Automated inspection system
US-2024420305-A1 · Dec 19, 2024 · US
US2026072420A1 · US · A1
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-2026072420-A1 |
| Application number | US-202418883077-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | A1 |
| Filing date | Sep 12, 2024 |
| Priority date | Sep 12, 2024 |
| Publication date | Mar 12, 2026 |
| Grant date | — |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A system for inspecting a gas turbine engine component includes an inspection environment operable to access feature information associated with a component design. The feature information includes a unique identifier assigned to a respective geometric feature of the component design. The environment is operable to access one or more inspection criterion associated with the unique identifier. The environment is operable to access process information obtained during manufacturing of a physical instance of the respective geometric feature according to one or more manufacturing parameters. The environment is operable to generate, using a machine learning model, a prediction of whether the physical instance of the respective geometric feature meets the one or more inspection criterion based on the process information. A method for inspecting a component is also disclosed.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1 . A system for inspecting a gas turbine engine component comprising: one or more processors coupled to memory, the one or more processors collectively operable to execute an inspection environment, and the inspection environment operable to: access feature information associated with a component design, the feature information including a unique identifier assigned to a respective geometric feature of the component design; access one or more inspection criterion associated with the unique identifier; access process information obtained during manufacturing of a physical instance of the respective geometric feature according to one or more manufacturing parameters; generate, using a machine learning model, a prediction of whether the physical instance of the respective geometric feature meets the one or more inspection criterion based on the process information; and generate an indicator associated with the prediction. 2 . The system as recited in claim 1 , wherein the feature information includes at least one of the following: a geometry of the geometric feature, a dimension of the geometric feature, and a tolerance associated with the dimension. 3 . The system as recited in claim 2 , wherein the one or more inspection criterion includes at least one of the following: the tolerance associated with the dimension; and one or more manufacturing acceptance criterion. 4 . The system as recited in claim 1 , wherein the inspection environment operable to: cause the one or more manufacturing parameters to be adjusted based on the prediction; and generate, using the machine learning model, a prediction of whether another physical instance of the respective geometric feature manufactured according to the adjusted one or more manufacturing parameters meets the one or more inspection criterion. 5 . The system as recited in claim 1 , wherein the inspection environment is operable to: access one or more manufacturing repositories including a manufacturing execution repository, wherein: entries in the one or more manufacturing repositories are associated with unique identifiers assigned to respective geometric features of one or more component designs to establish a set of digital threads linking the respective entries across the one or more manufacturing repositories by the respective unique identifier; the manufacturing execution repository includes one or more instructions to manufacture the respective geometric features of the one or more component designs; and the one or more manufacturing parameters include the respective one or more instructions associated with manufacture of the physical instance of the respective geometric feature; and identify an entry in the manufacturing execution repository assigned the unique identifier including the respective one or more instructions utilized to manufacture the physical instance of the respective geometric feature, wherein the prediction is based on the identified entry. 6 . The system as recited in claim 1 , wherein the machine learning model is operable to generate the prediction without any physical inspection information corresponding to the physical instance of the geometric feature. 7 . The system as recited in claim 1 , wherein the machine learning model includes a neural network. 8 . The system as recited in claim 1 , wherein: training data utilized to train the machine learning model includes the prediction associated with a prior physical instance of manufacturing the geometric feature. 9 . The system as recited in claim 1 , wherein: training data utilized to train the machine learning model includes inspection information obtained during physical inspection of the prior instance of manufacturing the geometric feature. 10 . The system as recited in claim 1 , wherein the component design is associated with a gas turbine engine component. 11 . A non-transitory computer-readable medium having computer-executable instructions that, when executed by one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to collectively execute an inspection environment operable to: access feature information associated with a component design, the feature information including a unique identifier assigned to a respective geometric feature of the component design; access one or more inspection criterion associated with the unique identifier; access process information obtained during manufacturing of a physical instance of the respective geometric feature according to one or more manufacturing parameters; generate, using a machine learning model, a prediction of whether the physical instance of the respective geometric feature meets the one or more inspection criterion based on the process information; and generate an indicator associated with the prediction. 12 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium as recited in claim 11 , wherein: the feature information includes at least one of the following: a geometry of the geometric feature, a dimension of the geometric feature, and a tolerance associated with the dimension; the one or more inspection criterion includes the tolerance associated with the dimension; and the indicator is associated with the tolerance. 13 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium as recited in claim 11 , the inspection environment is operable to: cause the one or more manufacturing parameters to be adjusted based on the prediction; and generate, using the machine learning model, a prediction of whether another physical instance of the respective geometric feature manufactured according to the adjusted one or more manufacturing parameters meets the one or more inspection criterion. 14 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium as recited in claim 11 , wherein the machine learning model includes a neural network. 15 . A method for inspecting a component comprising: accessing feature information associated with a component design including a geometric feature associated with a respective unique identifier; accessing one or more inspection criterion associated with the unique identifier; manufacturing a physical instance of the respective geometric feature of a component according to one or more manufacturing parameters; accessing process information obtained during the manufacturing that is associated with the unique identifier; generating, using machine learning, a prediction of whether the physical instance of the respective geometric feature meets the one or more inspection criterion based on the process information and/or the one or more manufacturing parameters; and accepting or rejecting the physical instance of the component based on the prediction. 16 . The method as recited in claim 15 , wherein the one or more inspection criterion include a dimension and/or a tolerance associated with the unique identifier. 17 . The method as recited in claim 15 , further comprising: accessing one or more manufacturing repositories including a manufacturing execution repository, wherein entries in the one or more manufacturing repositories are associated with unique identifiers assigned to respective geometric features of one or more component designs to establish a set of digital threads linking the respective entries across the one or more manufacturing repositories by the respective unique identifier; determining the digital thread associated with the physical instance of the respective geometric feature; and identifying an entry in the manufacturing execution repository associated with the determined digital thread, the e
Quality control · CPC title
using kernel methods, e.g. support vector machines [SVM] · CPC title
Combinations of networks · CPC title
Ensemble learning · CPC title
Backpropagation, e.g. using gradient descent · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.