Forecast of driveline lash condition for multivariable active driveline damping control

US9290089B2 · US · B2

Patent metadata
FieldValue
Publication numberUS-9290089-B2
Application numberUS-201113094946-A
CountryUS
Kind codeB2
Filing dateApr 27, 2011
Priority dateApr 27, 2011
Publication dateMar 22, 2016
Grant dateMar 22, 2016

How to read this patent

A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.

  1. Title

    What the patent document calls the invention.

  2. Abstract

    A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.

  3. Assignees and inventors

    Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.

  4. Key dates

    Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.

  5. First independent claim

    The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.

  6. CPC / IPC classifications

    Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.

  7. Citations and related patents

    Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.

Abstract

Official abstract text for this publication.

A method to predict a driveline lash condition includes monitoring an axle torque request signal, determining a predicted axle torque request value at a lead time based upon the monitored axle torque request signal, and predicting the driveline lash condition at the lead time based upon the predicted axle torque request value indicating an upcoming zero torque condition.

First claim

Opening claim text (preview).

The invention claimed is: 1. Method to predict a driveline lash condition for a powertrain, the method comprising: monitoring a series of current axle torque request signal values; predictively determining an axle torque request value at a lead time based upon the series of current axle torque request signal values; predicting, using a controller, the driveline lash condition at the lead time based upon the predictively determined axle torque request value indicating an upcoming zero torque condition; and further comprising monitoring a current axle torque estimate signal; and determining the current axle torque estimate signal to indicate one of a positive current axle torque and a negative current axle torque; wherein, if the current axle torque estimate signal is determined to indicate the positive current axle torque, predicting the driveline lash condition at the lead time comprises: comparing the predictively determined axle torque request value to a positive torque prediction threshold value; and predicting the driveline lash condition based upon the predictively determined axle torque request value being less than the positive torque prediction threshold value; and wherein, if the current axle torque estimate signal is determined to indicate the negative current axle torque, predicting the driveline lash condition at the lead time comprises: comparing the predictively determined axle torque request value to a negative torque prediction threshold value; and predicting the driveline lash condition based upon the predictively determined axle torque request value being greater than the negative torque prediction threshold value; controlling the powertrain based upon the predicted driveline lash condition. 2. The method of claim 1 : wherein, if the current axle torque estimate signal is determined to indicate the positive current axle torque, predicting the driveline lash condition at the lead time further comprises: comparing the current axle torque estimate signal to a range defined by a positive minimum torque threshold value and a positive maximum torque threshold value; comparing the current axle torque request signal values to a positive torque request threshold value; and predicting the driveline lash condition further based upon the current axle torque estimate signal being within the range defined by the positive minimum torque threshold value and the positive maximum torque threshold value and the current axle torque request signal values being less than the positive torque request threshold value; and wherein, if the current axle torque estimate signal is determined to indicate the negative current axle torque, predicting the driveline lash condition at the lead time further comprises: comparing the current axle torque estimate signal to a range defined by a negative minimum torque threshold value and a negative maximum torque threshold value; comparing the current axle torque request signal values to a negative torque request threshold value; and predicting the driveline lash condition further based upon the current axle torque estimate signal being within the range defined by the negative minimum torque threshold value and the negative maximum torque threshold value and the current axle torque request signal values being greater than the negative torque request threshold value. 3. The method of claim 1 , wherein predictively determining the axle torque request value at the lead time comprises: utilizing a first-order prediction based upon a plurality of values of the current axle torque request signal values to linearly predict the axle torque request value at the lead time. 4. The method of claim 1 , wherein predictively determining the axle torque request value at the lead time comprises: filtering the current axle torque request signal values to generate a filtered axle torque request signal; and utilizing a first-order prediction based upon a plurality of values of the filtered axle torque request signal to linearly predict the axle torque request value at the lead time. 5. The method of claim 1 , wherein predictively determining the axle torque request value at the lead time comprises: utilizing a second-order prediction based upon at least three values of the current axle torque request signal values to non-linearly predict the axle torque request value at the lead time. 6. The method of claim 1 , wherein predictively determining the axle torque request value at the lead time comprises: filtering the current axle torque request signal values to generate a filtered axle torque request signal; and utilizing a second-order prediction based upon at least three values of the filtered axle torque request signal to non-linearly predict the axle torque request value at the lead time. 7. The method of claim 1 , wherein predicting the driveline lash condition at the lead time based upon the predictively determined axle torque request value indicating the upcoming zero torque condition comprises: predicting the driveline lash condition based upon comparing the predictively determined axle torque request value to a torque prediction threshold value. 8. The method of claim 7 , further comprising: monitoring a current axle torque estimate signal; and wherein predicting the driveline lash condition is further based upon the current axle torque estimate signal being within a low axle torque estimate range. 9. The method of claim 8 , wherein predicting the driveline lash condition is further based upon comparing the monitored current axle torque request signal values to a torque request threshold value. 10. The method of claim 7 , wherein predicting the driveline lash condition is further based upon comparing the monitored current axle torque request signal values to a torque request threshold value. 11. The method of claim 1 , wherein controlling the powertrain based upon the predicted driveline lash condition comprises commanding corrective measures to mitigate effect of the predicted driveline lash condition. 12. The method of claim 11 , further comprising: monitoring a current axle torque estimate signal; and ceasing commanding the corrective measures based upon a lash condition time span exceeding a minimum lash hold time and the current axle torque estimate signal exceeding a recovery axle torque estimate threshold. 13. Method to predict a vehicle driveline lash condition, the method comprising: monitoring a current axle torque estimate signal; monitoring a series of current axle torque request signal values; filtering the current axle torque request signal values to generate a filtered axle torque request signal; predictively determining a first axle torque request value at a first lead time using two values of the filtered axle torque request signal to determine a real-time linearly predicted axle torque request value; predictively determining a second axle torque request value at a second lead time using three values of the filtered axle torque request signal to determine a real-time non-linearly predicted axle torque request value; predicting the driveline lash condition based upon the current axle torque estimate signal being within a low axle torque estimate range, the current axle torque request signal values being less than a torque request threshold value, and one of the first and second predictively determined axle torque request values being less than a torque prediction threshold value; commanding, using a controller, corrective measures based upon predicting the driveline lash condition; and ceasing the corrective measures based upon a lash condition time span exceeding a min

Assignees

Inventors

Classifications

  • related to parameters of the vehicle itself {, e.g. tyre models} · CPC title

  • B60K6/365Primary

    with the gears having orbital motion · CPC title

  • Output torque change rate · CPC title

  • Differential gearing distribution type · CPC title

  • Data processing systems or methods, management, administration · CPC title

Patent family

Related publications grouped by family.

External sources

Frequently asked questions

Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.

What does patent US9290089B2 cover?
A method to predict a driveline lash condition includes monitoring an axle torque request signal, determining a predicted axle torque request value at a lead time based upon the monitored axle torque request signal, and predicting the driveline lash condition at the lead time based upon the predicted axle torque request value indicating an upcoming zero torque condition.
Who is the assignee on this patent?
Xia Houchun, Morris Robert L, Gm Global Tech Operations Inc
What technology area does this patent fall under?
Primary CPC classification B60K6/365. Mapped technology areas include Operations & Transport.
When was this patent published?
Publication date Tue Mar 22 2016 00:00:00 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) (B2). Legal status and post-grant events are not shown on this page.
What related patents are in patentsdb?
We list 8 related publications on this page (citations in our corpus or others sharing the same primary CPC).