Handling a query from a requestor by a digital assistant where results include a data portion restricted for the requestor
US-12182205-B2 · Dec 31, 2024 · US
US9229685B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9229685-B2 |
| Application number | US-201213599320-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Aug 30, 2012 |
| Priority date | Jan 30, 2012 |
| Publication date | Jan 5, 2016 |
| Grant date | Jan 5, 2016 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Methods and arrangements for conducting corruption analysis of service designs. A service design is accepted. Corrupting factors within the service design are assessed, and a corruption susceptibility score is generated. An alternative service design is generated responsive to a corruption susceptibility score fulfilling predetermined criteria.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A method comprising: utilizing at least one processor to execute computer code configured to perform the steps of: accepting a service design related to at least one human-provided service, wherein the service design is expressed formally as a business process workflow, and design elements based on a service ontology; automatically assessing human-related corrupting factors within the service design via consulting a corruption pattern database which stores pre-defined corruption patterns in structured format, and inspecting the service design for pre-defined corruption patterns from the database; automatically generating a corruption susceptibility score based on the assessed corrupting factors, the corruption susceptibility score indicating a level of human-related corruptibility in the service design; the corruption susceptibility score being a function of at least a quantitative component relating to verifiability of identification criteria; and automatically generating an alternative service design, wherein said generating is triggered based on a threshold corruption susceptibility score. 2. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising developing corrective suggestions for developing subsequent service designs. 3. The method according to claim 1 , wherein said generating of an alternative service design comprises consulting a historical database to incorporate learning from prior corrective measures stored in the historical database. 4. The method according to claim 3 , wherein said consulting comprises accessing service design components contributing to a compliant corruption susceptibility score. 5. The method according to claim 3 , wherein said generating of an alternative service design further comprises consulting the corruption pattern database. 6. The method according to claim 1 , wherein said generating of an alternative service design comprises consulting the corruption pattern database. 7. The method according to claim 1 , wherein said assessing comprises consulting a policy database. 8. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the corruption susceptibility score includes a component of categorizing beneficiaries of a service. 9. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the corruption susceptibility score includes a component of categorizing a mode of targeting a service to beneficiaries.
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.