Static analysis of computer code to determine impact of change to a code component upon a dependent code component

US9032376B2 · US · B2

Patent metadata
FieldValue
Publication numberUS-9032376-B2
Application numberUS-201314037576-A
CountryUS
Kind codeB2
Filing dateSep 26, 2013
Priority dateSep 28, 2012
Publication dateMay 12, 2015
Grant dateMay 12, 2015

How to read this patent

A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.

  1. Title

    What the patent document calls the invention.

  2. Abstract

    A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.

  3. Assignees and inventors

    Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.

  4. Key dates

    Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.

  5. First independent claim

    The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.

  6. CPC / IPC classifications

    Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.

  7. Citations and related patents

    Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.

Abstract

Official abstract text for this publication.

A method is provided to evaluate impact of a change in code of a depended upon component of a system stored in a computer readable storage device, upon a dependent component of the system, the method comprising: identifying a dependency relationship between a first component stored in a computer readable storage device and a second component stored in the computer readable storage device; in response to a determination that the second component depends upon the first component, configuring a computer system to obtain a first property evaluation corresponding to the first component; and in response to obtaining the first property evaluation corresponding to the first component, configuring the computer system to associate the first property evaluation with the second component, and obtain a second property evaluation corresponding to the second component, wherein the second component is associated with the first property evaluation.

First claim

Opening claim text (preview).

The invention claimed is: 1. A method to evaluate impact of a change in code of a depended upon component of a system stored in a computer readable storage device, upon a dependent component of the system, comprising: providing in a computer readable storage device a first property evaluation summary structure that associates multiple respective property evaluations with a first version of a first component of the system; providing in a computer readable storage device a second property evaluation summary structure that associates multiple respective property evaluations with a second version of the first component of the system; providing in a computer readable storage device a third property evaluation summary structure that associates multiple respective property evaluations with a first version of a second component of the system; providing in a computer readable storage device a fourth property evaluation summary structure that associates multiple respective property evaluations with a second version of the second component of the system; comparing, by a processor, respective property evaluations within the first property evaluation summary structure with corresponding property evaluations within the second property evaluation summary structure; and comparing, by a processor, respective property evaluations within the third property evaluation summary structure with corresponding property evaluations within the fourth property evaluation summary structure; wherein the first component of the system is dependent upon the second component of the system, and wherein the computer readable storage device does not consist of transitory, propagating signals. 2. The method of claim 1 , wherein each of the first, second, third and fourth property evaluation summary structures contains the same kinds of property evaluations. 3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the respective property evaluations within the respective first and second property evaluation summary structures are associated with the same respective function. 4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the respective property evaluations within the respective first and second property evaluation summary structures are associated with the same respective first function; and wherein the respective property evaluations within the respective third and fourth property evaluation summary structures are associated with the same respective second function. 5. The method of claim 4 , wherein the first and second functions are different functions. 6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the respective property evaluations within the respective first and second property evaluation summary structures are associated with the same respective function; and wherein at least one respective property evaluation within each of the respective first and second property evaluation summary structures indicates whether the respective function returns a null pointer. 7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the respective property evaluations within the respective first and second property evaluation summary structures are associated with the same respective first function; wherein at least one respective property evaluation within each of the respective first and second property evaluation summary structures indicates whether the respective first function returns a null pointer; wherein the respective property evaluations within the respective third and fourth property evaluation summary structures are associated with the same respective second function; and wherein at least one respective property evaluation within each of the respective third and fourth property evaluation summary structures indicates whether the respective second function returns a null pointer. 8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the respective property evaluations within the respective first and second property evaluation summary structures are associated with the same respective function; and wherein at least one respective property evaluation within each of the respective first and second property evaluation summary structures indicates whether the respective function dereference its argument. 9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the respective property evaluations within the respective first and second property evaluation summary structures are associated with the same respective first function; wherein at least one respective property evaluation within each of the respective first and second property evaluation summary structures indicates whether the respective first function dereference its argument; wherein the respective property evaluations within the respective third and fourth property evaluation summary structures are associated with the same respective second function; and wherein at least one respective property evaluation within each of the respective third and fourth property evaluation summary structures indicates whether the respective second function dereference its argument. 10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the respective property evaluations within the respective first and second property evaluation summary structures are associated with the same respective function; and wherein at least one respective property evaluation within each of the respective first and second property evaluation summary structures indicates whether the respective function is a result of memory allocation operation. 11. The method of claim 1 , wherein the respective property evaluations within the respective first and second property evaluation summary structures are associated with the same respective first function; wherein at least one respective property evaluation within each of the respective first and second property evaluation summary structures indicates whether the respective first function dereference its argument; wherein the respective property evaluations within the respective third and fourth property evaluation summary structures are associated with the same respective second function; and wherein at least one respective property evaluation within each of the respective third and fourth property evaluation summary structures indicates whether the respective second function dereference its argument. 12. The method of claim 1 , wherein the respective property evaluations within the respective first and second property evaluation summary structures are associated with the same respective class definition. 13. The method of claim 1 , wherein the respective property evaluations within the respective first and second property evaluation summary structures are associated with the same respective class definition; wherein at least one respective property evaluation within each of the respective first and second property evaluation summary structures indicates a size of an instantiated class in bytes. 14. A method to evaluate impact of a change in code of a depended upon component of a system stored in a computer readable storage device, upon a dependent component of the system, comprising: identifying a dependency relationship between a first component stored in a computer readable storage device and a second component stored in the computer readable storage device; in response to a determination that the second component depends upon the first component, configuring a computer system to obtain a first property evaluation corresponding to the first component; and in response to the act of obtaining the first property evaluation corresponding to the first component, configuring the computer system to; associate the first property evaluation with the second component, and obtain a second property ev

Assignees

Inventors

Classifications

  • for test execution, e.g. scheduling of test suites · CPC title

  • by runtime analysis (performance monitoring G06F11/3466) · CPC title

  • Version control (security arrangements therefor G06F21/57); Configuration management · CPC title

  • for test version control, e.g. updating test cases to a new software version · CPC title

Patent family

Related publications grouped by family.

External sources

Frequently asked questions

Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.

What does patent US9032376B2 cover?
A method is provided to evaluate impact of a change in code of a depended upon component of a system stored in a computer readable storage device, upon a dependent component of the system, the method comprising: identifying a dependency relationship between a first component stored in a computer readable storage device and a second component stored in the computer readable storage device; in re…
Who is the assignee on this patent?
Synopsys Inc
What technology area does this patent fall under?
Primary CPC classification G06F11/3688. Mapped technology areas include Physics.
When was this patent published?
Publication date Tue May 12 2015 00:00:00 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) (B2). Legal status and post-grant events are not shown on this page.
What related patents are in patentsdb?
We list 8 related publications on this page (citations in our corpus or others sharing the same primary CPC).