Well plug integrity

US2025369325A1 · US · A1

Patent metadata
FieldValue
Publication numberUS-2025369325-A1
Application numberUS-202418928664-A
CountryUS
Kind codeA1
Filing dateOct 28, 2024
Priority dateMay 30, 2024
Publication dateDec 4, 2025
Grant date

How to read this patent

A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.

  1. Title

    What the patent document calls the invention.

  2. Abstract

    A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.

  3. Assignees and inventors

    Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.

  4. Key dates

    Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.

  5. First independent claim

    The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.

  6. CPC / IPC classifications

    Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.

  7. Citations and related patents

    Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.

Abstract

Official abstract text for this publication.

Some implementations include a method for predicting a plug leak in a wellbore during hydraulic fracturing operations. The method may include: generating a training data set including feature samples and prediction samples, wherein the feature samples include values derived from past pressure pulses in the well with or without other fracturing treatment data and the prediction samples include values derived from digital acoustic sensing (DAS) sensors located in the wellbore; training, with the training data set, a learning machine to predict the plug leak during the hydraulic fracturing operations based on pressure with or without other treatment data indicating one or more current pressure pulses.

First claim

Opening claim text (preview).

What is claimed is: 1 . A method for predicting a plug leak in a wellbore during hydraulic fracturing operations, the method comprising: generating a training data set including feature samples and prediction samples, wherein the feature samples include values derived from past pressure pulses in the well with or without other fracturing treatment data and the prediction samples include values derived from digital acoustic sensing (DAS) sensors located in the wellbore; training, with the training data set, a learning machine to predict the plug leak during the hydraulic fracturing operations based on pressure data indicating one or more current pressure pulses and with or without other treatment data. 2 . The method of claim 1 further comprising: predicting, by the learning machine after the training, the plug leak in the wellbore based on the pressure data indicating one or more current pressure pulses in the wellbore with or without other treatment data. 3 . The method of claim 2 , wherein the current and past pressure pulses are water hammer pressure pulses arising from the hydraulic fracturing operations. 4 . The method of claim 2 further comprising: determining, based on the pressure data, resistance in a stage of the wellbore, wherein the predicting the plug leak is based in part on the resistance. 5 . The method of claim 4 further comprising: determining, based on the pressure data, characterization decay, characterization amplitude, characterization period, and friction factor, wherein the predicting the plug leak is based in part on the characterization decay, characterization amplitude, characterization period, and friction factor. 6 . The method of claim 2 further comprising: determining a severity of the plug leak is beyond a severity threshold; and modifying, by a controller in response to the plug leak being beyond the severity threshold, the hydraulic fracturing operations based on an inventory resources for hydraulic fracturing. 7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein one or more of the prediction samples include values deterministically estimated based on the past pressure pulses in the wellbore. 8 . A computer system comprising: a processor; a learning machine including one or more non-transitory computer-readable mediums including instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to train learning machine to predict plug leaks in a wellbore during hydraulic fracturing operations, the instructions including instructions to generate a training data set including feature samples and prediction samples, wherein the feature samples include values derived from past pressure pulses in the well and the prediction samples include values derived from digital acoustic sensing (DAS) sensors located in the wellbore; instructions to train, with the training data set, a learning machine to predict the plug leaks during the hydraulic fracturing operations based on pressure data indicating one or more current pressure pulses. 9 . The computer system of claim 8 , the instructions further including: instructions to predict, by the learning machine after the instructions to train are complete, a plug leak in the wellbore based on current pressure data indicating one or more current pressure pulses in the wellbore. 10 . The computer system of claim 9 , wherein the one or more current and past pressure pulses are water hammer pressure pulses arising from the hydraulic fracturing operations. 11 . The computer system of claim 8 , the instructions further including: instructions to determine, based on the pressure data, resistance in a stage in the wellbore, wherein the prediction of the plug leak is based in part on the resistance. 12 . The computer system of claim 11 , the instructions further including: instructions to determine, based on the pressure data, characterization decay, characterization amplitude, characterization period, and Darcey factor, wherein the prediction of the plug leak is based in part on the characterization decay, characterization amplitude, characterization period, and Darcey factor. 13 . The computer system of claim 8 , the instructions further including: instructions to determine a severity of the plug leak is beyond a severity threshold; and instructions to modify, by a controller in response to the plug leak being beyond the severity threshold, the hydraulic fracturing operations based on an inventory resources for hydraulic fracturing. 14 . The computer system of claim 8 , wherein one or more of the prediction samples include values deterministically estimated based on the past pressure pulses in the wellbore. 15 . One or more non-transitory computer-readable mediums including instructions that, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to train learning machine to predict plug leaks in a wellbore during hydraulic fracturing operations, the instructions comprising: instructions to generate a training data set including feature samples and prediction samples, wherein the feature samples include values derived from past pressure pulses in the well and the prediction samples include values derived from digital acoustic sensing (DAS) sensors located in the wellbore; instructions to train, with the training data set, a learning machine to predict the plug leaks during the hydraulic fracturing operations based on pressure data indicating one or more current pressure pulses. 16 . The one or more non-transitory computer-readable mediums of claim 15 , the instructions further including: instructions to predict, by the learning machine after the instructions to train are complete, a plug leak in the wellbore based on pressure data indicating one or more current pressure pulses in the wellbore. 17 . The one or more non-transitory computer-readable mediums of claim 16 , wherein the one or more current and past pressure pulses are water hammer pressure pulses arising from the hydraulic fracturing operations. 18 . The one or more non-transitory computer-readable mediums of claim 17 , the instructions further including: instructions to determine, based on the pressure data, resistance in a stage of the wellbore, wherein the predicting the plug leak is based in part on the resistance. 19 . The one or more non-transitory computer-readable mediums of claim 18 , the instructions further comprising: instructions to determine, based on the pressure data, characterization decay, characterization amplitude, characterization period, and Darcey factor, wherein the predicting the plug leak is based in part on the characterization decay, characterization amplitude, characterization period, and Darcey factor. 20 . The one or more non-transitory computer-readable mediums of claim 18 , the instructions further comprising: instructions to determine a severity of the plug leak is beyond a severity threshold; and instructions to modify, by a controller in response to the plug leak being beyond the severity threshold, the hydraulic fracturing operations based on an inventory resources for hydraulic fracturing.

Assignees

Inventors

Classifications

  • Computer models or simulations, e.g. for reservoirs under production, drill bits · CPC title

  • Detecting leaks, e.g. from tubing, by pressure testing · CPC title

  • E21B43/26Primary

    by forming crevices or fractures · CPC title

  • Fuzzy logic, artificial intelligence, neural networks or the like · CPC title

  • E21B47/107Primary

    using acoustic means · CPC title

Patent family

Related publications grouped by family.

External sources

Frequently asked questions

Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.

What does patent US2025369325A1 cover?
Some implementations include a method for predicting a plug leak in a wellbore during hydraulic fracturing operations. The method may include: generating a training data set including feature samples and prediction samples, wherein the feature samples include values derived from past pressure pulses in the well with or without other fracturing treatment data and the prediction samples include v…
Who is the assignee on this patent?
Halliburton Energy Services Inc
What technology area does this patent fall under?
Primary CPC classification E21B43/26. Mapped technology areas include Fixed Constructions.
When was this patent published?
Publication date Thu Dec 04 2025 00:00:00 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) (A1). Legal status and post-grant events are not shown on this page.
What related patents are in patentsdb?
We list 3 related publications on this page (citations in our corpus or others sharing the same primary CPC).