Aggregated adaptive bit rate streaming
US-2024422108-A1 · Dec 19, 2024 · US
US9112948B1 · US · B1
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9112948-B1 |
| Application number | US-201113051886-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B1 |
| Filing date | Mar 18, 2011 |
| Priority date | Mar 18, 2011 |
| Publication date | Aug 18, 2015 |
| Grant date | Aug 18, 2015 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Various embodiments of a system and method for assignment and switching of content sources for a streaming content session are described. Embodiments may include the generation and use of content source rankings for improving playback quality of content streams. In embodiments, a merchant system may collect and aggregate multiple quality metrics for different content streams that various content sources provide to various clients. The merchant system may utilize the quality metrics to generate rankings of content sources for clients. The merchant system may provide such rankings to clients to improve the content stream playback experience on the client. For instance, at content acquisition time, a client may request a content stream from a content resource ranked highest on a content source ranking provided by the merchant. If the content stream degrades, the client may source subsequent portions of the content stream from another highly ranked content source of the ranking.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A system, comprising: one or more memories; and one or more processors coupled to the one or more memories, wherein the one or more memories comprise program instructions executable by the one or more processors to: receive, at a computer system from a plurality of remotely-located clients, wherein the computer system is separate from the plurality of remotely-located clients, quality metrics for a plurality of streaming content sessions, each streaming content session including the streaming of electronic content from a content source of a plurality of content sources to a remotely-located client of the plurality of remotely-located clients, each quality metric indicating a measure of quality associated with playback of the streamed content, wherein the computer system is separate from the plurality of content sources; and for a particular remotely-located client of the plurality of remotely-located clients, wherein the remotely-located client is to participate in a given streaming content session: identify a particular subset of quality metrics, of the quality metrics received from the plurality of remotely-located clients, which are associated with at least one property of the particular remotely-located client; generate, at the computer system separate from the plurality of remotely-located clients and the plurality of content sources, a ranking of content sources based on the particular subset of quality metrics, wherein a given ranking specifies multiple content sources each ranked on expected quality of a streaming content session between the content source and the particular remotely-located client; and provide the generated ranking of content sources, from the computer system separate from the plurality of remotely-located clients and the plurality of content sources, to the particular remotely-located client for use in selecting a content source for the given streaming content session. 2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the program instructions are configured to: based on at least some of the quality metrics, determining two or more content sources of said multiple content sources meet requisite quality standards, and within said ranking, rank a first content source of the content sources meeting the requisite quality standards higher than a second content source meeting the requisite quality standards as a result of the first content source having a content delivery cost less than a content delivery cost of the second content source. 3. The system of claim 1 , wherein one or more of said content sources include a content delivery network (CDN) configured to provide streaming content to multiple geographically-dispersed clients. 4. The system of claim 1 , wherein the quality metrics used to generate said ranking comprise quality metrics specific to the particular remotely-located client for which the ranking is generated and aggregate quality metrics received from a plurality of other remotely-located clients. 5. The system of claim 4 , wherein the ranking is generated based on a weighting of metrics, wherein at least some of the quality metrics specific to the particular remotely-located client are weighted more heavily within said weighting than at least some of the aggregate quality metrics. 6. The system of claim 1 , wherein the at least one property includes at least one of a particular geographic area or a particular internet service provider (ISP). 7. The system of claim 1 , wherein quality metrics for a given streaming content session include one or more of: a reliability metric indicating whether a playback failure occurred during the content session, a rebuffering metric indicating whether a content stream was rebuffered one or more times during content playback, or a video quality metric indicating whether a content stream was played back at a requisite resolution. 8. The system of claim 1 , wherein the program instructions are configured to provide a notification to the particular remotely-located client specifying one or more of said content sources are experiencing a service outage, wherein said one or more content sources are unavailable to stream content during the service outage. 9. The system of claim 1 , wherein the program instructions are configured to: generate an updated ranking of content sources based on one or more of the quality metrics, and during the given streaming content session, provide the particular remotely-located client with the updated ranking for use in selecting a content source for the given streaming content session. 10. A computer implemented method, comprising: receiving, at a computer system from a plurality of clients, wherein the computer system is separate from the plurality of clients, quality metrics for a plurality of streaming content sessions, each streaming content session including the streaming of electronic content from a content source of a plurality of content sources to a client of the plurality of clients, each quality metric indicating a measure of quality associated with playback of the streamed content, wherein the computer system is separate from the plurality of content sources; for a particular client of the plurality of clients, wherein the particular client is to participate in a given streaming content session: identifying a particular subset of quality metrics, of the quality metrics received from the plurality of clients, which are associated with at least one property of the particular client; generating, at the computer system separate from the plurality of clients and the plurality of content sources, a ranking of content sources based on the particular subset quality metrics, wherein a given ranking specifies multiple content sources each ranked on expected quality of a streaming content session between the content source and the particular client; and providing the generated ranking of content sources from the computer system separate from the plurality of clients and the plurality of content sources to the client for use in selecting a content source for the given streaming content session. 11. The method of claim 10 , wherein the method comprises, in addition to said at least some of the quality metrics, generating the ranking based on content delivery costs associated with content sources of the plurality of content sources. 12. The method of claim 11 , wherein the method comprises: based on at least some of the quality metrics, determining two or more content sources of said multiple content sources meet requisite quality standards, and within said ranking, ranking a first content source of the content sources meeting the requisite quality standards higher than a second content source meeting the requisite quality standards as a result of the first content source having a content delivery cost less than a content delivery cost of the second content source. 13. The method of claim 10 , wherein one or more of said content sources include a content delivery network (CDN) configured to provide streaming content to multiple geographically-dispersed clients. 14. The method of claim 10 , wherein said plurality of clients includes one or more of: a computer configured to play a content stream with a playback application, an electronic set top box configured to playback a content stream, or a mobile device configured to playback a content stream. 15. The method of claim 10 , wherein the at least one property includes at least one of a particular geographic area or a particular internet service provider (ISP). 16. The method of claim 10 , wherein quality metrics for a given stream
adapting media to network capabilities · CPC title
Media network packet handling · CPC title
Responding to QoS · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.