Autonomous landing systems and methods for vertical landing aircraft
US-2024425197-A1 · Dec 26, 2024 · US
US8977411B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-8977411-B2 |
| Application number | US-201313901607-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | May 24, 2013 |
| Priority date | May 24, 2012 |
| Publication date | Mar 10, 2015 |
| Grant date | Mar 10, 2015 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
The present disclosure provides a computer-implemented method of generating a description of aircraft intent expressed in a formal language that provides an unambiguous description of an aircraft's intended motion and configuration during a period of flight. A description of flight intent is parsed to provide instances of flight intent, each instance of flight intent spanning a flight segment. For each flight segment, an associated flight segment description is generated that comprises one or more instances of flight intent that describe the aircraft's motion in at least one degree of freedom of motion. One or more instances of flight intent are added to flight segments to close all degrees of freedom of motion. The flight segment descriptions are collated thereby providing a description of aircraft intent for the period of flight expressed in a formal language.
Opening claim text (preview).
The invention claimed is: 1. A computer-implemented method of generating a description of aircraft intent expressed in a formal language that provides an unambiguous description of an aircraft's intended motion and configuration during a period of flight, comprising: obtaining a description of flight intent corresponding to a flight plan spanning the period of flight; ensuring that the flight intent description is parsed to provide instances of flight intent, each instance of flight intent spanning a flight segment with a plurality of flight segments together spanning the period of flight, wherein the plurality of flight segments represent an intent of changing an aircraft motion state from one state into another; for each flight segment, following a set of attributes comprising an effect, an execution interval, and a flight segment code that govern a creation of valid words, wherein the effect comprises aircraft behavior exhibited during the flight segment represented by a composite, the execution interval defines an interval during which the flight segment is active defining an initial aircraft state and a final aircraft state, and the flight segment code comprises an alphanumeric string indicating degrees of freedom of motion of the aircraft that are not closed by the composite; for each flight segment, generating an associated flight segment description that comprises at least one or more instances of flight intent, wherein each instance of the at least one or more instances of flight intent provides a description of the aircraft's motion in at least one degree of freedom of motion thereby closing the at least one degree of freedom of motion and/or provides a description of the aircraft's configuration to close at least one degree of freedom of configuration; identifying the plurality of flight segments where not all degrees of freedom are closed and completing the identified flight segments by adding one or more instances of flight intent to close all degrees of freedom; and collating flight segment descriptions thereby providing the description of aircraft intent for the period of flight expressed in the formal language to assist in flying the aircraft with the unambiguous description of the aircraft's intended motion and configuration during the period of flight. 2. The method of claim 1 , wherein adding one or more instances of flight intent comprises selecting a strategy from a plurality of stored strategies and adding an instance of flight intent corresponding to the strategy. 3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the plurality of stored strategies are identified by the degrees of freedom the plurality of stored strategies influence, and a strategy is selected to close a degree of freedom from the plurality of stored strategies identified to influence the degree of freedom. 4. The method of claim 2 , wherein the plurality of stored strategies are identified by a phase of flight to which the plurality of stored strategies apply, and a strategy is selected to close a degree of freedom from the strategies identified to influence the degree of freedom and identified to apply to the phase of flight associated with the flight segment. 5. The method of claim 2 wherein the step of adding an instance of flight intent includes providing a parameter range thereby forming a parametric aircraft intent, and the method further comprises optimizing the parametric aircraft intent by determining an optimal value for a parameter of the parameter range. 6. The method of claim 5 , wherein determining the optimal values comprises: generating initial parameter values thereby forming a model aircraft intent; calculating a trajectory from the model aircraft intent; calculating a merit function value for the trajectory using a merit function; and repeated iterations of amending the initial parameter values, calculating a resulting trajectory and calculating a resulting merit function value to determine whether the description of aircraft intent is improved, thereby optimizing the initial parameter values by improving the merit function value. 7. The method of claim 6 , comprising retrieving objectives pertaining to the period of flight and using the objectives to form the merit function; and wherein the objectives are pre-defined by operators of the aircraft and are stored in a user preferences model, the objectives representing a desire relating to a trajectory to maximize or minimize a function. 8. The method of claim 7 , further comprising for each objective following the set of attributes comprising the effect, a domain of application, and the execution interval, wherein the effect comprises a mathematical expression which defines an influence of the objective in the motion of the aircraft, the domain of the application comprises the interval where the objective is active and in which the effect is applied to the motion of the aircraft, and the execution interval indicates when the objective is considered active in a trajectory prediction process. 9. The method of claim 1 wherein the description of flight intent obtained includes a description of a set of initial conditions of the aircraft at a start of the period of flight. 10. The method of claim 1 further comprising obtaining a description of a set of initial conditions of the aircraft at a start of the period of flight and ensuring that the flight intent description and the initial conditions are parsed to provide the instances of flight intent. 11. The method of claim 1 further comprising: checking that the aircraft intent meets one or more constraints, representing a restriction on a trajectory of the aircraft, and when the aircraft intent does not meet one or more constraints pertaining to the aircraft: returning to the parsed flight intent description derived from the obtained flight intent; identifying flight segments where not all degrees of freedom are closed and completing the identified flight segments selecting an alternative strategy from the plurality of stored strategies and adding an instance of flight intent corresponding to the alternative strategy to close all degrees of freedom; collating the flight segment descriptions thereby providing an alternative description of aircraft intent for the period of flight expressed in the formal language; and repeating the step of checking that the aircraft intent meets one or more constraints pertaining to the aircraft. 12. The method of claim 11 , wherein the following the set of attributes further comprises for the one or more constraint following the set of attributes comprising the effect, a domain of application, and the execution interval, wherein the effect comprises a mathematical expression which defines an influence of the constraint on the motion of the aircraft, the domain of the application comprises an interval where the constraint is active and in which the effect is applied to the motion of the aircraft, and the execution interval indicates when the constraint is considered active in a trajectory prediction process. 13. The method of claim 1 further comprising: checking that the aircraft intent meets one or more constraints, representing a restriction on a trajectory of the aircraft, and when the aircraft intent does not meet one or more constraints pertaining to the aircraft: for the flight segments where the one or more constraints are not met, returning to the flight description derived by parsing the obtained flight intent, completing the flight segment by selecting an alternative strategy from the plurality of stored strategies and adding an instance of flight intent corresponding to the alternative strategy to close all degrees of f
from a ground station · CPC title
for approach or landing · CPC title
Transmission of traffic-related information between aircraft and ground stations · CPC title
Change initiated in response to external conditions, e.g. avoidance of elevated terrain or of no-fly zones · CPC title
Physics · mapped topic
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.