Accommodating mobile destinations for unmanned aerial vehicles
US-2017372256-A1 · Dec 28, 2017 · US
US2026099805A1 · US · A1
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-2026099805-A1 |
| Application number | US-202519343413-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | A1 |
| Filing date | Sep 29, 2025 |
| Priority date | Oct 3, 2024 |
| Publication date | Apr 9, 2026 |
| Grant date | — |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Example implementations relate to improving an accuracy of an address. A set of address element inputs are received. A quality metric based on the set of address element inputs is computed using a first machine learning model. In accordance with a determination that the quality metric does not meet a threshold, an enriched address is generated based on the set of address element inputs. Feedback indicating an outcome of a delivery associated with the enriched address is received. The first machine learning model is re-train based on the feedback.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1 . A system, comprising: a processor; and a non-transitory memory storing instructions, that when executed, cause the processor to: receive a set of address element inputs via a first interface; compute a quality metric based on the set of address element inputs using a first machine learning model; in accordance with a determination that the quality metric does not meet a threshold, generate an enriched address based on the set of address element inputs; receive feedback indicating an outcome of a delivery associated with the enriched address; and re-train the first machine learning model based on the feedback. 2 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the set of address element inputs received via the first interface comprises a textual address and the instructions that cause the processor to generate the enriched address further comprise instructions to: automatically convert the textual address into a location on a map; and display, on the map, a graphical user interface element indicative of the location. 3 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the instructions that cause the processor to generate the enriched address further comprise instructions to: automatically determine latitudinal and longitudinal coordinates of a user providing the set of address element inputs; and display an interactive graphical user interface element that allows the user to obtain a user adjusted location for the enriched address based on movement of the interactive graphical user interface element. 4 . The system of claim 3 , wherein the quality metric comprises an address quality score computed at least in part based on a numerical value of a difference in distance between the user adjusted location and the determined latitudinal and longitudinal coordinates of the user providing the set of address element inputs. 5 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the first machine learning model used to compute the quality metric computed based on the set of address element inputs comprises a machine learning model trained on delivery failure outcomes comprising one or more of cancellations, delays or non-delivery. 6 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the instructions that cause the processor to generate the enriched address further comprise instructions to generate, using a recommendation model, a set of deliverable address choices that are generated based on geocoded, reverse-geocoded or past addresses associated with the set of address element inputs that resulted in successful deliveries. 7 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the first machine learning model is trained using a data source that comprises one or more of: geocoding inputs, input from third party databases, user provided delivery instructions, data from last mile deliveries, data signals indicating an outcome of a delivery, or changes made during deliveries. 8 . A computer-implemented method, comprising: receiving a set of address element inputs via a first interface; computing a quality metric based on the set of address element inputs using a first machine learning model; in accordance with a determination that the quality metric does not meet a threshold, generating an enriched address based on the set of address element inputs; receiving feedback indicating an outcome of a delivery associated with the enriched address; and re-training the first machine learning model based on the feedback. 9 . The computer-implemented method of claim 8 , wherein the set of address element inputs received via the first interface comprises a textual address and generating the enriched address further comprises: automatically converting the textual address into a location on a map; and displaying, on the map, a graphical user interface element indicative of the location. 10 . The computer-implemented method of claim 8 , wherein generating the enriched address further comprises: automatically determining latitudinal and longitudinal coordinates of a user providing the set of address element inputs; and displaying an interactive graphical user interface element that allows the user to obtain a user adjusted location for the enriched address based on movement of the interactive graphical user interface element. 11 . The computer-implemented method of claim 10 , wherein the quality metric comprises an address quality score computed at least in part based on a numerical value of a difference in distance between the user adjusted location and the determined latitudinal and longitudinal coordinates of the user providing the set of address element inputs. 12 . The computer-implemented method of claim 8 , wherein the first machine learning model used to compute the quality metric computed based on the set of address element inputs comprises a machine learning model trained on delivery failure outcomes comprising one or more of cancellations, delays or non-delivery. 13 . The computer-implemented method of claim 8 , wherein generating the enriched address further comprises generating, using a recommendation model, a set of deliverable address choices that are generated based on geocoded, reverse-geocoded or past addresses associated with the set of address element inputs that resulted in successful deliveries. 14 . The computer-implemented method of claim 8 , wherein the first machine learning model is trained using a data source that comprises one or more of: geocoding inputs, input from third party databases, user provided delivery instructions, data from last mile deliveries, data signals indicating an outcome of a delivery, or changes made during deliveries. 15 . A non-transitory computer readable medium having instructions stored thereon, wherein the instructions, when executed by at least one processor, cause at least one device to perform operations comprising: receiving a set of address element inputs via a first interface; computing a quality metric based on the set of address element inputs using a first machine learning model; in accordance with a determination that the quality metric does not meet a threshold, generating an enriched address based on the set of address element inputs; receiving feedback indicating an outcome of a delivery associated with the enriched address; and re-training the first machine learning model based on the feedback. 16 . The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 15 , wherein the set of address element inputs received via the first interface comprises a textual address and the instructions that cause the at least one device to perform operations further comprise instructions to: automatically convert the textual address into a location on a map; and display, on the map, a graphical user interface element indicative of the location. 17 . The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 15 , wherein the instructions that cause the at least one device to perform operations further comprise instructions to: automatically determine latitudinal and longitudinal coordinates of a user providing the set of address element inputs; and display an interactive graphical user interface element that allows the user to obtain a user adjusted location for the enriched address based on movement of the interactive graphical user interface element. 18 . The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 17 , wherein the quality metric comprises an address quality score computed at least in part based on a numerical value of a difference in distance between the user adjusted location and the determined latitudinal and longitudina
Historical data · CPC title
using forecasting or optimisation · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.