Traffic splitting based on latency between cells

Patent metadata

Field	Value
Publication number	US-9288734-B2
Application number	US-201314137243-A
Country	US
Kind code	B2
Filing date	Dec 20, 2013
Priority date	Jun 7, 2013
Publication date	Mar 15, 2016
Grant date	Mar 15, 2016

Abstract

Systems and techniques for traffic splitting based on latency between cells are herein described. At an eNodeB, a transmission path latency for a portion of a transmission path between the eNodeB and a user equipment (UE) may be measured via a secondary eNodeB when the UE is dually connected to both the eNodeB and the secondary eNodeB. The transmission path latency may be compared to a threshold. A layer in a transmission stack to split traffic to the UE may be determined based on the comparison of the transmission path latency to the threshold, the traffic being split between the eNodeB and the secondary eNodeB.

First claim

What is claimed is:

1. An eNodeB for traffic splitting based on latency between cells, the eNodeB comprising:
a latency testing module to measure a transmission path latency for a portion of a transmission path between the eNodeB and a user equipment (UE) via a secondary eNodeB when the UE is dually connected to both the eNodeB and the secondary eNodeB;
a latency calculation module to compare the transmission path latency to a threshold, wherein to compare the transmission path latency to the threshold includes a determination that the transmission path latency is greater than the threshold; and
a traffic splitting module to determine a layer in a transmission stack to split traffic to the UE based on the comparison of the transmission path latency to the threshold, the traffic being split between the eNodeB and the secondary eNodeB, wherein the layer of the transmission stack is either a packet data convergence protocol (PDCP) layer or a radio link control (RLC) layer, and wherein to determine the layer in the transmission stack includes a selection of the PDCP layer.

2. The eNodeB of claim 1 , wherein to measure the transmission path latency includes the latency testing module to:
send a ping message over the portion of the transmission path; and
receive a response to the ping message.

3. The eNodeB of claim 2 , wherein the response to the ping message includes a calculated latency by an end-point-recipient.

4. The eNodeB of claim 3 , wherein the end-point-recipient is the UE.

5. The eNodeB of claim 3 , wherein the end-point-recipient is the secondary eNodeB.

6. The eNodeB of claim 2 , wherein the ping message is a PDCP packet with a start time stamp.

7. The eNodeB of claim 1 , wherein the eNodeB is the termination of an S1-U interface from a service gateway (S-GW) of a third generation partnership project (3GPP) long term evolution (LTE) family of standards compliant cellular network.

8. The eNodeB of claim 1 , comprising a adaption module to periodically invoke the latency testing module, the latency calculation module, and the traffic splitting module.

9. A method performed by an eNodeB for traffic splitting based on latency between cells, the method comprising:
measuring a transmission path latency for a portion of a transmission path between the eNodeB and a user equipment (UE) via a secondary eNodeB when the UE is dually connected to both the eNodeB and the secondary eNodeB;
comparing the transmission path latency to a threshold, wherein comparing the transmission path latency to the threshold includes determining that the transmission path latency is greater than the threshold; and
determining a layer in a transmission stack to split traffic to the UE based on the comparison of the transmission path latency to the threshold, the traffic being split between the eNodeB and the secondary eNodeB, wherein the layer of the transmission stack is either a packet data convergence protocol (PDCP) layer or a radio link control (RLC) layer, and wherein determining the layer in the transmission stack includes selecting the PDCP layer.

10. The method of claim 9 , wherein measuring the transmission path latency includes:
sending a ping message over the portion of the transmission path; and
receiving a response to the ping message.

11. The method of claim 10 , wherein the response to the ping message includes a calculated latency by an end-point-recipient.

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein the end-point-recipient is the UE.

13. The method of claim 11 , wherein the end-point-recipient is the secondary eNodeB.

14. The method of claim 9 , wherein the eNodeB is the termination of an S1-U interface from a service gateway (S-GW) of a third generation partnership project (3GPP) long term evolution (LTE) family of standards compliant cellular network.

15. At least one non-transitory machine readable medium including instructions that, when executed by an eNodeB, cause the eNodeB to perform operations for traffic splitting based on latency between cells, the operations comprising:
measuring a transmission path latency for a portion of a transmission path between the eNodeB and a user equipment (UE) via a secondary eNodeB when the UE is dually connected to both the eNodeB and the secondary eNodeB;
comparing the transmission path latency to a threshold, wherein comparing the transmission path latency to the threshold includes determining that the transmission path latency is greater than the threshold; and
determining a layer in a transmission stack to split traffic to the UE based on the comparison of the transmission path latency to the threshold, the traffic being split between the eNodeB and the secondary eNodeB, wherein the layer of the transmission stack is either a packet data convergence protocol (PDCP) layer or a radio link control (RLC) layer, and wherein determining the layer in the transmission stack includes selecting the PDCP layer.

16. The at least one non-transitory machine readable medium of claim 15 , wherein measuring the transmission path latency includes: sending a ping message over the portion of the transmission path; and receiving a response to the ping message.

17. The at least one non-transitory machine readable medium of claim 16 , wherein the response to the ping message includes a calculated latency by an end-point-recipient.

18. The at least one non-transitory machine readable medium of claim 17 , wherein the end-point-recipient is the UE.

19. The at least one non-transitory machine readable medium of claim 17 , wherein the end-point-recipient is the secondary eNodeB.

20. The at least one non-transitory machine readable medium of claim 16 , wherein the ping message is a PDCP packet with a start time stamp.

21. The at least one non-transitory machine readable medium of claim 15 , wherein the eNodeB is the termination of an S1-U interface from a service gateway (S-GW) of a third generation partnership project (3GPP) long term evolution (LTE) family of standards compliant cellular network.

Assignees

• Intel Corp

Inventors

• Jha Satish Chandra
• Gupta Maruti
• Koc Ali
• Vannithamby Rath

Classifications

• H04L5/0035 Primary

  Resource allocation in a cooperative multipoint environment · CPC title

• H04W8/005

  Discovery of network devices, e.g. terminals · CPC title

• H04W72/30

  Resource management for broadcast services · CPC title

• H04W72/20

  Control channels or signalling for resource management · CPC title

• H04L5/0055

  Physical resource allocation for ACK/NACK (for physical mapping arrangements in ARQ protocols H04L1/1861) · CPC title