Method and apparatus for managing recommendation models
US-9218605-B2 · Dec 22, 2015 · US
US9104982B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9104982-B2 |
| Application number | US-201313840381-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Mar 15, 2013 |
| Priority date | Mar 15, 2013 |
| Publication date | Aug 11, 2015 |
| Grant date | Aug 11, 2015 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
The specification relates to a client device utilizing an unintentional-selection module that disambiguates selection events for temporally proximate content. The client device records time stamps indicating a time a dynamic list is first presented and instances when the dynamic list is updated. An input selection indicating that a suggested search query has been chosen from the dynamic list of search suggestions is received and a time stamp for the input selection is recorded. A determination is made to see if the input selection is an unintentional selection. The input selection is determined as the unintentional selection when a difference between a time stamp for presenting a most recent dynamic list update and the time stamp of the input selection satisfies a user-specific threshold. The user-specific threshold is calculated with a machine learning system using user-specific latency times as training data.
Opening claim text (preview).
The invention claimed is: 1. A method comprising the steps of: recording time stamps indicating a time a dynamic list of search suggestions is first presented and instances when the dynamic list is updated; receiving an input selection, the input selection indicating that a suggested search query has been chosen from the dynamic list of search suggestions; recording a time stamp for the input selection; and determining whether or not the input selection is an invalid selection, the input selection being determined as the invalid selection whenever a difference between a time stamp for presenting a most recent dynamic list update and the time stamp of the input selection satisfies a user-specific threshold, the user-specific threshold being calculated with a machine learning system trained using user-specific latency times as training data, wherein each user-specific latency time is a difference between a time stamp of a respective previous most recent dynamic list update before a respective corresponding input selection and a time stamp of the respective corresponding user input selection. 2. The method of claim 1 further comprising the step of: if the selection was invalid, replacing the suggested search query with a previously suggested search query. 3. The method of claim 1 wherein the user-specific threshold is calculated using device-specific latency times as training data. 4. The method of claim 1 further comprising the step of: if the selection is indeterminable, presenting the suggested search query and a previously suggested search query. 5. The method of claim 1 wherein the user-specific threshold is a function of time versus a probability of being invalid. 6. A system comprising: one or more processors; one or more non-transitory computer-readable storage mediums containing instructions configured to cause the one or more processors to perform operations including: recording time stamps indicating a time a dynamic list of search suggestions is first presented and instances when the dynamic list is updated; receiving an input selection, the input selection indicating that a suggested search query has been chosen from the dynamic list of search suggestions; recording a time stamp for the input selection; and determining whether or not the input selection is an invalid selection, the input selection being determined as the invalid selection whenever a difference between a time stamp for presenting a most recent dynamic list update and the time stamp of the input selection satisfies a user-specific threshold, the user-specific threshold being calculated with a machine learning system trained using user-specific latency times as training data, wherein each user-specific latency time is a difference between a time stamp of a respective previous most recent dynamic list update before a respective corresponding input selection and a time stamp of the respective corresponding user input selection. 7. The system of claim 6 including the step of: if the selection was invalid, replacing the suggested search query with a previously suggested search query. 8. The system of claim 6 wherein the user-specific threshold is calculated using device-specific latency times as training data. 9. The system of claim 6 including the step of: if the selection is indeterminable, presenting the suggested search query and a previously suggested search query. 10. The system of claim 6 wherein the user-specific threshold is a function of time versus a probability of being invalid. 11. A computer-program product, the product tangibly embodied in a non-transitory machine-readable storage medium, including instructions configured to cause a data processing apparatus to: record time stamps indicating a time a dynamic list of search suggestions is first presented and instances when the dynamic list is updated; receive an input selection, the input selection indicating that a suggested search query has been chosen from the dynamic list of search suggestions; record a time stamp for the input selection; and determine whether or not the input selection is an invalid selection, the input selection being determined as the invalid selection whenever a difference between a time stamp for presenting a most recent dynamic list update and the time stamp of the input selection satisfies a user-specific threshold, the user-specific threshold being calculated with a machine learning system trained using user-specific latency times as training data, wherein each user-specific latency time is a difference between a time stamp of a respective previous most recent dynamic list update before a respective corresponding input selection and a time stamp of the respective corresponding user input selection. 12. The computer-program product of claim 11 , further including instructions configured to cause a data processing apparatus to: if the selection was invalid, replace the suggested search query with a previously suggested search query. 13. The computer-program product of claim 11 wherein the user-specific threshold is calculated using device-specific latency times as training data. 14. The computer-program product of claim 11 , further including instructions configured to cause a data processing apparatus to: if the selection is indeterminable, present the suggested search query and a previously suggested search query. 15. A method comprising the steps of: establishing a user profile in connection with a specific client device; receiving a plurality of time stamps indicating times between updates for every dynamic list of search suggestions as received by the specific client device; receiving a plurality of time stamps indicating each time a link is chosen from the dynamic list of search suggestions; receiving a plurality of time stamps indicating each time an action signifying an invalid selection is performed after the link is chosen from the dynamic list of search suggestions; using a computer-implemented learning system to determine a user-specific threshold for an invalid selection, the user-specific threshold for the invalid selection being a function of time versus a probability of being invalid, the function of time being a difference between a time stamp for presenting a most recent dynamic list update and a time stamp for an input selecting a search suggestion, the input being invalid when the difference satisfies the user-specific threshold; establishing an invalid-selection module based upon attributes learned by the system, the module determining a probability a selection is invalid; and sending the invalid-selection module to the specific client device. 16. The method of claim 15 further comprising the step of: receiving at least one of a user's age, a type of device, a type of connection, a network carrier, a user location, and a signal strength. 17. A system comprising: one or more processors; one or more non-transitory computer-readable storage mediums containing instructions configured to cause the one or more processors to perform operations including: establishing a user profile in connection with a specific client device; receiving a plurality of time stamps indicating times between updates for every dynamic list of search suggestions as received by the specific client device; receiving a plurality of time stamps indicating each time a link is chosen from the dynamic list of search suggestions; receiving a plurality of time stamps indicating each time an action signifying an invalid selection is performed after the link is chosen from the dynami
Physics · mapped topic
Machine learning · CPC title
Indexing; Web crawling techniques · CPC title
Temporal data queries · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.