does this patent fall under?
Primary CPC classification G06F1/3206. Mapped technology areas include Physics.
When was this patent published?
Publication date Tue Mar 22 2016 00:00:00 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) (B2). Legal status and post-grant events are not shown on this page.
What related patents are in patentsdb?
We list 8 related publications on this page (citations in our corpus or others sharing the same primary CPC).