Potentiometer degradation evaluating method

US9255951B2 · US · B2

Patent metadata
FieldValue
Publication numberUS-9255951-B2
Application numberUS-201313785562-A
CountryUS
Kind codeB2
Filing dateMar 5, 2013
Priority dateMar 5, 2012
Publication dateFeb 9, 2016
Grant dateFeb 9, 2016

How to read this patent

A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.

  1. Title

    What the patent document calls the invention.

  2. Abstract

    A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.

  3. Assignees and inventors

    Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.

  4. Key dates

    Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.

  5. First independent claim

    The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.

  6. CPC / IPC classifications

    Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.

  7. Citations and related patents

    Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.

Abstract

Official abstract text for this publication.

In a method for evaluating degradation of a potentiometer, a plurality of evaluation items, from minor to major, are established as evaluation items for degradation in performance prior to failure of a potentiometer. The degradation of the potentiometer in performance of the plurality of evaluation items is evaluated in terms of stages, in a specific sequence.

First claim

Opening claim text (preview).

The invention claimed is: 1. A method for evaluating degradation of a potentiometer in stages using an potentiometer degradation evaluating device, wherein the potentiometer is linked to a motor, the method comprising: providing the potentiometer degradation evaluating device that performs a plurality of evaluation items as evaluation items for degradation in performance prior to failure of a potentiometer; and evaluating, by the potentiometer degradation evaluating device, the degradation of performance of each of the plurality of evaluation items, in terms of stages, in a specific sequence from the evaluation item on a minor degradation to the evaluation item on a major degradation, the plurality of evaluation items including at least an evaluation of an increase in a rotational torque of a potentiometer axis, wherein the evaluating step includes the step of further evaluating whether a load torque of the potentiometer alone is increased over a threshold value when the load torque is a factor of an angular acceleration of the motor. 2. The method for evaluating degradation of a potentiometer as set forth in claim 1 , wherein a production of noise is evaluated as the evaluation item for the degradation of performance of the potentiometer, and when the production of noise is recognized, a loss of linearity between an input and an output is evaluated, when the loss of linearity is recognized, a change in a resistance value is evaluated, and when the change in the resistance value is recognized, the increase in the rotational torque of the potentiometer axis is evaluated. 3. The method for evaluating degradation of a potentiometer as set forth in claim 1 , wherein a production of noise is evaluated as the evaluation item for the degradation of performance of the potentiometer, and when the production of noise is recognized, a loss of linearity between an input and an output is evaluated. 4. The method for evaluating degradation of a potentiometer as set forth in claim 1 , wherein a loss of linearity between an input and an output is evaluated as the evaluation item for the degradation of performance of the potentiometer, and when the loss of linearity is recognized, a change in a resistance value is evaluated. 5. The method for evaluating degradation of a potentiometer as set forth in claim 1 , wherein: a change in a resistance value is evaluated as the evaluation item for the degradation of performance of the potentiometer, and when the change in the resistance value is recognized, the rotational torque of the potentiometer axis is evaluated. 6. The method for evaluating degradation of a potentiometer as set forth in claim 1 , wherein the load torque is calculated by multiplying an inertia of the potentiometer by a difference between the angular acceleration in the transient state when the motor is driven while the potentiometer removed from a device having the motor, and the angular acceleration in the transient state when the motor is driven while the potentiometer is assembled into the device.

Assignees

Inventors

Classifications

  • Testing of electric apparatus, lines, cables or components for short-circuits, continuity, leakage current or incorrect line connections (testing of sparking plugs H01T13/58) · CPC title

  • Testing or calibrating of apparatus covered by the other groups of this subclass · CPC title

  • by relative movement of a point of contact {or actuation} and a resistive track · CPC title

  • Testing of circuits in sensor or actuator systems (testing of apparatus for measuring electric or magnetic variables G01R35/00; testing of indicating or recording apparatus G01D; in airbag systems B60R21/0173; checking gas analysers G01N33/007; monitoring or fail-safe circuits for electromagnets H01F7/1844) · CPC title

  • Physics · mapped topic

Patent family

Related publications grouped by family.

External sources

Frequently asked questions

Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.

What does patent US9255951B2 cover?
In a method for evaluating degradation of a potentiometer, a plurality of evaluation items, from minor to major, are established as evaluation items for degradation in performance prior to failure of a potentiometer. The degradation of the potentiometer in performance of the plurality of evaluation items is evaluated in terms of stages, in a specific sequence.
Who is the assignee on this patent?
Azbil Corp
What technology area does this patent fall under?
Primary CPC classification G01R31/2829. Mapped technology areas include Physics.
When was this patent published?
Publication date Tue Feb 09 2016 00:00:00 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) (B2). Legal status and post-grant events are not shown on this page.
What related patents are in patentsdb?
We list 8 related publications on this page (citations in our corpus or others sharing the same primary CPC).