Proactive incorporation of unsolicited content into human-to-computer dialogs
US-2021383809-A1 · Dec 9, 2021 · US
US2026099519A1 · US · A1
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-2026099519-A1 |
| Application number | US-202519069204-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | A1 |
| Filing date | Mar 3, 2025 |
| Priority date | Oct 4, 2024 |
| Publication date | Apr 9, 2026 |
| Grant date | — |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Systems and methods for improved data processing of communications across computer networks using trifurcated prompts during communication exchanges are described. For example, the system may receive a first inbound communication, wherein the first inbound communication system may determine a first context for the first inbound communication based on the first text string. The system may process the first context in a perturbation model to determining a first perturbed context, wherein the perturbation model determines the first perturbed context by determining a first alternative token for a first token in the first context. The system may determine a first prompt for a first large language model based on the first perturbed context.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1 . A system for improved data processing of communications across computer networks using trifurcated prompts during communication exchanges, the system comprising: one or more processors; and one or more non-transitory, computer-readable mediums comprising instructions that when executed by the one or more processors cause operations comprising: receiving, by a first server in a computer network, a first inbound communication from a second server in the computer network, wherein the first inbound communication comprises a first text string relating to a first network task, wherein the first text string comprises a plurality of tokens; determining a first context for the first inbound communication based on the first text string; processing the first context in a perturbation model to determine a first perturbed context, wherein the perturbation model determines the first perturbed context by determining a first alternative token for a first token in the first context; determining a first prompt for a first large language model, wherein the first prompt comprises a first instruction, a first question, and the first perturbed context; processing the first prompt in the first large language model to generate a first outbound communication; and determining, based on the first outbound communication, a third server for servicing the first network task. 2 . A method for improved data processing of communications across computer networks using trifurcated prompts during communication exchanges, the method comprising: receiving a first inbound communication, wherein the first inbound communication comprises a first text string; determining a first context for the first inbound communication based on the first text string; processing the first context in a perturbation model to determine a first perturbed context, wherein the perturbation model determines the first perturbed context by determining a first alternative token for a first token in the first context; determining a first prompt for a first large language model, wherein the first prompt comprises a first instruction, a first question, and the first perturbed context; and processing the first prompt in the first large language model to generate a first outbound communication. 3 . The method of claim 2 , wherein the perturbation model comprises a first model component trained on a known instruction, a known question, and a known context. 4 . The method of claim 2 , wherein the perturbation model comprises a second model component trained on a known instruction, a known question, and a known perturbed context. 5 . The method of claim 2 , wherein the perturbation model comprises a third model component trained on a known instruction and a known question, and wherein the third model component is trained without a known context or a known perturbed context. 6 . The method of claim 2 , wherein the perturbation model comprises a difference metric calculator component that compares, to a ground truth output, a first component output of a first model component, a second component output of a second model component, and a third component output of a third model component. 7 . The method of claim 2 , wherein the perturbation model comprises a confusion collator component that compares respective answer outputs from a first model component, a second model component, and a third model component. 8 . The method of claim 2 , wherein the perturbation model comprises a regression model that compares outputs from a confusion collator and a difference metric calculator. 9 . The method of claim 2 , wherein processing the first context in a perturbation model to determine a first perturbed context further comprises: receiving a model identifier for the first large language model; and selecting the perturbation model from a plurality of perturbation models based on the model identifier. 10 . The method of claim 2 , wherein determining the first alternative token for the first token in the first context further comprises: determining respective likelihoods of misidentification by the first large language model for a plurality of tokens; and determining to replace the first token with the first alternative token based on a respective likelihood of the respective likelihoods for the first token. 11 . The method of claim 2 , wherein determining the first alternative token for the first token in the first context further comprises: determining a synonym for the first token; and determining the first alternative token based on the synonym. 12 . The method of claim 2 , wherein determining the first alternative token for the first token in the first context further comprises: determining a class for the first token; and randomly selecting the first alternative token from the class. 13 . The method of claim 2 , wherein the first text string comprises a plurality of tokens, and wherein determining the first context for the first inbound communication based on the first text string further comprises: determining a word phrase based on the plurality of tokens; and processing the plurality of tokens as the word phrase to determine the first context. 14 . The method of claim 2 , wherein determining the first context for the first inbound communication based on the first text string further comprises: determining a plurality of tokens describing to the first text string; and determining the first context based on the plurality of tokens. 15 . The method of claim 2 , wherein determining the first prompt for the first large language model further comprises: determining the first instruction based on the first inbound communication; and determining the first question based on the first inbound communication. 16 . The method of claim 2 , wherein processing the first prompt in the first large language model to generate the first outbound communication further comprises: determining a network task based on the first inbound communication; and determining a network component for servicing the network task based on the first outbound communication. 17 . One or more non-transitory, computer-readable mediums, comprising instructions that, when executed by one or more processors, cause operations comprising: receiving a first inbound communication, wherein the first inbound communication comprises a first text string; determining a first context for the first inbound communication based on the first text string; processing the first context in a perturbation model to determine a first perturbed context, wherein the perturbation model determines the first perturbed context by determining a first alternative token for a first token in the first context; determining a first prompt for a first large language model based on the first perturbed context; and processing the first prompt in the first large language model to generate a first outbound communication. 18 . The one or more non-transitory, computer-readable mediums of claim 17 , wherein the perturbation model comprises a first model component trained on a known instruction, a known question, and a known context, wherein the perturbation model comprises a second model component trained on the known instruction, the known question, and a known perturbed context, wherein the perturbation model comprises a third model component trained on the known instruction and the known question, and wherein the third model component is trained without the known context or the known perturbed context.
Lexical analysis, e.g. tokenisation or collocates · CPC title
Thesauruses; Synonyms · CPC title
Distributed expert systems; Blackboards · CPC title
in dialogue systems · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.