Control system and control method
US-2024103495-A1 · Mar 28, 2024 · US
US9134707B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9134707-B2 |
| Application number | US-201213715116-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Dec 14, 2012 |
| Priority date | Mar 30, 2012 |
| Publication date | Sep 15, 2015 |
| Grant date | Sep 15, 2015 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Various embodiments are disclosed for optimal online adaptive control. One such method includes a cost function determination by a critic network coupled to the system under control. The cost function is one produces a minimum value for a cost of the system under control when applied by an action network. The method also includes a control input determination by an action network. The control input determination uses the cost function to determine a control input to apply to the system under control. The control input is one that produces the minimum value for the cost of the system under control. The method also includes simultaneously tuning respective parameters of the critic network and the action network by applying respective tuning laws that do not involve the system dynamics function f(x) for the system under test.
Opening claim text (preview).
Therefore, the following is claimed: 1. A method of adaptively controlling a continuous-time system under control, the continuous-time system under control being described by a system dynamics function f(x), the method comprising: in a critic network coupled to the continuous-time system under control, determining a cost function that produces a minimum value for a cost of the continuous-time system under control when applied by an action network; in the action network also coupled to the continuous-time system under control, determining, using the cost function, a control input to apply to the continuous-time system under control that produces the minimum value for the cost of the continuous-time system under control; and tuning respective parameters of the critic network and the action network together and continuously in time by applying respective tuning laws that do not involve the system dynamics function f(x). 2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the tuning laws use an integral reinforcement learning (IRL) form of a Bellman equation. 3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the only data obtained from the continuous-time system under test that is used during the tuning is measured input/output data from the continuous-time system under test. 4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the tuning law for the critic network is given by W ^ . 1 = - a 1 Δ ϕ ( x ( t ) ) T ( 1 + Δ ϕ ( x ( t ) ) T Δ ϕ ( x ( t ) ) ) 2 [ ∫ t - T t ( Q ( x ) + u T Ru ) ⅆ τ + Δ ϕ ( x ( t ) ) T W ^ 1 ]
Feedforward networks · CPC title
Reinforcement learning · CPC title
Abduction · CPC title
Physics · mapped topic
electric · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.