Method and system for determining a temporospatially-fractionated radiotherapy planning
US-2024424320-A1 · Dec 26, 2024 · US
US2026014392A1 · US · A1
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-2026014392-A1 |
| Application number | US-202418770078-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | A1 |
| Filing date | Jul 11, 2024 |
| Priority date | Jul 11, 2024 |
| Publication date | Jan 15, 2026 |
| Grant date | — |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A control circuit accesses at least one optimization factor and optimizes a radiation treatment plan by, at least in part, automatically selecting at least one treatment field angle as a function of that at least one optimization factor as well as a redundancy cost constraint.
Opening claim text (preview).
1 . A method comprising: by a control circuit: accessing at least one optimization factor; optimizing a radiation treatment plan by, at least in part, automatically selecting at least one treatment field angle as a function of: the at least one optimization factor; and a redundancy cost constraint. 2 . The method of claim 1 wherein the at least one optimization factor corresponds to a patient's anatomical geometry. 3 . The method of claim 2 wherein the at least one optimization factor that corresponds to a patient's anatomical geometry comprises at least one metric representing, on a field-by-field basis and from a beam's eye point of view, overlap between a patient's target volume and at least one protected volume. 4 . The method of claim 2 wherein the at least one optimization factor that corresponds to a patient's anatomical geometry comprises at least one metric representing, on a field-by-field basis and from a beam's eye point of view, a quantity of voxels that are exposed to radiation. 5 . The method of claim 4 wherein the quantity of voxels comprises an average number of voxels per beamlet. 6 . The method of claim 4 wherein the quantity of voxels that are exposed to radiation comprises a quantity of voxels that are exposed to radiation by a single beamlet from amongst a plurality of beamlets that comprise a therapeutic radiation beam. 7 . The method of claim 2 wherein the at least one optimization factor that corresponds to a patient's anatomical geometry comprises at least one metric representing, on a field-by-field basis and from a beam's eye point of view, both: overlap between a patient's target volume and at least one protected volume; and a quantity of voxels that are exposed to radiation. 8 . The method of claim 1 wherein the redundancy cost constraint represents an optimization cost imposed on redundant selections of treatment field angles, such that optimization of the radiation treatment plan favors fewer of a particular treatment field angle as versus more of treatment field angles that are different from the particular treatment field angle. 9 . The method of claim 1 wherein at least one of the at least one optimization factor and the redundancy cost constraint are weighted. 10 . The method of claim 1 wherein both the at least one optimization factor and the redundancy cost constraint are weighted. 11 . An apparatus comprising: a control circuit configured to: access at least one optimization factor; and optimize a radiation treatment plan by, at least in part, automatically selecting at least one treatment field angle as a function of: the at least one optimization factor; and a redundancy cost constraint. 12 . The apparatus of claim 11 wherein the at least one optimization factor corresponds to a patient's anatomical geometry. 13 . The apparatus of claim 12 wherein the at least one optimization factor that corresponds to a patient's anatomical geometry comprises at least one metric representing, on a field-by-field basis and from a beam's eye point of view, overlap between a patient's target volume and at least one protected volume. 14 . The apparatus of claim 12 wherein the at least one optimization factor that corresponds to a patient's anatomical geometry comprises at least one metric representing, on a field-by-field basis and from a beam's eye point of view, a quantity of voxels that are exposed to radiation. 15 . The apparatus of claim 14 wherein the quantity of voxels comprises an average number of voxels per beamlet. 16 . The apparatus of claim 14 wherein the quantity of voxels that are exposed to radiation comprises a quantity of voxels that are exposed to radiation by a single beamlet from amongst a plurality of beamlets that comprise a therapeutic radiation beam. 17 . The apparatus of claim 12 wherein the at least one optimization factor that corresponds to a patient's anatomical geometry comprises at least one metric representing, on a field-by-field basis and from a beam's eye point of view, both: overlap between a patient's target volume and at least one protected volume; and a quantity of voxels that are exposed to radiation. 18 . The apparatus of claim 11 wherein the redundancy cost constraint represents an optimization cost imposed on redundant selections of treatment field angles, such that optimization of the radiation treatment plan favors more differing treatment field angles as versus fewer similar treatment field angles. 19 . The apparatus of claim 11 wherein at least one of the at least one optimization factor and the redundancy cost constraint are weighted. 20 . The apparatus of claim 11 wherein both the at least one optimization factor and the redundancy cost constraint are weighted.
using a specific method of dose optimization · CPC title
with movement of the radiation head during application of radiation, e.g. for intensity modulated arc therapy or IMAT · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.