Hallucination Detection
US-2024394600-A1 · Nov 28, 2024 · US
US8954510B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-8954510-B2 |
| Application number | US-18993405-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Jul 26, 2005 |
| Priority date | Jul 26, 2005 |
| Publication date | Feb 10, 2015 |
| Grant date | Feb 10, 2015 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A method of parsing an email includes receiving an email and determining whether the email includes a response history. Based on the response history, the email is parsed. A computer usable medium including computer readable code and a system including means for accomplishing similar actions is also disclosed.
Opening claim text (preview).
We claim: 1. A method of managing a string of emails and comments added to the emails by recipients of the emails, the method comprising: receiving the string of emails; determining that the email is text format, and in response identifying one or more lines within the email that begin with a first number of symbols that is greater than a number of symbols in any subsequent line within the string of emails following the at least one line, each of the symbols indicating that a respective line is part or all of a comment to one of the emails or part or all of one of the string of emails, a lesser number of symbols indicating a more recent comment or email than a greater number of symbols; and deleting from the string all emails other than a latest email in the string and substituting respective links to the deleted emails, and deleting the comments in the lines that begin with more symbols than the first number of symbols and substituting respective links to the deleted comments. 2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein determining whether the email includes a response history comprises offering a user a manual parsing function based on a determination that the email includes a first tag configured to generate a first non-default text color that is followed by a second tag configured to generate a second non-default text color that differs from the first non-default text color. 3. A computer program product for parsing an email, the computer program product comprising: a non-transitory computer readable storage device, and computer readable program code stored on the storage device, the computer readable program code comprising: computer readable program code to receive the string of emails; computer readable program code, to determine that the email is text format, and in response to identify one or more lines within the email that begin with a first number of symbols that is greater than a number of symbols in any subsequent line within the string of emails following the at least one line, each of the symbols indicating that a respective line is part or all of a comment to one of the emails or part or all of one of the string of emails, a lesser number of symbols indicating a more recent comment or email than a greater number of symbols; and computer readable code to delete from the string all emails other than a latest email in the string and substituting respective links to the deleted emails, and deleting the comments in the lines that begin with more symbols than the first number of symbols and substituting respective links to the deleted comments. 4. The computer program product of claim 3 , wherein computer readable code for determining whether the email includes a response history comprises computer readable code for offering a user a manual parsing function based on a determination that the email includes a first tag configured to generate a first non-default text color that is followed by a second tag configured to generate a second non-default text color that differs from the first non-default text color. 5. A data processing system for parsing an email, the data processing system comprising: a bus; a memory operably connected to the bus, wherein the memory contains a set of instructions; a processor operably connected to the bus, wherein the processor executes the set of instructions to receive the string of emails to determine that the email is text format, and in response to identify one or more lines within the email that begin with a first number of symbols that is greater than a number of symbols in any subsequent line within the string of emails follow the at least one line, each of the symbols indicating that a respective line is part or all of a comment to one of the emails or part or all of one of the string of emails, a lesser number of symbols indicating a more recent comment or email than a greater number of symbols; to delete from the string all emails other than a latest email in the string and substituting respective links to the deleted emails, and deleting the comments in the lines that begin with more symbols than the first number of symbols and substituting respective links to the deleted comments. 6. The data processing system of claim 5 , wherein executing the set of instructions to determining whether the email includes a response history comprises the processor executing the set of instructions to offer a user a manual parsing function based on a determination that the email includes a first tag configured to generate a first non-default text color that is followed by a second tag configured to generate a second non-default text color that differs from the first non-default text color. 7. A computer-implemented method of parsing an email, the method comprising: receiving an email and determining that the email is markup language format; responsive to a determination that the email is markup language format, searching for at least one tag that is contained within the email and is configured to generate a first number of reply indicators that is greater than a second number of reply indicators generated by a subsequent tag that is contained within the email following the at least one tag, the at least one tag indicating of a response history; and responsive to a determination that the email includes the indication of the response history, removing the indicated response history from the email, storing the indicated response history, identifying a number of levels of the indicated response history, and inserting into the email links for the respective levels of responses to the responses in the indicated response history. 8. The computer-implemented method of claim 7 , wherein determining whether the email includes a response history comprises offering a user a manual parsing function based on a determination that the email includes a first tag configured to generate a first non-default text color that is followed by a second tag configured to generate a second non-default text color that differs from the first non-default text color.
Computer-aided management of electronic mailing [e-mailing] · CPC title
Electricity · mapped topic
Annexed information, e.g. attachments · CPC title
Mailbox-related aspects, e.g. synchronisation of mailboxes · CPC title
using filtering or selective blocking · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.